Genetic difference, again, doesn't mean different races. There is more in common between a black african and a white american than two king pinguins. So et's stop the discussion here.
No it does not. Its not race its ORIGINS. again, stop with the racists comments.
Yes I read, contrary to you, and you are still confusing race with skin colors and social ethnecity origins.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aan8433
Its literally a scientific paper mate. If you wanna play ignorance, please do it with more subtility.
There is absolutely no need for your relative to be with another skin color to create a colored baby, in fact it can skip generations.
Learn about science bro. Or don't talk at all.
I'm not a liberal, so you are not talking to me here. But continue and I will call you far rightist for real this time.
What you don't understand is that "woke" people are in fact fighting for people to DEinvisibilize the history and the culture of black communities.
So you are saying literally the opposite of what we are trying to do. Simply because you are ignorant about the subject and you don't understand our fight at all.
We on the contrary recognize the existence of black people as a LEGITIMATE social group of people that have rights and need, oncontrary to you who just see them as a different race like the racist you seems to be.
This explain why you have such an horrible vision on human's rights.
No, sometimes its just the case of an internet harassment.
You should look around you, nature lover. Maybe take a look at humans for once
https://jaapl.org/content/early/2023/02/23/JAAPL.220078-22
She most likely suffered violences and sexual trauma so take those words out of you sexist mouth please.
Wealth do not negate violeces and sexual abuses. So stop with this incel rethoric.
The status co is men like you calling women "bitch".
You refuse to see the harm online harrassment can do, in fact you are complicit of propagating incel rethoric that helps this kind of behavior to flourish. You are the problem here dear far right activist.
This is only the vision of people like you, incel that are ignorant about our fights and values. You have been "brainwashed" so much by far right rethoric that you can't see that we also fight for men in general.
I guess you will never understand.. and that's pretty sad.
We don't care about imagery, we only care about the fight. If our vision was hegemonic, we wouldn't need to fight racist and sexist guys like you.
Your problem is that you think the right is about conservatism. You are completely ignorant (once again) about what makes the right, the right.
THe right is the representation of values opposed to the left, those values include, individuality, absolute freedom, libertarianism, economic liberalism and most of all meritocracy. What you are talking about are the value of the far right and the very conservative right.
And yes, society evolved toward more progress, the family structure didn't disappear, it just changed and the right changed with it.
Those who didn't changed are the more conservative ones and the far rightist like yourself.
If nobody here "buy my bullshit" here, how can you say that my vision is the status co ?
Don't you feel like there is a contradiction here ?
Or do you really blindly believe that this forum is made of far right rebels that are fighting the status co ?
You just quote me three progressive vision. This is but 5 % of every issues. And even on those three progressive vision Biden is not acting properly.
I quote you a lot more REAL values that we are opposed with against liberals, but no, your problems is feminism, transgenderism and BLM, three BASIC progressive stuff that everyone should agree on no matter the political spectrum.
You are complaintly ignoring meritocracy, liberalism, ultra capitalism, the collusion with far right gov, the interor and exterior poor policy for non priviledged people, and in case of France the collusion with the far right, the racists laws the anticonstitutional reforms, the deny of democracy..
You are completely failing to see that we completely oppose liberalism because you can't look past simple progressive data like feminism or antiracism.
You have a lot of cognitive bias problems mate.
No mate but rest in ignorant in you want to..
So you want to call an entire group X depise the fact that this entire group is saying to you "we are not X" ?
Ok.. but I call that intellectual lazyness and far right thinking.
Not one people, the left is a coherent group. I speak here in the name of ALL leftist : We CAN'T stand liberals (and far rightist like you, but that out of the point)
The problem is that you don't understand basic political definition
You don't have to determine language in the first place. Liberalism is used to define leftist only by the far right and ultra conservative/confusionnist, others sides of the political spectrum knowwhat liberalism means.
If nobody is the far right for you, then yes, I don't use those definitions. Simply because they are incorrect with reality.
One thing you are right about is that liberalism had multiple meaning over history. But the thing you are failing to understand is that the root of the values of liberalism are directly opposed to the values of leftist. So they can't coexist.
But since you refuse to understand reality, you will never understand these differences of values.
