It's even better with the sound on.
Don't help them dude
How can you find the core of a potential candidate by having broad rules? Having broad rules just expands the umbrella of available pool of candidates, its the opposite of narrowing down. What this actually does is decreases the qualities requirements of a potential straw hat just to fit in a character you want to join.
Well logically .. Before truying to dissmiss them.. Look at those 7 rules. Yes they are indeed "broad", but they are also a
must have. You can check those rules are enough for a first round of sorting. It's EXACTLY a way to narrow down the pool and it works.. only 5 characters are passing that first test.
There is no magic, just storytelling logic.
I mean for example, of your 5 candidates excluding Yamato and Carrot you have: Momo, Tama and Marco.
The chances of any of those 3 joining the crew are pretty much zero and dead now. Momo has been set to become the Shogun, Tama wants Wano to be fixed so she can live happily and Marco? Seriously? What are the chances of Marco joining the crew? His name doesn't even exist in the poll.
No. It's not 0, not at all, it's more than unlikely now, but it wasn't always the case.
Yet you're telling me that the likes of Marco, Momo and Tama have similiar chances to Yamato and Carrot of joining the crew?
Your seven rules isn't good at finding the core of a straw hat, as your candidates for the crew that your rules draws and brings in are nowhere even near capable of joining the crew.
Not similar ! There is a precipice between Marco, Momo Tama and Yamato + Carrot. You can check the end result to see that. But I staid consistant and even if those don't have the same chances, there is clews in the story that it's not a possibility to completely rule out.
The seven rules are not here to find the core of the strawhats, they are here to find the smaller common denominator to a potential candidate. (note that I'm making a distinction here between a potential candidate and a potential strawhat) meaning a character that could "potentially" leave with the strawhats.
Your seven rules don't do jack shit as we are just brought back to the same situation a year ago when all five of these candidates were still almost equally popular and were all very competitive to be the next straw hat.
You wasted all this time and effort in trying to tell me why your analysis and theory works, but you ended up telling me nothing as you just brought the debate back to a time and place like 2 years ago just so Carrot can be included on a equal playing field.
Some great 'analyst' you are. And you expect me to take you seriously? The only thing you've told me through this 'analysis' of yours is that you are a complete hack of an analyst.
Like I said in my introduction on the blog. I'm starting from
ZERO , meaning that I'm starting with a neutral and analysis stance on ALL the character of the serie.. so it's LOGICAL that in the first sorting.. we are ending up with popular characters. That's the point.
-----
And because you seems to have hard time accepting those rules, let me go back a little bit more details for each of them and you will see that you can't rule them out for a first sorting:
Being alive: This shouldn't be unacceptable. Being alive means that EVERY character must have an interaction with the world of living. So even brook who is technically dead "is alive" andnot ruled out by this rule. That's why character like Ace can't be on the crew.
Be relevant to the story: This is a way to rule out every small and insignificant character. Same, it's logical, you can't be a strawhat if you has not made minimum in the story. Therefore your average Mink or a one time character can't join the crew.
I think you are following me with those two.. Now:
Be unique, have a uniqueness or have a unique ability COMPARED to the crew. One storytelling rule in One Piece is that each strawhat is unique from the other. Even Brook compared to Zoro. So.. We need a rule to avoid doublon and character that would be too similar to the actual crew. With that, you can rule out actual important character like mihawk for exemple. Why is that ? Because mihawk is only the better version of Zoro (right now) %ohawk doesn't possess a real uniqueness to his character that wiill make him fundamentaly different from another strawhat like Zoro, only the design is different and it's just not enough.
Be free from factio dury or independant. I explained to you that rule in detail. A character must (in a way) be questionning is current faction or don't hve one. That's a non debatable rule. Without that, you can't become a real mugiwara, you will always be called back to your root. So that rule is not a point of debate.
Be a friend or a false adversary. Now this rule was made because of two things : The message of One Piece and Luffy. Luffy is a kind character but he does not forgive easily. If you cross the line, let's say for example that you torture his friend and destroy his friend's country.. you will be on his "I won't forgive you" list. This list is the list of the adversaries, the villains. With people like Ceasar, Crocodile or Enel. Those type of characters, also for the narratives reasons explained in my blog can't and will NEVER be strawhats.
But .. you can be a false adversary a join the strawhat. A false adversary is an adversary setup as an ally. Those are exactly what Robin and Franky were at there time.
