General & Others Next Strawhat Crew Members and the Grand Fleet
- Thread starter Guan Yu
- Start date
- Tags #carrot4prison #furries4carrot #larrot #yamato4nakama #yamatofansunite #yamatoisnakama carrot blows cry about carrot furries for nakama furries scurries i need my support carrot body pillow oni princess and the pirate king this thread stupid we're here for jew vs dizzy who wants rabbit stew yamato > carrot yamato best girl yamato finds the one piece yamato hype yamato is the last crew mate
- Status
In that same post you say that you don't have that kinda tame, but let's assume you're referring to the second part of that post.
You're giving an example of psychophobia, a "clear example".
I'm asking you for a definition. Since you're not new to defining terms (and even creating them) it shouldn't be a problem to you.
:)
You're giving an example of psychophobia, a "clear example".
I'm asking you for a definition. Since you're not new to defining terms (and even creating them) it shouldn't be a problem to you.
:)
Dumbs with the same IQ flops together...
No it doesn't.
Combattant is not a role on a ship. I hear what you are saying and I understand that Yamato is indeed characterized as a combattant, but on the ship, it doesn't matter. Their is a reason the role of Zoro was never announced as a official "combattant", his role is FIRST MATE. That's his role on the ship, in the undertext of the story, not combattant. Again, a role must have something to do with the PLACE on the Sunny. "Combattant" alone means nothing, it has no self value.
No their is NOTHING in Yamato's characterization showing that she is a Log keeper. Inin contrary to what you are saying nothing in the milking surrounding Yamato is leading us to believe that. Nothing.
Yes, Yamato could be an apprentice I could actually accept that as Yamato is indeed characterized through inexperience. That's the only potential possibility for Yamato on the crew. But given her confidence, her age and her strenght, this possibility is more than unlikely.
Of course their is a difference mate, hundreds of panel of difference. Her treatments are in NO WAY similar. Camie is treated as a background helping character who do not take part into the action, when Carrot is directly taking part into the action, you are out of the field here mate, those case are completely different. So don't try to compare Carrot to such character.
Not at all, Carrot has NEVER been a main arc character. Main arc character are the character that are the most focused on during the arc, that are thematically the most relevant, they are few on each arc. On whole cake it was for example Sanji / Big Mom / Pudding and Luffy
NOT Carrot or Pedro or even Chopper.
If there is a fetish with Furry, it's ith you guys who keep talking about it, not with me.
Oh! An incel argumentation
Yeah, and you are about to feel that just fine
She will tho
Because Morj is one of the few analyst that has an actual understanding of storytelling. I do not agree vith everything with him (for instance, that the raid would fail) but he knows his stuff and his theory are based on real storytelling instinct (I don't think he has a full knowledge yet)
Combattant is not a role on a ship. I hear what you are saying and I understand that Yamato is indeed characterized as a combattant, but on the ship, it doesn't matter. Their is a reason the role of Zoro was never announced as a official "combattant", his role is FIRST MATE. That's his role on the ship, in the undertext of the story, not combattant. Again, a role must have something to do with the PLACE on the Sunny. "Combattant" alone means nothing, it has no self value.
No their is NOTHING in Yamato's characterization showing that she is a Log keeper. Inin contrary to what you are saying nothing in the milking surrounding Yamato is leading us to believe that. Nothing.
Yes, Yamato could be an apprentice I could actually accept that as Yamato is indeed characterized through inexperience. That's the only potential possibility for Yamato on the crew. But given her confidence, her age and her strenght, this possibility is more than unlikely.
Of course their is a difference mate, hundreds of panel of difference. Her treatments are in NO WAY similar. Camie is treated as a background helping character who do not take part into the action, when Carrot is directly taking part into the action, you are out of the field here mate, those case are completely different. So don't try to compare Carrot to such character.
Not at all, Carrot has NEVER been a main arc character. Main arc character are the character that are the most focused on during the arc, that are thematically the most relevant, they are few on each arc. On whole cake it was for example Sanji / Big Mom / Pudding and Luffy
NOT Carrot or Pedro or even Chopper.
If there is a fetish with Furry, it's ith you guys who keep talking about it, not with me.
Oh! An incel argumentation
Yeah, and you are about to feel that just fine
She will tho
Because Morj is one of the few analyst that has an actual understanding of storytelling. I do not agree vith everything with him (for instance, that the raid would fail) but he knows his stuff and his theory are based on real storytelling instinct (I don't think he has a full knowledge yet)
They're my go-to words when a theory is complete nonsense or baseless, which has happened time and time again with Lorj.
I know theories aren't analysis, my point was that he can't make logical theories and then acts like they're a fact and NOT theories, hence he was getting clowned on for his behaviour, especially when he was proven wrong. He can analyse content just fine, but he sucks at theories, though obviously if you actually read my point and didn't cherrypick what to reply to you would know that.
The fact you even lack the self awareness to realize how ridiculous you sound by comparing people here to flat earthers when you're the one coming up with shaky theories, and after having admitted yourself you invented a concept to fit said theories better is honestly astouding.
My point will always stay the same, we see Yamato clearly say she wants to join the SHs, and multiple instances of the story, at the very least, hint towards her actually joining the crew (such as, but not limited to, the much disliked Oden parallel, her connection to Ace, her desire for freedom, her sheer strength and ability to hold her own and her gratefulness to Luffy for freeing her).
My brother in christ, I can't understand what you expect Oda when all this shit was included in the story.
I know theories aren't analysis, my point was that he can't make logical theories and then acts like they're a fact and NOT theories, hence he was getting clowned on for his behaviour, especially when he was proven wrong. He can analyse content just fine, but he sucks at theories, though obviously if you actually read my point and didn't cherrypick what to reply to you would know that.
