Fistly bounty doesn’t work like that. Bounty isn’t necessarily an strength indicator
2nd We have seen strong characters handle quite easily weaker opponents as if it was nothing.
That's why the system is not good in Micro, but those are
exceptions.
So In Micro no, but in macro it works! Completely in fact. There is a direct link between the bounty and the power level. It's not 100% accurate but it's a good enough indicator to make an affirmation about strenght level. DOn't even start with that debate. You'll lose.
Reasons: he is strong but also due to being the oldest son, his strategic mind he holds a high level of command over the other Big mom pirates. That is why his bounty is so high. He is definitely weaker than Sabo who could go toe to toe with an admiral but has only a bounty of 602 million.
Concerning Perospero, you need to check ALSO the comparison in the story. Inu and Neko have similar strenght and Inu and Neko BOTH struggled again Jack and Perospero in the SAME WAY.
So Perospero and jack are in fact pretty much equal in strenght, hence why it was very unlikely for carrot to win this round.
But you can EASILY cut by two the strenght of Perospero and you get a range between a man of a 300 and 500 M B bounty. Again, narrative logic.
If I have to power scale carrot I would but her at the level around Kalifa from CP9 and in sulong form at Kaku level.
Yeah.. You are lost mate.
bounty mostly represents how much threat you pose to the world government instead of your strength
carrot may or may not be strong but she definitely doesn't pose much of a threat to the world government
Bounty does not represent strenght but it is a good clue. That's why she would be around the realm of a 300-400 M bounty man.
Hmmm, I don't think so y'all the one who is trying to make up shit but didn't do it when jinbei and brook were introduced but now y'all want to do that shit with Yamato
I did the same thing with Jinbe and Brook at the time. The difference is, There was a lot less opposition to those theories at the time so I didn't need to go into such a lenght to prove my point.
Like I said, if you don't care to read you opponent's argument, don't be surprised when you will find out that your are wrong and this was under your nose the whole time ;)
Wrong... You're kinda strawmanning, even "surviving" means more power
No strawhmaning here. Surviving means having enough power to survive in the new world, nothing more, nothing less. That was the prerequite of the 2Y training.
Getting "more" power is optionnal.
No, a fact. You can't project yourself into the future of the story as you don't understand one of the foundamental rule of storytelling being : "character are humans". So you will only end up being surprise again and again.
Pure narrative logic.
Anyway, there's no proof that Carrot can defeat even the weaker of the 2...
There is no proof that she can't either. And because we can't prove the inexistance of something. You will have to wait before making an affirmation on that subject. Basic logic.
LOL you failed to understand what I said... Carrot never even once assaulted a Yonko...
I don't see how that's a recruitment parameter mate. But maybe you have intel I don't ;)
Oops no you don't. That's irrelevant.