- Status
First off - You're all welcome for finding the Serial Killer. My strategy worked flawlessly, even Finalbeta adopted it. All who doubted me before can now apologize and I'll let bygones be bygones.
Joking aside - I don't think we should look at this too seriously. We lucked into getting Celestia lynched and even then it was randomized. Don't go patting ourselves on the back over a flaw blossoming into fortunate events. I will say I am especially suspicious of @Gambit and @Haku going into this day. Gambit tries to say that "his plan worked, suspecting people to cause chaos.." Alright, bullshit on that. That's code for "I had no idea / I was slinging shit without reason". I don't trust that statement nor how it was made quickly to try and cover his day 1 play style where he made numerous enemies.
And Haku - no comments in the first day and then suddenly says "we" did it? No, Haku. we did it. You sat back and observed, as you've done since your first post. Why not contribute more? I am immediately suspicious of anyone who decides to get active now of all times.
THE DOC DEBATE - I don't know why people think it's confirmed that FB was hit / saved by the doctor. If Mafia was targeting active users, myself, @Kiwipom, @Naomi, @Gambit would all surely be at risk due to our pages of debate. True FB was active too, I'd wager not quite as much as we were till the end. What better way to make a stir then to try and kill one of us?
All in all - I find myself disliking @playa4321 and @Gambit's excuses for their random votes and hostile attitudes. It's a convenient shield, especially for Playa who disappears after changing his vote and stirring controversy. I am confident that Bogard, Naomi, Kiwi and possibly Reborn are all good. Reborn still throws me through a loop but I am willing to be benevolent.
@Rej I'm mixed on.
Vote Lynch @playa4321 @Izumi for the reasons Bogard listed.
If I didn't articulate myself clearly enough for the DOC DEBATE, let's not make the assumption FB is cleared/good because of the fact he accused a player last minute of Day 1. That's dangerous logic that could bite us in the ass.
Joking aside - I don't think we should look at this too seriously. We lucked into getting Celestia lynched and even then it was randomized. Don't go patting ourselves on the back over a flaw blossoming into fortunate events. I will say I am especially suspicious of @Gambit and @Haku going into this day. Gambit tries to say that "his plan worked, suspecting people to cause chaos.." Alright, bullshit on that. That's code for "I had no idea / I was slinging shit without reason". I don't trust that statement nor how it was made quickly to try and cover his day 1 play style where he made numerous enemies.
And Haku - no comments in the first day and then suddenly says "we" did it? No, Haku. we did it. You sat back and observed, as you've done since your first post. Why not contribute more? I am immediately suspicious of anyone who decides to get active now of all times.
THE DOC DEBATE - I don't know why people think it's confirmed that FB was hit / saved by the doctor. If Mafia was targeting active users, myself, @Kiwipom, @Naomi, @Gambit would all surely be at risk due to our pages of debate. True FB was active too, I'd wager not quite as much as we were till the end. What better way to make a stir then to try and kill one of us?
All in all - I find myself disliking @playa4321 and @Gambit's excuses for their random votes and hostile attitudes. It's a convenient shield, especially for Playa who disappears after changing his vote and stirring controversy. I am confident that Bogard, Naomi, Kiwi and possibly Reborn are all good. Reborn still throws me through a loop but I am willing to be benevolent.
@Rej I'm mixed on.
Vote Lynch @playa4321 @Izumi for the reasons Bogard listed.
Post automatically merged:
If I didn't articulate myself clearly enough for the DOC DEBATE, let's not make the assumption FB is cleared/good because of the fact he accused a player last minute of Day 1. That's dangerous logic that could bite us in the ass.
As you already said, I was busy last DP so couldn’t post much.
Believe me or not, i was about to post when Playa voted for me. And as I said last DP, I had a very busy day so couldn’t post until I got home.
As for this DP, I just answered Gambit’s question and gave my thoughts on who I think is scum, after that, nothing happened. So there was really nothing to post.
Believe me or not, i was about to post when Playa voted for me. And as I said last DP, I had a very busy day so couldn’t post until I got home.
As for this DP, I just answered Gambit’s question and gave my thoughts on who I think is scum, after that, nothing happened. So there was really nothing to post.
I literally acknowledge that it was you guys that did. I said we got a scum because town got a scum and I consider my self to be art of town... Lol you are suspicious of anyone that starts been active now? I have been busy, should I go inactive again, I have stuff to do, it will be my pleasure... 
So what I am getting is that Playa, was being aggressive and flopping and shifting votes with no reason with the excuse of putting pressure and getting a reactions?
