Why would they ? Most youtubers are not analyst
There is a rule with Oda. If a fight don't matter, there is no need to show it. That was the case here with Carrot. Her fight wasn't the focal point of her action. On the contrary, her defeat was, we can see that because of the treatment of that defeat. It has impact, it has value. In that matter, the speech of Perospero is very important because he is a bad guy and Carrot a good one. This must not be ignored. This defeat will come into play in the arc of Carrot, must it be with a simple flashback or something more.
Nah, this was in fact a pretty basic and objective deconstruction
If you only took her lack of panel in Wano has a counter indication that she wasn't going to be one, then you ignored all that happened in whole cake. That's not called analysis, that's called blindness.
Nami doesn't nullifies anything, she is here as a focus helper, her body acts as a frame to help the reader focus on the center of the panel. Much like parenthesis. "( )"
Nah
Still no. I have my reasons. You have my profil picture which is a simple outlining. This should be enough.
Yes, her head and torso.
It's called an analysis. Yamato is not impressed here by Luffy, she is impressed by the fact that the fight is similar to the fight between Roger and Whitebeard.
Strawhats don't follow Luffy because of what he said or what he is. They follow Luffy because of what he does. Luffy made them believed in him. They made they believe in miracle. That's why Yamato as yes to be impressed with Luffy that way, and that's why I'm waiting for Carrot to have this exact reaction in front of Joy Boy in the next three chapters.
I was nice to you until now but again, if you keep on with the same toxicity as the other, this respect will fade away real quick.
She is not at the center of the line of sight, she A subject of the lines of sight. In fact all the left ones, while all the right ones are pointing toward Jinbe's face.
No false information here, just pure composition deconstruction. Just like I did when I explained to you what the role of an antagonist was. But like you that personn did not believed me.. why ? Because they are either biased or not have enough knowledge about said subject. In an image, you should learn that there is not only one subject all the time. In fact sometimes, there are a few. That's why the composition, the line of sight and the sight directive lines are important: To MOVE the eyes where the Author wants you to see. In this panel it's: Jinbe's face > Luffy > Carrot > The strawhats. It can also be Jinbe's face > Luffy > The strawhats > Carrot, depending on your eyes and priorities.
The fact is, Carrot is a subject in this image. Because of the composition wether you like it or not.
Omg..
No he is not.
Never said the opposite, but it's also a strawhat panel before everything. Because of CONTEXT.
She is. Not the main one, but A point of focus. As a Carrot fan, I'm very much dissapointed in your analysis here.. You look like more like a Yamato propagandist that anything..
She is in the CENTER of this panel my boy. Try to take a hint.
Yup, if you don't like that, try looking at the panel again
Lmao What is that take ?