Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
This is horribly flawed. It invites what happens often which is excessive violence and force. When it is not necessary.
Also it puts way too much power in the hands of whoever gets to dictate how much force is necessary which is also proven to be heavily criticized. A possibly violent situation huh? To whom? And who is deeming something as violent when it is just personal bias against the other?
Also it puts way too much power in the hands of whoever gets to dictate how much force is necessary which is also proven to be heavily criticized. A possibly violent situation huh? To whom? And who is deeming something as violent when it is just personal bias against the other?
Should have stayed in Ukraine 
He does have a point but at the same time he has a VERY one sided view on the issue and world politics altogether.
'Participate in ONE war to defend the human rights of everyone in the world'
Just another ignorant, uneducated American. It's sad.
He does have a point but at the same time he has a VERY one sided view on the issue and world politics altogether.
'Participate in ONE war to defend the human rights of everyone in the world'
Just another ignorant, uneducated American. It's sad.
Post automatically merged:
Last edited:
Should have stayed in Ukraine
He does have a point but at the same time he has a VERY one sided view on the issue and world politics altogether.
'Participate in ONE war to defend the human rights of everyone in the world'
Just another ignorant, uneducated American. It's sad.
He does have a point but at the same time he has a VERY one sided view on the issue and world politics altogether.
'Participate in ONE war to defend the human rights of everyone in the world'
Just another ignorant, uneducated American. It's sad.
Post automatically merged:
Trump is not talking about cold blooded murderer here. He is talking about some people who come illegally.
He said : "brutally murdered by an illegal alien animal" NOT "brutally murdered by a migrant, which makes him an animal"
The link CLEARLY goes as > Illegal alien > Murderer > Animal.
The context is CLEAR. And you MISSED IT. Anyone with a semblant of logic and brain can understand why Trump is making a link between what he call "illegal alien" (which is in itself a dehumanization) and murderers.
BUT EVEN without that context, calling people animal, even murderer. Is simply the most intellectually lazy and fallacious thing to do. Trump is using fascistic rethoric (yes, even for criminals) It dehumanize completely the person and therefore prevent us COMPLETELY from understanding the act. And thus perfectly justify any sanction that could be given to the person, even torture.
I now know exactly what kind of person you are.
He said : "brutally murdered by an illegal alien animal" NOT "brutally murdered by a migrant, which makes him an animal"
The link CLEARLY goes as > Illegal alien > Murderer > Animal.
The context is CLEAR. And you MISSED IT. Anyone with a semblant of logic and brain can understand why Trump is making a link between what he call "illegal alien" (which is in itself a dehumanization) and murderers.
BUT EVEN without that context, calling people animal, even murderer. Is simply the most intellectually lazy and fallacious thing to do. Trump is using fascistic rethoric (yes, even for criminals) It dehumanize completely the person and therefore prevent us COMPLETELY from understanding the act. And thus perfectly justify any sanction that could be given to the person, even torture.
I now know exactly what kind of person you are.
when Trump's security saw him he ran away. What a coward.I did. He was talking about a murderer.
But as explained. He did not say "a migrant who murdered" BUT "an illegal alien animal who murdered".
In other words, when we analyze those words and rethoric, Trump says that it's because the guy was an animal that he murdered, not because he was a flawed human. (And he uses "illegal alien" a dehumanization term) This is a fascistic rethoric.
This puts all migrant in danger.
But as explained. He did not say "a migrant who murdered" BUT "an illegal alien animal who murdered".
In other words, when we analyze those words and rethoric, Trump says that it's because the guy was an animal that he murdered, not because he was a flawed human. (And he uses "illegal alien" a dehumanization term) This is a fascistic rethoric.
This puts all migrant in danger.
Last edited:
He said she was murdered by an illegal alien animal. That doesn't mean that all illegals are animals, it means that animal is an illegal alien who shouldn't even have been in America. You always brag about being educated but can't even spell basic English and don't even know shit about semantics. Educate yourself before making false allegations.
Of course it does ! It associates the meaning that Migrant (who are illegal alien in his book) are animal and ONE OF THEM murdered.
Dude, learn rethoric. And learn how words work in context with each others.
And EVEN if he truly do not mean it (even if it what he says), he still dehumanize a murderer, which IS a fascistic rethoric in itself since it allow anyone to think that murderer are sub humans and therefore do not have the same rights.
Again.. this is how fascists work. I could give you plenty example in the world of today starting with Netanyahou that dehumanize the Palestinian resistance because a large group of them commited war crimes and uses that to justify ANY kind of repression and oppression including the genocide of Palestinian that he associate to the fighters.
Again. Words have meaning. Words have CONTEXT.
You ask me the context without even understanding the context in which the contextual sentence is used in the first place and how it is tied to a racist, antimigrant, and fascistic rethoric.
Let me remind you that just because Trump said that Haitian were eating animals based on nothing but a rumor, those communities are now facing violences, oppression by neoNazis and bomb threats while being scared for their life. JUST BECAUSE OF A FEW WORDS.
A guy literally call those people the hardcore N word on live television. And you are telling me that it is not what he really means ?
Wake the F up.
Dude, learn rethoric. And learn how words work in context with each others.
And EVEN if he truly do not mean it (even if it what he says), he still dehumanize a murderer, which IS a fascistic rethoric in itself since it allow anyone to think that murderer are sub humans and therefore do not have the same rights.
Again.. this is how fascists work. I could give you plenty example in the world of today starting with Netanyahou that dehumanize the Palestinian resistance because a large group of them commited war crimes and uses that to justify ANY kind of repression and oppression including the genocide of Palestinian that he associate to the fighters.
Again. Words have meaning. Words have CONTEXT.
You ask me the context without even understanding the context in which the contextual sentence is used in the first place and how it is tied to a racist, antimigrant, and fascistic rethoric.
Let me remind you that just because Trump said that Haitian were eating animals based on nothing but a rumor, those communities are now facing violences, oppression by neoNazis and bomb threats while being scared for their life. JUST BECAUSE OF A FEW WORDS.
A guy literally call those people the hardcore N word on live television. And you are telling me that it is not what he really means ?
Wake the F up.