You accused two of us who judged Don based on his previous game play. What else can I judge him over?
Then you acted like two roles is preposterous, which we also saw isn't true. You fired back at NW right away just for that comment.
You're not your usual calm King self.
Hahaha Lanji, you are the god of mafia, I swear. That Shanks finishes it off perfectly.
mafia will sometimes back up townies under fire, but do it in a passive way
like, "Yeah I know he's scummy but like my reads kinda tell me that they're town"....like try to argue that they're town but only putting in half of the effort hoping they will get lynched anyways. So when they do, they can play the "I told you guys so!" card. This is a case of tmi.
Also, trying to stop him from claiming could also benefit mafia because claiming tend to clear a person or at least let others reconsider their votes. Which will derail the lynch wagon.
As for the dupe roles, I already addressed that.
a) I don't like the ToL to ToS comparison
b) last ToS game didn't have dupe roles
c) my only reason for believing Don rn is because of his claim, so if someone claims bg too, I don't have any reason to believe Don because nothing else holds up. So it's not so much about me being against dupe roles, but Don losing all of his credibility
d) I'm not dismissing the idea of dupe roles. I just believe it should be something that we consider when we come across them
And I like
@Yo Tan Wa 's point that the people who would benefit from arguing that there's dupe roles are scums