When the situation calls for it, I will certainly say both are wrong. If you can outright deny what Hamas did then you're no different from those who deny the holocaust happened. It doesn't agree with what you want reality to be, so you claim it's all propaganda, conspiracy, and latch onto any argument irrespective of the veracity of the claims or where the information was sourced from.
Fucking hell bro.
Fucking hell bro.
Read what I write:
I believe what I see.
And what I see is that there were no beheaded children, no raped women and the hostages claim themselves to be treated with respect.
There was a terror attack at that party lead by Hamas and IDF fought back.
Then a technological giant started bombing a country with no water access, hospitals, churches and apartments.
And what I see is that there were no beheaded children, no raped women and the hostages claim themselves to be treated with respect.
There was a terror attack at that party lead by Hamas and IDF fought back.
Then a technological giant started bombing a country with no water access, hospitals, churches and apartments.
I am denying that there were beheadings and raping in the streets, because there are 0 pictures and 0 videos of it.
All the while, I write that Hamas led a terror attack?
Why so defensive?