Do you believe in evolution?

believe in evolution?

  • yes i do

  • no, i dont


Results are only viewable after voting.

Mashiro Blue

𝓦𝓲𝓼𝓱 𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓷 π“ͺ 𝓼𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓼𝓽π“ͺ𝓻 ✰
β€Ž
Evolution is a fact. Religious texts are outdated.
 
Whoa you're insulting again

Do you think it makes your point more valid when you use insults?
so you u atleast accept he implied that or are deriving a tangent to dodge your lack of capability

If you are too sensitive to even take metaphors as insults that even you were using for humour on me and anything like labeling someone BIGOT makes it an insult....
That's either your naivete or you're just childish.. The irony of that tho.

For someone who's this dismissive and arrogant you sure act self-righteous and ethical. I advise against hypocrisy
 

AL sama

Red Haired
β€Ž
not a constructive criticism i must say lol . Religious agendas? lol granted my beliefs are rooted in my religion do you have anything other than that to criticise .. like my points for example.. there is a stunning ad hominem i see here
like " you have religious reasons hence your points are invalid "
thats quite the lack of wisdom


evolution as an empirical process is a fact

but human-chimp common ancestry isn't

and even universal common ancestry isn't

any such cliam made is made on an assumption to construct explanation

just because something has a well elaborate explanation doesn't mean its a concrete fact at best its an acceptable explanation which can be disregarded

a scientific theory is not a fact black and white

i'm just saying folks have the right to deny some idea that isn't even concrete let alone complete and has fundamental assumptions in it like "assuming common ancestry", "homology ", "natural selection is the only proper mechanism deriving evolution " ,"there are only naturalistic explanations ".

to say that its a fact shows ignorance and coupled that with arrogance you get Darwinists.



i don't wanna argue with you on this it doesn't seem like it'd be going anywhere

but here's the gist of what is scientifically valid coming from an academic professional in the realm himself as he quotes sources. its a 10 minute video
hope you have the time, patience and the judgment to proceed with this
come talk to me when you can use logic without religious agendas lol
ok
 

Mashiro Blue

𝓦𝓲𝓼𝓱 𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓷 π“ͺ 𝓼𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓼𝓽π“ͺ𝓻 ✰
β€Ž
The thing with religious texts is that it was written by someone from someone who supposedly said those things.

Iirc for the New Testament it was written 300 years after the death of the "child of God", and thus subject to manipulation by the Men of that Era.

This poses several dilemmas:

1- We have no idea if the author had verifiable sources.

2- We don't know if it wasn't manipulated to further some kind of agenda in that Era.

3- The so called prophets, even though they entered a trance state to receive those messages from Spiritual Beings, we have no idea if those beings were aligned with the Higher Purpose or were low vibrational beings.

4- it is unclear if they received those messages without interference from nearby sources or other spiritual interference.

5- Messages from the Spiritual Realm are adjusted to the mentality of that Era in a way that the human brain can process and remember. Everything is done and given progressivly so that Humanity can slowly adjust and slowly evolve (in terms of reaching Higher Consciouness and Unity with All that Is).

As such old religious served their purpose, but nowadays (or for a long time now) it should be taken with a "grain of salt", for lack of a better wording.
 
The thing with religious texts is that it was written by someone from someone who supposedly said those things.

Iirc for the New Testament it was written 300 years after the death of the "child of God", and thus subject to manipulation by the Men of that Era.

This poses several dilemmas:

1- We have no idea if the author had verifiable sources.

2- We don't know if it wasn't manipulated to further some kind of agenda in that Era.

3- The so called prophets, even though they entered a trance state to receive those messages from Spiritual Beings, we have no idea if those beings were aligned with the Higher Purpose or were low vibrational beings.

4- it is unclear if they received those messages without interference from nearby sources or other spiritual interference.

5- Messages from the Spiritual Realm are adjusted to the mentality of that Era in a way that the human brain can process and remember. Everything is done and given progressivly so that Humanity can slowly adjust and slowly evolve (in terms of reaching Higher Consciouness and Unity with All that Is).

As such old religious served their purpose, but nowadays (or for a long time now) it should be taken with a "grain of salt", for lack of a better wording.
Religion is a non factor.. it is just an incentive to rejection not the premise of rejection

That's the fallacy everyone here is falling for even @AL sama but only if he knew
 

Mashiro Blue

𝓦𝓲𝓼𝓱 𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓷 π“ͺ 𝓼𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓼𝓽π“ͺ𝓻 ✰
β€Ž
Religion is a non factor.. it is just an incentive to rejection not the premise of rejection

That's the fallacy everyone here is falling for even @AL sama but only if he knew
Oh I see.

Then whatever. If it's not Spirituality, I'm not really interested.
 
Messages from the Spiritual Realm are adjusted to the mentality of that Era in a way that the human brain can process and remember. Everything is done and given progressivly so that Humanity can slowly adjust and slowly evolve (in terms of reaching Higher Consciouness and Unity with All that Is).
‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
 

Mashiro Blue

𝓦𝓲𝓼𝓱 𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓷 π“ͺ 𝓼𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓼𝓽π“ͺ𝓻 ✰
β€Ž
Top