No to the last one for sure. Final did get a little overly defensive, but the way I read Cin’s posts definitely sounds like he goaded him on a couple of times. I’m still not sure about anything, but I’m leaning towards Cin as scum right now. Cornering Final could be a ploy, since it seems like Cin has a good read on his gameplay and reactions, so that we end up mislynching Final like he flat out suggested.
I wake up and notice that Natalija is still obnoxiously trying to defend Cinera by pushing a nonsense "you were too strong" narrative on me when I had been limiting myself to address Cinera's fallacies instead, which is a very common game feature and I was in no way overly defensive.
But the funny part is that she votes me despite I had never voted Cinera.
So exactly @Natalija who is the one trying hard here?
Anyway, my position on inactivity is that like fluff posting, it's unhelpful. It's very difficult to build reads on inactive players (as they haven't said much). Furthermore, if all inactive players are given a pass, scum can easily hide amongst them. Inactivity is uncooperative at best.
I don't like this post .
If you were active before that and posting jokes/gifs I would understand
But like you never said anything useful so far and instead of sharing thoughts u just go and post a gif
Spite lynching shows no class. If its due to beta just being unhelpful regardless of his role I can understand but if its due to spite that thats not a good idea.
eh it is not spite but more like last game when he was scum he went lowkey and lurked so he won't be sused I am just pressuring him I guess to stay active
I don't like this post .
If you were active before that and posting jokes/gifs I would understand
But like you never said anything useful so far and instead of sharing thoughts u just go and post a gif
eh it is not spite but more like last game when he was scum he went lowkey and lurked so he won't be sused I am just pressuring him I guess to stay active
Yea cuz new players can't be scums ??
you still voting TAC on a joke or what ?
Do you have anything to add other than that
From what I have seen so far I think FB sound more like town
And Cin idk I have seen him using that logic before but I feel I need to read more from him
Unvote FB
On the other hand I don't like how Rayan playing
Too lowkey and his vote on jew only cuz he lynched new player
I haven't seen him contributing more
Light with his fluff at the start when he did more efforts before in other games
Yeah, I don't really get your case against TAC. It seemed to me like it was obviously a joke and that you appear to be intent on keeping it comes across as weird.
Yeah, I don't really get your case against TAC. It seemed to me like it was obviously a joke and that you appear to be intent on keeping it comes across as weird.
I think this should only apply to dead players. Other players and spectators liking posts shouldn't matter IMO.
Anyway, my position on inactivity is that like fluff posting, it's unhelpful. It's very difficult to build reads on inactive players (as they haven't said much). Furthermore, if all inactive players are given a pass, scum can easily hide amongst them. Inactivity is uncooperative at best.
Well not much has happened. The only thing of note was you vs FB. Your argument seemed consistent with previous games.
FB seemed a bit weird though. His vocab went up like two stages from how he normally posts. The use of the term 'a priori' was also a bit weird. I've only seen you use it on this forum. So perhaps this was a shot at you?
In any event it doesn't strike me as town vs town. Unless there was some previous antagonism between you two that I am unaware of.
I don't like this post .
If you were active before that and posting jokes/gifs I would understand
But like you never said anything useful so far and instead of sharing thoughts u just go and post a gif
I wake up and notice that Natalija is still obnoxiously trying to defend Cinera by pushing a nonsense "you were too strong" narrative on me when I had been limiting myself to address Cinera's fallacies instead, which is a very common game feature and I was in no way overly defensive.
But the funny part is that she votes me despite I had never voted Cinera.
So exactly @Natalija who is the one trying hard here?
To me it seems that Natalija is compulsively attempting to deflect attention from Cinera since many people have been sus'ing him.
Obnoxiously??? Compulsively?? You really do want me to vote for you, but why.
Wut, I don’t need you to vote for Cinera to suspect you, that’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard in there few games
You’re not dumb, so you’re doing it on purpose.
Well not much has happened. The only thing of note was you vs FB. Your argument seemed consistent with previous games.
FB seemed a bit weird though. His vocab went up like two stages from how he normally posts. The use of the term 'a priori' was also a bit weird. I've only seen you use it on this forum. So perhaps this was a shot at you?
In any event it doesn't strike me as town vs town. Unless there was some previous antagonism between you two that I am unaware of.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.