You're a not particularly smart individual with some serious mental problems
It's always fun to wake up and read nice words
Btw, sorry to tell you this, but the dunning Kruger effect is... well.. not really what you think it is. Did you read the page you shared ?
You're a not particularly smart individual with some serious mental problems, that especially thinks of himself as way smarter than you are in reality. Both in your trolling attempts and in your attempts at serious posts.
You are in fact a perfect example of intellectual mediocrity. Some superficial book knowledge without any kind of depth or deeper understanding of it, which simply doesn't translate to the real world.
If I had to make an educated guess based on the way you argue (you're not even understanding how superficial you are to begin with), you're probably even a bit below average when it comes to logical and critical thinking.
I was waiting some arguments, but no, you were just here to roast lol. Good attempt. Not very subtle, but quite spicy. You had a lot of anger to share it seems.
You are completely ignorant about cryptocurrency. It's a decentralized tech. Nobody can break it's cryptography either, this is why bitcoin is safe and govs hate it: THEY CAN'T CONTROL IT. It's the same for the internet for the most part.
I'm not going to argue with you about capitalism x communism. You already proved yourself immune to logic and facts. I thought you matured a bit, it seems i was mistaken.
Well, this was my last attempt with you..
I'm so sorry
He's so dedicated to the ideas of his radical leftist bubble (and therefore also the "enemies" of their ideals), that he perfectly plays into the hands of the real establishment without realizing this himself.
By doing what exactly ?
Come on genius. Explain us how capitalism and meritocracy or even Billionnaires benefit from people like me wanting to destroy that system.
It's like saying "I am an atheist but I believe there is a god"
Like no, you are a theist you just dont believe in the gods humans worship
Atheism is the absence of belief. It's not the presence of a belief in nothing. The world doesn't revolves around believers.
Ok, but what did the first person who determined the concept of racism as something systematic? He make inferences with another concepts.
To grasp the concept of racism someone need to understand before the concept of system, ethnicities, population, injury, suffering, injustice, etc
Not necessarily.
A major thing that you will understand if you start to have a materialistic approach of the fight against oppression is that there is ONE very big dynamic that must be understood to understand how those systems of oppression (like systemic racism came to be):
The concept of
domination relationships.
Through the lens of domination relationship, you will be able to understand very clearly that - for ex - racism is not some form of accident that was spread around the world like a virus after some bad scientific researches. It's a system of hierarchization of individual that was USED to assert a domination on people and it is this usage that created the systemacity of the racism we know today.
It is documented that the goal of scientific racism (what created systemic racism) was always to justify discriminations and inequality along with colonizations. And it is still used today - more inconsciously - to justify a form of domination.
This dynamic that exist with racism also exist with different systems of Oppressions:
> Meritocracy and capitalism : Those are systems of domination that justify exploitations of worker and the bourgoisie owning the means of productions
> Ableism : Is a system of domination highly related to capitalism to justify capitalism and attack people who are seen as non productive members of society or even those who are not normative.
> Patriarchy : Is a system of domination of men over women. It's not just sexism, it's an entire set of behaviors, beliefs, systemic advantage and oppressions that are made to legitimate the power of men over women in society (it can also be seen as a way for the system to assert the power of strong men over weak men in society > which is one of the component of fascism btw)
> Post-Colonialism : Is a form of domination of colonial country over other in an economic and structural way through the actions of a few.
> Imperialism : Is a form of legitimization of the domination of a culture over others and the legitimization of the destruction of cultures that are seen as inferior.
> Heteronormativity : Is also a system of domination. While more abstract, this one legitimize the domination of the normative gender roles and gender identities over the others and justify their destructions. A common form of heteronormativity is the assumption that everyone is hetero until proven otherwise for ex.
To grasp the concept of racism someone need to understand before the concept of system, ethnicities, population, injury, suffering, injustice, etc
I can grasp this concept only with this inferential process. The material causes aren't relevant you got it?
But you are right in the sence that yes. To really understand racism, you need a LOTS of knowledge on other subject too (oppressions/sociology/systemism/colonialism/capitalism etc.)
Hence why it is so difficult - and even impossible - for me to convince some people here because they are refusing the entire process while talking about a concept.
It's another reasons why I explain to
@Germinator that it was impossible to became a radical leftist in only one night starting from conservatism. There is too much to understand.
