Who will be the next Strawhat


  • Total voters
    895
Status
Not open for further replies.
A neologism is something that don't exist already my dude... Lmao xD
Then why you brought it up in the first place? If it doesn’t exist anymore means that term can’t be used for present situations. Are you saying that a word from a term that doesn’t exist anymore is more important than what the author has officially stated since like 15 years ago?

Did you hit your head really that hard?
 
Then why you brought it up in the first place? If it doesn’t exist anymore means that term can’t be used for present situations. Are you saying that a word from a term that doesn’t exist anymore is more important than what the author has officially stated since like 15 years ago?

Did you hit your head really that hard?
Because I created it to explain something that needed to be analysed and categorized. Simple.
 
Wano is indeed Carrot's last chance to stowaway. But the probability for this to happen is around 80-95% so I'm not afraid that Carrot will have a lot more time to shine later ;)
Her last chance to be developed and focused as a Strawhat was Wano.. The culmination of the mink storyline is Wano it's over for Carrot..

Every moments have an impact on moving the plot. Every last one of them.
Carrot trying to fight Brule, traveling with the Strawhats, beating up fodders in the Mirror world, saving Nami from fodder, attacking katakuri or Perospero, it has no impact on the plot whatsoever.. Carrot's character has been fan service from beginning to end..
 
Me not comprending...


Her last chance to be developed and focused as a Strawhat was Wano.. The culmination of the mink storyline is Wano it's over for Carrot..
Carrot is not related to the mink storyline, or more precisely, she has her own story line.

If Carrot stowaway like she is supposed to. Sky is the limit.


Carrot trying to fight Brule, traveling with the Strawhats, beating up fodders in the Mirror world, saving Nami from fodder, attacking katakuri or Perospero, it has no impact on the plot whatsoever.. Carrot's character has been fan service from beginning to end..
Wrong. It has, you just don't see it. I do.
 
Because I created it to explain something that needed to be analysed and categorized. Simple.
Then it’s settled you made it out, not something that existed before that it doesn’t exist anymore now. There is a huge difference between something that existed and doesn’t exist anymore now, to something you just created out of nowhere.

Look, it’s not so hard to admit like that. Simply say that the first time I asked you instead of doing mental gymnastics to protect your ego

And your creation does not matter to the whole storytelling.

Keep crying
:holdthisl::ihaha:
Post automatically merged:

Do you not Carrot all either?
LMAO he doesn’t understand that “Carrot” here is “care-at”. I immediately understand the first time you said it. You bodied him real hard I’m laughing
 
Carrot is not related to the mink storyline, or more precisely, she has her own story line.

If Carrot stowaway like she is supposed to. Sky is the limit.
She's a mink, she's related to the mink storyline by default.. Nekomamushi took over her plotline and ended it..

Wrong. It has, you just don't see it. I do.
Carrot was never essential to the story, prove me the contrary..
 
"I don't care at all" = "I don't Carrot all"
Ah! Good one.

Which one causes the only things I see that is she is fighting for wano just as she says she would at 8 years old also is luffy staying in wano too cause his subtext is just like Yamato fighting for the country give back the citizen's their freedom? 🤔 or I am over analyzing it?
She is also saying that she can't be Oden if she abandons wano :)

Do you not Carrot all either?
:sanmoji:


Then it’s settled you made it out, not something that existed before that it doesn’t exist anymore now.
Yes.. that what a neologism is lol

Most of my concept are neologism.. why ? Because they are describing narrative pattern that haven't been theorized yet in the world of storytelling (at least not in my knowledge) And because One Piece use a lot of those pattern, I needed to create neologism to name those narrative pattern and concepts..

I don't really see what is so hard to understand here:

- Subversion Dialogue
- "Cap Giver" for Robin
- Development inertia
- The third driving force
- The shining Nakama action
- Plantings (pre existed but I went farther in the conceptualization of this parameter)

All of those are neologism. But they are also parameters describing a narrative reality, either be a narrative concept, an occurance, a notion, a tool etc.

Those are not "mental gymnastic" those are the basis for storytelling theorizing and analysis.

But I can understand that someof those are quite out of reach. That's why I have a blog where all those concepts are explained carefully.
Post automatically merged:

LMAO he doesn’t understand that “Carrot” here is “care-at”. I immediately understand the first time you said it. You bodied him real hard I’m laughing
lol


She's a mink, she's related to the mink storyline by default.. Nekomamushi took over her plotline and ended it..
Yes, on the surface, in the subtext, CArrot has her own storyarc. Something that the minks don't have.


Carrot was never essential to the story, prove me the contrary..
Already done, sick of repeating myself.
 
Yes.. that what a neologism is lol

Most of my concept are neologism.. why ? Because they are describing narrative pattern that haven't been theorized yet in the world of storytelling (at least not in my knowledge) And because One Piece use a lot of those pattern, I needed to create neologism to name those narrative pattern and concepts..

I don't really see what is so hard to understand here:

- Subversion Dialogue
- "Cap Giver" for Robin
- Development inertia
- The third driving force
- The shining Nakama action
- Plantings (pre existed but I went farther in the conceptualization of this parameter)

All of those are neologism. But they are also parameters describing a narrative reality, either be a narrative concept, an occurance, a notion, a tool etc.

Those are not "mental gymnastic" those are the basis for storytelling theorizing and analysis.

But I can understand that someof those are quite out of reach. That's why I have a blog where all those concepts are explained carefully.
Your concept doesn’t matter. Oda has already stated that he may take references, but One Piece’s story isn’t that deep. No need to use neologism concept or whatever bullshits to analyze where the fact that the author himself stated that his story isn’t that deep.

Your bullshit about Cap Giver which you created also irrelevant since it has nothing to do with the story. Robin’s role is the archaeologist, and no bullshit creation of yours can change that fact.

I don’t really see what is so hard to understand here.
 
Your concept doesn’t matter. Oda has already stated that he may take references, but One Piece’s story isn’t that deep. No need to use neologism concept to analyze or whatever bullshits where the fact that the author himself stated that his story isn’t that deep.

Your bullshit about Cap Giver which you created also irrelevant since it has nothing to do with the story. Robin’s role is the archaeologist, and no bullshit creation of yours can change that fact.

I don’t really see what is so hard to understand here.
He's basically saying he doesn't care about Actual Canon and makes up shit to fit his views.
What a sad pathetic child.
 
Your concept doesn’t matter. Oda has already stated that he may take references, but One Piece’s story isn’t that deep
The excuse given by those who don't care about storytelling "One Piece is not that deep"

Let me give you a spoiler: There is no such thing as "deep stories"

Either a story is crafted well enough to deliver what it is Crafted to deliver, or it doesn't and become therefore a bad story.

The difference between a good and a bad story are:

1. The level of craftmanship put in the work behind the storytelling process
2. The amount of the craft that hits the audience as it was intended to

One Piece is not a good story because it's "deep". One Piece is a good story because there is a LOT of work put into the storytelling for one, and secondly, most of the bit are hitting the audiance on a primal emotionnal level.

So.. When I analyse One Piece, i'm not digging "deep". I'm sorting out the puzzle of the craft behind the construction of the story.

As long as you will think that i'm analysing a "deep" story, you will never understand what i'm actually doing.

He's basically saying he doesn't care about Actual Canon and makes up shit to fit his views.
What a sad pathetic child.
On the contrary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top