According to my art interpretation scaling, ChatGPT >>>>>Oda >>>>>Professional drawers at Toei
I know who I'm trusting
It took me only one question to get an unreliable answer from ChatGPT:
(Dinosaurs never went extinct as birds are theropods).
Another example more pertinent to our discussion:
Indeed, that makes sense...
...Oh, no...! But wait...
...ChatGPT, you're starting to sound nonsensical...
...Oh, damn! I guess I was wrong, but hang on a second...
...But, ChatGPT, that's exactly what I said to Critical Mindset and company, are you betraying them...?
It takes four simple questions to make ChatGPT change its opinion; in quite a turncoat way, I must say. Which is why, yes, maybe you people should trust what 99,99% of readers interpreted from the scene, and what 100% of professional drawers adapting it interpreted too when they had to adapt the panels, instead of, again, an unreliable tool which can't even answer my dinosaurs question correctly.