Questions & Mysteries Why was Roger not WSS?
- Thread starter kurwa
- Start date
Well if you don't have evidence that means your point is meaningless. I don't need to have evidence because I am not the one claiming anything.
uh what? Roger is being constantly brought, the fuck are you talking about?
He was brought up when talking about Yonko bounties.
What are you talking about? Roger was being called a "Great Pirate" and "Pirate King", schizo.
uh what? Roger is being constantly brought, the fuck are you talking about?
- Roger was brought up when mentioning Yonko bounties
- Roger was brought up whenever Luffy talks about being Pirate King
- Roger was brought up whenever Kaido opened his mouth
He was brought up when talking about Yonko bounties.
What are you talking about? Roger was being called a "Great Pirate" and "Pirate King", schizo.
You're literally trying to force a correlation between Roger and the WSS title for some Shanks>Mihawl argument lol
Roger was Greatest Captain, Strongest Swordsman and Most Wanted Man, which turned him into Pirate King
However Mihawk is Stronger Swordsman, Shanks have Greater Crew and Dragon is Worse Criminal, Oda made sure to tease these Three during East Blue Saga and reserved them till now
At the end, Luffy will gather Crew greater than Shanks, Zoro will defeat Mihawk and Nami gonna unleash a World Changing Storm with Dragon Help
They are Triggers of One Piece as Oda called them and together by surpassing those Three Strongest Top Tiers, they will be able to fulfill One Piece Endgoal
Fame, Wealth, Power
Enough said
However Mihawk is Stronger Swordsman, Shanks have Greater Crew and Dragon is Worse Criminal, Oda made sure to tease these Three during East Blue Saga and reserved them till now
At the end, Luffy will gather Crew greater than Shanks, Zoro will defeat Mihawk and Nami gonna unleash a World Changing Storm with Dragon Help
They are Triggers of One Piece as Oda called them and together by surpassing those Three Strongest Top Tiers, they will be able to fulfill One Piece Endgoal
Fame, Wealth, Power
Enough said
lmao, got disproven wrong so now you are using "just answer me this" shit in order to deflect from your shit points being refuted?
I don't need to know. There's nothing to suggest that it didn't exist.
Whitebeard was being called WSM during Roger's era just fine.
How about YOU prove that it didn't exist?
Because he wasn't, schizo. That's the point. Which means using a sword in a fight got nothing to do with WSS title.
And Shanks is obviously is modeled to fight like Roger, which means Shanks does not lose Mihawk just because he has a sword.
Once again, I'm asking why was Roger not brought up when gassing up Mihawk?
Is MIhawk stronger than Roger?
I don't need to know. There's nothing to suggest that it didn't exist.
Whitebeard was being called WSM during Roger's era just fine.
How about YOU prove that it didn't exist?
Because he wasn't, schizo. That's the point. Which means using a sword in a fight got nothing to do with WSS title.
And Shanks is obviously is modeled to fight like Roger, which means Shanks does not lose Mihawk just because he has a sword.
Once again, I'm asking why was Roger not brought up when gassing up Mihawk?
Is MIhawk stronger than Roger?
lmao, got disproven wrong so now you are using "just answer me this" shit in order to deflect from your shit points being refuted?
I don't need to know. There's nothing to suggest that it didn't exist.
Whitebeard was being called WSM during Roger's era just fine.
How about YOU prove that it didn't exist?
Because he wasn't, schizo. That's the point. Which means using a sword in a fight got nothing to do with WSS title.
And Shanks is obviously is modeled to fight like Roger, which means Shanks does not lose Mihawk just because he has a sword.
Once again, I'm asking why was Roger not brought up when gassing up Mihawk?
Is MIhawk stronger than Roger?
I don't need to know. There's nothing to suggest that it didn't exist.
Whitebeard was being called WSM during Roger's era just fine.
How about YOU prove that it didn't exist?
Because he wasn't, schizo. That's the point. Which means using a sword in a fight got nothing to do with WSS title.
And Shanks is obviously is modeled to fight like Roger, which means Shanks does not lose Mihawk just because he has a sword.
Once again, I'm asking why was Roger not brought up when gassing up Mihawk?
Is MIhawk stronger than Roger?
And Shanks isn't Roger. He exists in an era where he is a swordsman under the WSS.
lmao, got disproven wrong so now you are using "just answer me this" shit in order to deflect from your shit points being refuted?
I don't need to know. There's nothing to suggest that it didn't exist.
Whitebeard was being called WSM during Roger's era just fine.
How about YOU prove that it didn't exist?
Because he wasn't, schizo. That's the point. Which means using a sword in a fight got nothing to do with WSS title.
And Shanks is obviously is modeled to fight like Roger, which means Shanks does not lose Mihawk just because he has a sword.
Once again, I'm asking why was Roger not brought up when gassing up Mihawk?
Is MIhawk stronger than Roger?
I don't need to know. There's nothing to suggest that it didn't exist.
Whitebeard was being called WSM during Roger's era just fine.
How about YOU prove that it didn't exist?
Because he wasn't, schizo. That's the point. Which means using a sword in a fight got nothing to do with WSS title.
And Shanks is obviously is modeled to fight like Roger, which means Shanks does not lose Mihawk just because he has a sword.
Once again, I'm asking why was Roger not brought up when gassing up Mihawk?
Is MIhawk stronger than Roger?
When they talked on shanks bounty he got 0 hype they spoke on his crew and he was the only one to have his commanders named
On mihawk they bought up him being > shanks as a swordsman
That only holds weight if shanks is a swordsman in the first place
I wouldn't hype zoro by saying he's a stronger swordsman than Marco
You are claiming that Roger wasnt WSS.
To claim that you need evidence that someone else was WSS.
Do you have such evidence or not, sister?
To claim that you need evidence that someone else was WSS.
Do you have such evidence or not, sister?
I will require a panel of your evidence
Don't know. How about you name him?
Was Roger not a swordsman in previous era? Was Ryuma not being called a swordsman 800yrs ago?
How are they suddenly not fall under WSS?
Your argument in a nutshell: absence of evidence is evidence of absence
No one was called WSS. Neither Roger nor Rayleigh, Shiki, Xebec & co. The conclusion is, that this title was irrelevant for the story told by Oda. Mihawk was introduced once with the WSS title as to set him up against Zoro, whose dream it is to obtain this title. Roger was introduced with the title Luffy cares about. Great Pirate and Pirate King.
Why does Roger matter at all. Oda keeps up a rivalry between Mihawk and Shanks.
No one was called WSS. Neither Roger nor Rayleigh, Shiki, Xebec & co. The conclusion is, that this title was irrelevant for the story told by Oda. Mihawk was introduced once with the WSS title as to set him up against Zoro, whose dream it is to obtain this title. Roger was introduced with the title Luffy cares about. Great Pirate and Pirate King.
Why does Roger matter at all. Oda keeps up a rivalry between Mihawk and Shanks.
