B
Rectification: A lot of my hypothesis were wrong. But hypothesis are just hypothesis.
Here - with CarrotForNakama - we are talking about a theory
There is a reason why I can counter so easily the argumentation of the yamato base. The Yamato case/theory is only composed of hypothesis and subjective reasonning, the opposite of my CarrotforNakama theory which is a complete theory.
A theory is not an hypothesis, it's an entire load of works, facts, reasonning.. all combined together. It's aiming to be the most efficient way to explain an element. (here, the unique and odd treatment of Carrot)
When an hypothesis is a grain of sand, a theory is the Great Pyramid of Giza.
It's solid.
So needless to say that I'm very .. very .. VERY confident about my theory.
Here - with CarrotForNakama - we are talking about a theory
There is a reason why I can counter so easily the argumentation of the yamato base. The Yamato case/theory is only composed of hypothesis and subjective reasonning, the opposite of my CarrotforNakama theory which is a complete theory.
A theory is not an hypothesis, it's an entire load of works, facts, reasonning.. all combined together. It's aiming to be the most efficient way to explain an element. (here, the unique and odd treatment of Carrot)
When an hypothesis is a grain of sand, a theory is the Great Pyramid of Giza.
It's solid.
So needless to say that I'm very .. very .. VERY confident about my theory.
Carrot won't join.