not a constructive criticism i must say lol . Religious agendas? lol granted my beliefs are rooted in my religion do you have anything other than that to criticise .. like my points for example.. there is a stunning ad hominem i see here
like " you have religious reasons hence your points are invalid "
thats quite the lack of wisdom
evolution as an empirical process is a fact
but human-chimp common ancestry isn't
and even universal common ancestry isn't
any such cliam made is made on an assumption to construct explanation
just because something has a well elaborate explanation doesn't mean its a concrete fact at best its an acceptable explanation which can be disregarded
a scientific theory is not a fact black and white
i'm just saying folks have the right to deny some idea that isn't even concrete let alone complete and has fundamental assumptions in it like "assuming common ancestry", "homology ", "natural selection is the only proper mechanism deriving evolution " ,"there are only naturalistic explanations ".
to say that its a fact shows ignorance and coupled that with arrogance you get Darwinists.
i don't wanna argue with you on this it doesn't seem like it'd be going anywhere
but here's the gist of what is scientifically valid coming from an academic professional in the realm himself as he quotes sources. its a 10 minute video
hope you have the time, patience and the judgment to proceed with this