Looking and acting toward adventure. This is also an important rule. You can't be a strawhat if you don't put your dream in front of you. To join the crew you must want to be part of an adventure.. if not .. there is NO PLACE for you .. I think this rule is pretty easy to understand.
Have a moral Pillar: That rule might be the most creative one, but it is also the most important. A strawhat can't advance without a purpose and this purpose usually comes from the dream of someone. That's why One Piece biggest theme is the "inherited will". Like I said in my log
You can be a strawhat if someone didn't push your back first toward adventure. This is a golden rule. This is what make One Piece.. One Piece. You will see that EACH strawhat are echoing that rule. For a good reason, because without it.. there would be no purpose.
-----
So .. You see.. you are just trying to deny that first sorting because you don't understand it.. but my analysis is throughout, if you can't understand this, there is indeed no time to waste and you can just move on.. you will have to find out that I'm right by yourself... later.
--------------------------------
And when exactly is that? You keep saying it’s Elbaf. Are you sure we’re getting Carrot focused story on Elbaf? Has it been hinted that Oda will focus on Carrot in Elbaf; in fact if he intended for Carrot to join from the points in manga?
No I'm not 100% sure, I'm not even 60 % sure that she will have her story on Elbaf. This is just a hypothesis. What I'm 100% sure is that Carrot will have a moment to shine later.. It could very well be at the VEeeeeeeeery end of the story. I don't know, I'm not omnipotent..
But if we look at the hints (Carrot being interested in Giant, Carrot being a bit too excited in front of danger / PErospero challenging the naivety of Carrot) the sign are murmuring "Elbaf" right now.. but yeah.. maybe those are completely wrong. That's why all I can make about Carrot's future.. are hypothesis.
Funny because the one who’s been using head canons to fulfill your agenda here is you. It’s not what I wish, but it what should have been. Oda could’ve just gone that possible way if he wanted Carrot to join, but he didn’t. It’s not rocket science.
I only use headcanon in hypothesis, not in my analysis.
It doesn't work that way lol.
For that to be a reality, you have needed Yamato to be present in the arc and be low like Carrot is now.
Another double standard denial
No, it's just logic. LOGIC. You can't have a red hearing if you don't have the subject and the decoy at the same place..
LMAO if you’re losing patience because of defending a fictional character who has no relevance whatsoever and start calling people names, then you are the one who is toxic. It’s even more hilarious that I keep asking evidences from manga, not your theories, hypothesis, or whatever it is and you easily triggered and accuse someone toxic because I keep asking evidence from the manga. The strongest argument you can give when you don’t have evidence is to by accusing them toxic.
No I'm losing patience because I'm have the impression that I'm repeating the same S** everyday without consequences. You see. I don't have patience with children.. and I have the impression that I need to educate a whole nursary..
serious question though: do you have any mental instability? You easily get triggered over little things which is definitely not toxic and assume it by yourself so you can start attacking Because previously you said you have english comprehension problem, but even people whose language isn’t english won’t be easily triggered and accusing people toxic; while at the same time having emotional breakdown and can’t stand call people by names. I assume you most probably have both english comprehension problem + mental instability.
Hm Yes, in the matter of fact I do have mental instability. (that one of the reason I can sometimes write walls of text and sometimes can't wrote two words) But that has nothing to do with the fact that I'm being triggered for neededing to repeat every F* day the same thing to only get laugh out of it lol I'm not easily triggered. trust me.
If I denouce the toxicity of some of you it's because it has an impact in real life. not only for me, but for others who feel that can't even have a talk without being bullied online. And toxicity start with a simple remarks hence why I'm a bit on the defensive.
Let's not be psychophobes hear shall we ?
Which means you don’t have any evidence being put in manga to support your argument, that’s why instead of giving evidence, you make head canon hypothesis. It really isn’t that hard to comprehend
That's the whole point about making an hypothesis.
I hope you understand the difference I'm making between an hyphothesis, a theory and an analysis ?
- An hypothesis rely on one (maybe more) element in the storyline, they are here to fil the gap for a mystery. That's why I say "if you have a better hypothesis, give it to me, we will debate on that"
- An analysis is well.. an analysis, for One Piece, it's relying on storytelling rules created out of and inside the story, those are made to explain narration/storylines and maybe expand on them a bit.
- A theory is a complete and strong addition of analysis and strong hypothesis that put together.. make a strong case for something.
The mystery is for you only because you don’t understand the story.