Liberals are not conservative, even if conservatives can also be ultra liberals. Liberals are the group between the center and the conservative. They are the entry rightist. So I won't call Tucker Carlson a liberal. Tucker Carlson is a far right activist.
Yeah, its seems, there is a communication problem on your end, I understand perfectly your points, but you completely fail to understand mines. And I know its not me not being clear enough as when I talk with other people, they can understand. its you who have a cognitive bias problem, those bias completely blinds your vision of reality.
Therefore you refuse to understand - despite me explaining clearly to you why and how - that nowaday leftists completely oppose liberalism.
Liberalism of France and the US are similar. The only differences is that Biden is just a little bit more open on progressive question than Macron, that's all, both are horrible in term of liberalism values
Don't worry, its only you who don't understand the term, leftist of the united state also agrees that liberalism is problematic.
Confusionnism might have french roots, but its a political words that describe political process that are present ALL OVER THE WORLD.
So the moment I give you a definition and an explaination of the process (I did) you shouldn't have problems with that word unless you are targeted by it (and you are, so your reaction is logical). Your lack of understanding of the concept now that it was explained is on you.
No, progressism is not something only reserved to the left, the right can also be progressive. (not the conservative one, only the liberals)
The far right has a set of specific values. I don't call far right someone with just conservative or liberals values, I call them far right because they have values that are seen as far right ALL OVER the western world.
Because biden is a liberal progressist. he understand the value of progressism so he won't go far right, but he won't make the effort to act toward real progress
(note that biden is still supporting the far right in Israel) AGAINST the left's interests.
Of course I won't disapprove everything he says, he is liberal not a conservative. He can still have progressive ideas so they should count. The problems is that its only a very little % of his ideas. In reality he uses like Macron ultra liberalism and the collusion with far right like in Israel.
As long as people like Biden will be meritocrate apologist, they will be on the sides of liberals, therefore, the right side (opposed to our side, where meritocracy is something of the past)
Because its better to vote for a liberal rather than letting the far right win. Even if I disagree with everything Macron is saying, I will still vote for him if he ends up against the far right. That's just the right thing to do.
The problem in the united state is that election are corelated with money and lobbying so the left (who gets logically less support from rich people who don't want there money to go away) gets less visibility so less people are voting for people like Sanders for example.
The smithsonian doesn't say that race exist, only you come to this conclusion. Again, genetic difference or variations doesn't meant different of races.
No, nazism still means nazism.
Not everybody , just the part where you are advocating the reality of races in the human species.. just like racist and therefore, Nazis... sorry if you don't like that.
There is not "redifinition" of racism. Racism as always been defined by science as a system of domination. You just heard an retained a vulgarized and somehow incomplete version from school.
Actually yes it is
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...ar-to-be-in-a-coma-may-actually-be-conscious/
Consciousness is a trait of humanity even for people in coma.
No its not. Again, its only killing a bunch of skin+electrical activity which has a 100% rate of becoming a human. Its not a human yet, therefore it can't be called a child.
No, its a living POTENTIAL human, its not human yet. It only has the biological POTENTIAL characteristics of a human. It has not developped all human cahracteristic yet so its not fully human.
Yes, and like them I agree with that consensus. Life beginning at fertilization doesn't negate the right for abortion.
Yup, showing the characteristic of a psychopath please. (psychopathy is something defined in psychology, its not some random stupid set of actions)
Actually I heard this recording, and yes, she did hit him, that's something she didn't deny. This actually show that she was violent as well, just like the testimony of the psychologist of the couple was saying so.
But again, this doesn't negate the abuse she suffered too. it just means that Deep was abused too.
The problem comes when the public states that depp was a victim while Heard was the only abuser, which is false and systematically representative of the value we give to women testimonies.
Reports. After that, its in the hands of the staff.
They already did. A trans woman is a woman. Period. That's scientifically established.
And sex is not just "male" or "female", its a set of characteristic that can change.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
I'm talking about consistant people. Prolife are not consistant people.
I wasn't talking about haplogroups here, but the search for the skin color of ancestor in dna (which is as far as I know, something possible to do - even tho I didn't found researches about that, so i'll stay careful about that affirmation)
Yes you are right, I shouldn't have said "nature" but "flora". The fauna needs us to be careful about it, not flora.
