Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
You do understand that it's not because Trump says that he is not a warmonger that he is not, right ?
A little reminder that the first plague of the year of doom was Trump almost starting an all out war with Iran.
Progressive doesn't mean good. It means aimed toward progress. She is a liberal but a progressive one (when Macron is a conservative liberal). She is just much more preferable than Trump, it's not even a debate.
A little reminder that the first plague of the year of doom was Trump almost starting an all out war with Iran.
Progressive doesn't mean good. It means aimed toward progress. She is a liberal but a progressive one (when Macron is a conservative liberal). She is just much more preferable than Trump, it's not even a debate.
Throwing around buzzwords like "warmonger" has 0 meaning, think about this rationally. The death of Soleimani was one of the few significat acts of warfare of his presidency and it didn't even have much of a consequence. On the other hand, after 5 years of Biden we are on te brink of WWIII. Trump doesn't seem to have much interest in going to war with Russia and China, at least for now, and probably not in the spawn of his last presidency if he wins. The Democrats want to either go to war or at least pilot Europe into it while they sit in the back. It's basically suicidal for an European to want Kabalah to win.
Btw yeah Trump seems to approve the genocide in the Middle East and while it's very sad, it's a position shared by both candidates and it can't be stopped by this election. Let's be rational and at least try to keep ourselves alive for now, wishing for our own destruction won't bring any benefit.
Btw yeah Trump seems to approve the genocide in the Middle East and while it's very sad, it's a position shared by both candidates and it can't be stopped by this election. Let's be rational and at least try to keep ourselves alive for now, wishing for our own destruction won't bring any benefit.
In this context, I use "conservatism" and "progressism" not as status but political vectors.
In this sence, you can be a progressist and be a Taliban or a communist and a conservatist. What I'm talking about here is the vector of the political leanance.
Harris is a liberal that has the mind turn toward the left where liberals like Macron are the opposite. EVEN if technically, they are both problematic on a social stance.
Of course. But there is a context behind that. A context that was growing during Trump's presidency. In the same context, Trump would be in the same position. Simply because they are both turned toward imperialism.
In this sence, you can be a progressist and be a Taliban or a communist and a conservatist. What I'm talking about here is the vector of the political leanance.
Harris is a liberal that has the mind turn toward the left where liberals like Macron are the opposite. EVEN if technically, they are both problematic on a social stance.
Of course. But there is a context behind that. A context that was growing during Trump's presidency. In the same context, Trump would be in the same position. Simply because they are both turned toward imperialism.
If you wanna fave Kamela you don't need to justify yourself, your problem as I said. But cut the crap and stop wasting my time with this context bullshit, one day you people accuse him of being Putin's girlfriend and the other day he somehow made the "context", whatever it is, that bought us to war and somehow he's more responsible for this than Biden.
VP; senator and future president :)
She is better than Macron in the sence that she is actually trying to do something about minorities (coming from one herself). When Macron is doing nothing, worse, is trying to attack them directly.
Again. you don't understand what I mean by political vector. It means the way the political cursor will tend to go in the case of an evolution.
Harris is most likely to go toward progressism rather than conservatism. I could be wrong of course but in ALL WAYS she is a better fit for the post than Donald Trump and there should not even be one debate about this.
You should KNOW and FULLY understand the importance of NEVER EVER letting a leway or a vote to the far right and the fact that they are in NO WAY comparable.
She is better than Macron in the sence that she is actually trying to do something about minorities (coming from one herself). When Macron is doing nothing, worse, is trying to attack them directly.
Again. you don't understand what I mean by political vector. It means the way the political cursor will tend to go in the case of an evolution.
Harris is most likely to go toward progressism rather than conservatism. I could be wrong of course but in ALL WAYS she is a better fit for the post than Donald Trump and there should not even be one debate about this.
You should KNOW and FULLY understand the importance of NEVER EVER letting a leway or a vote to the far right and the fact that they are in NO WAY comparable.
So you're basically admitting you don't know her policy beliefs and what she actually wants to do as president. I do understand your dumbass "vector" analogy, you simply use it trying to argue that she is a step in the right direction, which I might agree with. But you STILL just say shit based on your gut feeling, not based on facts. Which leads me to believe you don't actually care about policy, you just care about the vibe.