And the hostages can easily be coerced too -- but such things are just overlooked in favour of the narrative you wish to believe. The difference here is, I don't want one side to be right. I am pretty confident both are wrong. I don't have any skin in this game, so to speak.
The Hostages were freed and are home now. What is this, wireless coercion?

I hate this narrative of "both are wrong".
Were vietnamese wrong when USA invaded and fought back making death traps in the jungle?
Were partisans wrong when they were fighting Nazi using guerrilla tactics?
There is a strength unbalance, it's not a videogame.
 
The Hostages were freed and are home now. What is this, wireless coercion?

I hate this narrative of "both are wrong".
Were vietnamese wrong when USA invaded and fought back making death traps in the jungle?
Were partisans wrong when they were fighting Nazi using guerrilla tactics?
There is a strength unbalance, it's not a videogame.
When the situation calls for it, I will certainly say both are wrong. If you can outright deny what Hamas did then you're no different from those who deny the holocaust happened. It doesn't agree with what you want reality to be, so you claim it's all propaganda, conspiracy, and latch onto any argument irrespective of the veracity of the claims or where the information was sourced from.

Fucking hell bro.
 
Is this the same video evidence that "proves" the beheadings? The women raped in the streets, when the hostage says that they were eating, they were attended by doctors and living almost the same quality of life as the Hamas terrorists?
When you use as a casus belli something that gets proven a lie, you cannot be surprised that the public opinion will start to revalue your "evidence".
Specially with video surfacing of IDF shooting during the Hamas attack.
There’s video and medical evidence of Hamas beheadings. Literally journalist have reported on this



and ffs the hostages have family still under captivity. Of course they won’t talk shit about Hamas
 
When the situation calls for it, I will certainly say both are wrong. If you can outright deny what Hamas did then you're no different from those who deny the holocaust happened. It doesn't agree with what you want reality to be, so you claim it's all propaganda, conspiracy, and latch onto any argument irrespective of the veracity of the claims or where the information was sourced from.

Fucking hell bro.
Are you uncapable of reading, my friend? Are you perhaps a Naruto fan?
Read what I write:
I believe what I see.
And what I see is that there were no beheaded children, no raped women and the hostages claim themselves to be treated with respect.
There was a terror attack at that party lead by Hamas and IDF fought back.
Then a technological giant started bombing a country with no water access, hospitals, churches and apartments.
What am I denying?
I am denying that there were beheadings and raping in the streets, because there are 0 pictures and 0 videos of it.
All the while, I write that Hamas led a terror attack?
Why so defensive?
 
Are you uncapable of reading, my friend? Are you perhaps a Naruto fan?
Read what I write:


What am I denying?
I am denying that there were beheadings and raping in the streets, because there are 0 pictures and 0 videos of it.
All the while, I write that Hamas led a terror attack?
Why so defensive?
Perhaps I am defensive because you're essentially stating that you can't blame him for doubting any terror attack happened because of something you believe (no beheadings, etc).

Maybe I am defensive of the clear denial of culpability from one side, but a willing demonization of another group (which has been in the wrong in many ways, btw).

Maybe I'm sick of this Islamist v Christian/Jewish/Zionist/West/White/Athiest Etc Etc.

It's so fucking divisive and the double standards are just plain as day.
 
There’s video and medical evidence of Hamas beheadings. Literally journalist have reported on this



and ffs the hostages have family still under captivity. Of course they won’t talk shit about Hamas
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...oundtable-jewish-community-leaders-rcna119865
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023...e House has walked,leaders at the White House.

There is no evidence.
Just like you should not trust Hamas propaganda, you shouldn't trust the other side.
 
Perhaps I am defensive because you're essentially stating that you can't blame him for doubting any terror attack happened because of something you believe (no beheadings, etc).

Maybe I am defensive of the clear denial of culpability from one side, but a willing demonization of another group (which has been in the wrong in many ways, btw).

Maybe I'm sick of this Islamist v Christian/Jewish/Zionist/West/White/Athiest Etc Etc.

It's so fucking divisive and the double standards are just plain as day.
I understand that you might be frustrated about the situation and I frankly understand, I don't want to engage in hostile conversation about sensitive topics.
But just as I find hard to believe Hamas propaganda, I don't trust IDF's propaganda.
If evidence is there, just like there is evidence of churches being bombed and water being cut out, I'll be the first to look at it and condemn,
[automerge]1698165109[/automerge]
The 40 babies story is something else, there were definitely beheadings going on.
Source: Roo on Worstgen
 
Top