No it does not. Its not race its ORIGINS. again, stop with the racists comments.
Yes I read, contrary to you, and you are still confusing race with skin colors and social ethnecity origins.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aan8433
Its literally a scientific paper mate. If you wanna play ignorance, please do it with more subtility.
There is absolutely no need for your relative to be with another skin color to create a colored baby, in fact it can skip generations.
Learn about science bro. Or don't talk at all.
I'm not a liberal, so you are not talking to me here. But continue and I will call you far rightist for real this time.
What you don't understand is that "woke" people are in fact fighting for people to DEinvisibilize the history and the culture of black communities.
So you are saying literally the opposite of what we are trying to do. Simply because you are ignorant about the subject and you don't understand our fight at all.
We on the contrary recognize the existence of black people as a LEGITIMATE social group of people that have rights and need, oncontrary to you who just see them as a different race like the racist you seems to be.
This explain why you have such an horrible vision on human's rights.
No, sometimes its just the case of an internet harassment.
You should look around you, nature lover. Maybe take a look at humans for once
https://jaapl.org/content/early/2023/02/23/JAAPL.220078-22
She most likely suffered violences and sexual trauma so take those words out of you sexist mouth please.
Wealth do not negate violeces and sexual abuses. So stop with this incel rethoric.
The status co is men like you calling women "bitch".
You refuse to see the harm online harrassment can do, in fact you are complicit of propagating incel rethoric that helps this kind of behavior to flourish. You are the problem here dear far right activist.
This is only the vision of people like you, incel that are ignorant about our fights and values. You have been "brainwashed" so much by far right rethoric that you can't see that we also fight for men in general.
I guess you will never understand.. and that's pretty sad.
We don't care about imagery, we only care about the fight. If our vision was hegemonic, we wouldn't need to fight racist and sexist guys like you.
Your problem is that you think the right is about conservatism. You are completely ignorant (once again) about what makes the right, the right.
THe right is the representation of values opposed to the left, those values include, individuality, absolute freedom, libertarianism, economic liberalism and most of all meritocracy. What you are talking about are the value of the far right and the very conservative right.
And yes, society evolved toward more progress, the family structure didn't disappear, it just changed and the right changed with it.
Those who didn't changed are the more conservative ones and the far rightist like yourself.
If nobody here "buy my bullshit" here, how can you say that my vision is the status co ?
Don't you feel like there is a contradiction here ?
Or do you really blindly believe that this forum is made of far right rebels that are fighting the status co ?
You just quote me three progressive vision. This is but 5 % of every issues. And even on those three progressive vision Biden is not acting properly.
I quote you a lot more REAL values that we are opposed with against liberals, but no, your problems is feminism, transgenderism and BLM, three BASIC progressive stuff that everyone should agree on no matter the political spectrum.
You are complaintly ignoring meritocracy, liberalism, ultra capitalism, the collusion with far right gov, the interor and exterior poor policy for non priviledged people, and in case of France the collusion with the far right, the racists laws the anticonstitutional reforms, the deny of democracy..
You are completely failing to see that we completely oppose liberalism because you can't look past simple progressive data like feminism or antiracism.
You have a lot of cognitive bias problems mate.
No mate but rest in ignorant in you want to..
So you want to call an entire group X depise the fact that this entire group is saying to you "we are not X" ?
Ok.. but I call that intellectual lazyness and far right thinking.
Not one people, the left is a coherent group. I speak here in the name of ALL leftist : We CAN'T stand liberals (and far rightist like you, but that out of the point)
The problem is that you don't understand basic political definition
You don't have to determine language in the first place. Liberalism is used to define leftist only by the far right and ultra conservative/confusionnist, others sides of the political spectrum knowwhat liberalism means.
If nobody is the far right for you, then yes, I don't use those definitions. Simply because they are incorrect with reality.
One thing you are right about is that liberalism had multiple meaning over history. But the thing you are failing to understand is that the root of the values of liberalism are directly opposed to the values of leftist. So they can't coexist.
But since you refuse to understand reality, you will never understand these differences of values.