Post automatically merged:
So what I am getting is that Playa, was being aggressive and flopping and shifting votes with no reason with the excuse of putting pressure and getting a reactions?
Last edited:
I literally acknowledge that it was you guys that did. I said we got a scum because town got a scum and I consider my self to be art of town... Lol you are suspicious of anyone that starts been active now? I have been busy, should I go inactive again, I have stuff to do, it will be my pleasure...
So what I am getting is that Playa, was being aggressive and flopping and shifting votes with no reason with the excuse of putting pressure and getting a reactions?
Post automatically merged:
So what I am getting is that Playa, was being aggressive and flopping and shifting votes with no reason with the excuse of putting pressure and getting a reactions?
That's flawed logic tbh. Either you should be suspicious of those as well who became inactive but were active on day 1 or the best would be keeping your mind open to not fall for any bait.
With that said, I agree that we should not assume anything regarding fb lynching Celestia and no Nk last night, but frankly speaking fb is giving me town vibe more than being a scum.
And, yes playa is definitely suspicious but there is something about him which is giving me town vibe. Just an intuition. I will wait for his response before I cast my vote
With that said, I agree that we should not assume anything regarding fb lynching Celestia and no Nk last night, but frankly speaking fb is giving me town vibe more than being a scum.
And, yes playa is definitely suspicious but there is something about him which is giving me town vibe. Just an intuition. I will wait for his response before I cast my vote
Alright, i see playa getting hanged. He could be town who did baiting more then needed. plus he took his vote off near end when called out. so slight sus of him. But at same time if he town scum would see him as easy target, beside town who find him sus.
Also why the hell are you going for tac? I have not seen any sus on him imo.
He is suspicious because of well known reasons. But the reasons aren't sufficient to portray him scum.
His tactic for pressure vote was for reactions and then he got busy which he admitted. So, we should give him benefit of doubt like we gave it to others as many users bar me, kiwi, Naomi and tac got inactive.
Now, what suspicious of him is that he still have no suspect which I don't believe. And, he hardly made any contribution in day2. This is weird from a guy who was on lynching marathon to get reactions. Why suddenly playing safe?
But I don't know why I am getting townie vibe from him. It's just an intuition. I am not inclined towards lynching him and will wait for his reactions
His tactic for pressure vote was for reactions and then he got busy which he admitted. So, we should give him benefit of doubt like we gave it to others as many users bar me, kiwi, Naomi and tac got inactive.
Now, what suspicious of him is that he still have no suspect which I don't believe. And, he hardly made any contribution in day2. This is weird from a guy who was on lynching marathon to get reactions. Why suddenly playing safe?
But I don't know why I am getting townie vibe from him. It's just an intuition. I am not inclined towards lynching him and will wait for his reactions
I was suspicious of Playa from day 1 but what is keeping me on the fence is: will mafias really put so much attention on themselves?
I think @Naomi 's has a point, Playa might just baited too much
Plus, there's many other players that are playing it safe which to me is more scummy than someone outright acting suspicious
I think @Naomi 's has a point, Playa might just baited too much
Plus, there's many other players that are playing it safe which to me is more scummy than someone outright acting suspicious
Actually the point right there you made, he still has not replied yet. plus you are right he did not contribute and it looks like today will be same. If he gonna play like that prob sure sign he scum. unless he explains.
Post automatically merged:
wait he did, but low post then nothing.
Post automatically merged:
@playa4321
any reads? from first day and today?
Tbh, I don't blame users finding him suspicious. He has been highly inconsistent in his posting. Also, we really don't have any lead on mafia. That's why I said earlier, 'explore all possibilities because then only we can get correct picture'
More than Playa, I want to hear @Finalbeta take on this because he was the one who got sk in first place.
More than Playa, I want to hear @Finalbeta take on this because he was the one who got sk in first place.
I’m sus of Playa and Gambit because both of them pushed a lynch on the same person but with such plain reasons, it looked like that they wanted to force a lynch on Kiwi, like scum buddies. But obviously I can be wrong (actually is very possible that I’m wrong lol) and they were just unfortunate with their reasoning.
I agree with Reborn, it’s not enough to give Playa a death sentence but he is probably the one looking more scummy here.
I won’t place a vote on him until he appears again because I know very well what is to be busy.
I agree with Reborn, it’s not enough to give Playa a death sentence but he is probably the one looking more scummy here.
I won’t place a vote on him until he appears again because I know very well what is to be busy.
- Status