The fact you even lack the self awareness to realize how ridiculous you sound by comparing people here to flat earthers when you're the one coming up with shaky theories, and after having admitted yourself you invented a concept to fit said theories better is honestly astouding.
My point will always stay the same, we see Yamato clearly say she wants to join the SHs, and multiple instances of the story, at the very least, hint towards her actually joining the crew (such as, but not limited to, the much disliked Oden parallel, her connection to Ace, her desire for freedom, her sheer strength and ability to hold her own and her gratefulness to Luffy for freeing her).
My brother in christ, I can't understand what you expect Oda when all this shit was included in the story.
Last edited:
They're my go-to words when a theory is complete nonsense or baseless, which has happened time and time again with Lorj.
I know theories aren't analysis, my point was that he can't make logical theories and then acts like they're a fact and NOT theories, hence he was getting clowned on for his behaviour, especially when he was proven wrong. He can analyse content just fine, but he sucks at theories, though obviously if you actually read my point and didn't cherrypick what to reply to you would know that.
The fact you even lack the self awareness by comparing people to flat earthers here when you're the one coming up with nonsense, and after having admitted yourself you invented a concept to fit your theories better is honestly astouding.
My point will always stay the same, we see Yamato clearly say she wants to join the SHs, and multiple instances of the story, at the very least, hint towards her actually joining the crew (such as, but not limited to, the much disliked Oden parallel, her connection to Ace, her desire for freedom, her sheer strength and ability to hold her own and her gratefulness to Luffy for freeing her).
My brother in christ, I can't understand what you expect Oda when all this shit was included in the story.
I know theories aren't analysis, my point was that he can't make logical theories and then acts like they're a fact and NOT theories, hence he was getting clowned on for his behaviour, especially when he was proven wrong. He can analyse content just fine, but he sucks at theories, though obviously if you actually read my point and didn't cherrypick what to reply to you would know that.
The fact you even lack the self awareness by comparing people to flat earthers here when you're the one coming up with nonsense, and after having admitted yourself you invented a concept to fit your theories better is honestly astouding.
My point will always stay the same, we see Yamato clearly say she wants to join the SHs, and multiple instances of the story, at the very least, hint towards her actually joining the crew (such as, but not limited to, the much disliked Oden parallel, her connection to Ace, her desire for freedom, her sheer strength and ability to hold her own and her gratefulness to Luffy for freeing her).
My brother in christ, I can't understand what you expect Oda when all this shit was included in the story.
He's a master analyst. Don't question him. 
I’ve never met someone as delusional as @CarrotForNakama. But I’m also happy that he clearly stated “carrot will join” and “Yamato won’t”
So he can not backtrack later on it
Psychophobia in (very) short is using the mental of a person or the vision we have of the mental state of a person against them.
Well like I said, I don't agree with a lot of his hypothesis
It's having a good base knowledge that is enough to analyse correctly the story. The theory can be wrong but the base is still strong.
I have everything in the story with me mate. And it's more than just panelling, it's about an entire treatment, difference in the storytelling, difference in the interactions, difference in the narration. It's huge differences !
Hm.. after consideration you COULD indeed consider Pedro a minor Main arc character just like Pudding. He is indeed playing a Key role in the arc.
Yamato is a main arc character. Carrot is a side character who will rise to become a strawhat.
Only because he is basing his theory on actual storytelling basis. Actual data, on the contrary to most theorist out there, who are much less professionnal
Do you clown a scientist when his theory is proven wrong ? No. You celebrate him.
Trust me, you guys sound ust like them, on the contrary to morj, I bring actual basic knowledge with REAL storytelling data..
Your reaction :"YoU ArE iNvEnTiNg CoNcEpT tHeReFoRe YoU ArE WrOnG" that's a reaction you only get in front of ignorance. A logical person would understand that being the invention of the term their is the description of a REAL storytelling pattern. Morj would understand that, that's why he is quite different from the rest of you.
Yeah
And treated like usual subversion are, with a corruption in the premisse. Sooo.. yeah.. but all those interaction are MOST LIKELY subversion..
I expect him to do what he does best, surprise everyone.
Glad you remember that, there might be somethings that I can teach you guys after all that mayham.
Well like I said, I don't agree with a lot of his hypothesis
It's having a good base knowledge that is enough to analyse correctly the story. The theory can be wrong but the base is still strong.
I have everything in the story with me mate. And it's more than just panelling, it's about an entire treatment, difference in the storytelling, difference in the interactions, difference in the narration. It's huge differences !
what a main arc character is even though one of the biggest moments of the arc, Pedro's sacrifice, is directly tied to Carrot and the only real thing she has going for as a character that even got carried over to this arc
Yamato is a main arc character. Carrot is a side character who will rise to become a strawhat.
Only because he is basing his theory on actual storytelling basis. Actual data, on the contrary to most theorist out there, who are much less professionnal
Do you clown a scientist when his theory is proven wrong ? No. You celebrate him.
Trust me, you guys sound ust like them, on the contrary to morj, I bring actual basic knowledge with REAL storytelling data..
Your reaction :"YoU ArE iNvEnTiNg CoNcEpT tHeReFoRe YoU ArE WrOnG" that's a reaction you only get in front of ignorance. A logical person would understand that being the invention of the term their is the description of a REAL storytelling pattern. Morj would understand that, that's why he is quite different from the rest of you.
Yeah
And treated like usual subversion are, with a corruption in the premisse. Sooo.. yeah.. but all those interaction are MOST LIKELY subversion..
I expect him to do what he does best, surprise everyone.
Post automatically merged:
Glad you remember that, there might be somethings that I can teach you guys after all that mayham.
Last edited:
- Status