Yeah.. that not an argument that will work with me. I have proven to all of you that I have a better understanding of it. That's just factual and it comes from work. Now.. the problem is that you actually mostly don't understand the proof I'm giving you all lol
I have evidences, not hypothesis why Yamato was invented: because Oda intended for her to join. How did I know? Because Oda made herself said that she will join Luffy after she kicks Kaido out of Wano precisely like 1016.
See? It’s not that hard to give proper evidences. The one who keeps denying facts by giving more head canons here is you.
[/QUOTE]
That's not an evidence of the "why Yamato was invented" it's only a evidences that Yamato is thinking that she will join Luffy after wano. And even that is something more (I have already explained what it was, a subversion dialgue) You really need to go deeper in the story. This won't make the cut.
And because of that Oda made Yamato appeared late, because his editors told him so.
That.. we don't know that just an hypothesis and a debatable one as is relies on nothing.
it’s not called biased, but it’s called having a grip of reality. The ones who hates both Yamato & Carrot can see the reality that although they hate both, they can see which one Oda prefers and they don’t deny it.
Nah.. that's just magical thinking.
Funny that this post came to you. The only one who keeps using it to your narrative is you. You even intentionally crop Wanda out, and believe me only more denials to come from you.
Trust me I did nothing to this pic, it's for google lol. But I could have also gave you the one from jump fiesta were wanda is ALSO cropped out.. Would you have given me the same excuse ?
One panel is enough. There is NOWHERE in the story where Yamato has such a relationship to the strawhats.. it's a fact, an undeniable fact. unless you have a similar panel with Yamato. Carrot will ALWAYS be on top.
Factual.. undeniable.. cold.. reasonning.
the story obviously shows the opposite. Chapter 1016 Yamato stated that she will join Luffy after she kicks Kaido out of Wano. You’re the one who keeps staying in your delusional little world that you keep denying it. At least I have proof, unlike you.
no cuts nor crops
The more you are gonna hold up to the fact that yamato is thinking that she will join Luffy.. the more it's gonna hurt you in the end. Trust me, this will hurt.
Because there is no evidences here. none.
LMAO the one who get hurt here is you, obviously. Asking evidences from manga, you call them toxic just because you can’t prove it and starts using victim card like you always do. Funny that you ask me evidence and I can easily show you. That’s how arguments work. If you can’t give evidence, don’t get triggered and start being toxic yourself.
Your reply here made it obvious that you came here just to troll, like others have said. Honestly I feel a bit disappointed in myself that I believe at least I can get some senses into you. It turns out you are beyond saving. No need to get triggered if people treat you like a whole circus, because that’s what you’ve been doing.
I call poeple toxic when they are toxic, not when they try (like you here) to give me evidences. I like debate, this is not toxic for me. Where are you quoting/coming from ?
You are being a little bit agressive here, are you okay ? I thought we had a real bond .. I'm sad now
“I’m never triggered by toxicity” yet one of the words you said when you came here is to end the toxicity. You even called me toxic because I keep asking you evidence from manga, not theories. You obviously triggered because you clearly have no clues and proves, that instead of pointing the evidences out you act like a crybaby.
Wanting to end toxicity is a bit different than being just triggered by it. I do am trigggered by the lack of reasonning in here.. but not by toxicity, I'm used to it.
No need to act like a hero or something for someone else who literally not feeling triggered at all because the “toxicity” towards Carrot. Like I said again, this proves exactly that you are blinded by your own vanity. You’re so boastful that you said most/all Carrot theories come from you, and now you wanna act like a hero. You are the one here who’s trying so hard to act like a hero, protecting your fellow Carrot fans while at the same time instead of being a hero you’re being an absolute loser
I'm not a hero, I'm a pirate.
Even your fellow Carrot fans don’t acknowledge you as one of them, that’s why instead of supporting you, they ignore and leave you alone. Ask this to yourself: why Carrot fans don’t support you here? Even the most sane Carrot fan is a believer of both Yamato & Carrot instead of Carrot alone. Look, even dizzy is nowhere again to be seen. Your vanity is the reason why Carrot fans left you alone. Instead of supporting each other, you act like a hero yourself and discrediting them. Hope I strike at least a sense into you (FYI it’s SENSE not SENCE; the word SENCE doesn’t exist)
You really should learn to be like a normal human being like Shift, Pot Goblin, or Davidsuxx
Lol you are really speaking more and more like a bond villain xD
"Even your fellow fans have left you"
"See.. noone is there"
"You are all alone"
"You act like a hero but all you do really is hurt the one you protect"
Lmao.. this is so funny
I already told you. I'm not a hero hehehehe