Liberals are not conservative, even if conservatives can also be ultra liberals. Liberals are the group between the center and the conservative. They are the entry rightist. So I won't call Tucker Carlson a liberal. Tucker Carlson is a far right activist.
Yeah, its seems, there is a communication problem on your end, I understand perfectly your points, but you completely fail to understand mines. And I know its not me not being clear enough as when I talk with other people, they can understand. its you who have a cognitive bias problem, those bias completely blinds your vision of reality.
Therefore you refuse to understand - despite me explaining clearly to you why and how - that nowaday leftists completely oppose liberalism.
Liberalism of France and the US are similar. The only differences is that Biden is just a little bit more open on progressive question than Macron, that's all, both are horrible in term of liberalism values
Don't worry, its only you who don't understand the term, leftist of the united state also agrees that liberalism is problematic.
Confusionnism might have french roots, but its a political words that describe political process that are present ALL OVER THE WORLD.
So the moment I give you a definition and an explaination of the process (I did) you shouldn't have problems with that word unless you are targeted by it (and you are, so your reaction is logical). Your lack of understanding of the concept now that it was explained is on you.
No, progressism is not something only reserved to the left, the right can also be progressive. (not the conservative one, only the liberals)
The far right has a set of specific values. I don't call far right someone with just conservative or liberals values, I call them far right because they have values that are seen as far right ALL OVER the western world.
Because biden is a liberal progressist. he understand the value of progressism so he won't go far right, but he won't make the effort to act toward real progress
(note that biden is still supporting the far right in Israel) AGAINST the left's interests.
Of course I won't disapprove everything he says, he is liberal not a conservative. He can still have progressive ideas so they should count. The problems is that its only a very little % of his ideas. In reality he uses like Macron ultra liberalism and the collusion with far right like in Israel.
As long as people like Biden will be meritocrate apologist, they will be on the sides of liberals, therefore, the right side (opposed to our side, where meritocracy is something of the past)
Because its better to vote for a liberal rather than letting the far right win. Even if I disagree with everything Macron is saying, I will still vote for him if he ends up against the far right. That's just the right thing to do.
The problem in the united state is that election are corelated with money and lobbying so the left (who gets logically less support from rich people who don't want there money to go away) gets less visibility so less people are voting for people like Sanders for example.
The smithsonian doesn't say that race exist, only you come to this conclusion. Again, genetic difference or variations doesn't meant different of races.
No, nazism still means nazism.
Not everybody , just the part where you are advocating the reality of races in the human species.. just like racist and therefore, Nazis... sorry if you don't like that.
There is not "redifinition" of racism. Racism as always been defined by science as a system of domination. You just heard an retained a vulgarized and somehow incomplete version from school.
Actually yes it is
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...ar-to-be-in-a-coma-may-actually-be-conscious/
Consciousness is a trait of humanity even for people in coma.
No its not. Again, its only killing a bunch of skin+electrical activity which has a 100% rate of becoming a human. Its not a human yet, therefore it can't be called a child.
No, its a living POTENTIAL human, its not human yet. It only has the biological POTENTIAL characteristics of a human. It has not developped all human cahracteristic yet so its not fully human.
Yes, and like them I agree with that consensus. Life beginning at fertilization doesn't negate the right for abortion.
Yup, showing the characteristic of a psychopath please. (psychopathy is something defined in psychology, its not some random stupid set of actions)
Actually I heard this recording, and yes, she did hit him, that's something she didn't deny. This actually show that she was violent as well, just like the testimony of the psychologist of the couple was saying so.
But again, this doesn't negate the abuse she suffered too. it just means that Deep was abused too.
The problem comes when the public states that depp was a victim while Heard was the only abuser, which is false and systematically representative of the value we give to women testimonies.
Reports. After that, its in the hands of the staff.
They already did. A trans woman is a woman. Period. That's scientifically established.
And sex is not just "male" or "female", its a set of characteristic that can change.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
I'm talking about consistant people. Prolife are not consistant people.
I wasn't talking about haplogroups here, but the search for the skin color of ancestor in dna (which is as far as I know, something possible to do - even tho I didn't found researches about that, so i'll stay careful about that affirmation)
Yes you are right, I shouldn't have said "nature" but "flora". The fauna needs us to be careful about it, not flora.
Last edited:
