Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Ok, but what did the first person who determined the concept of racism as something systematic? He make inferences with another concepts.
To grasp the concept of racism someone need to understand before the concept of system, ethnicities, population, injury, suffering, injustice, etc
I can grasp this concept only with this inferential process. The material causes aren't relevant you got it?
To grasp the concept of racism someone need to understand before the concept of system, ethnicities, population, injury, suffering, injustice, etc
I can grasp this concept only with this inferential process. The material causes aren't relevant you got it?
What is this "extreme right wing" you speak of? There is no international right wing movement. Conservative movements are local and nationalistic. There is nothing similar to the behemoth that is the left in the other side of the political spectrum. Every time i see the term "extreme right wing" being thrown around, it's the left media trying to demonize and paint conservatives as radicals. Don't fall for the propaganda, my guy. You are smarter than that.
[automerge]1736011863[/automerge]
The genesis story is most likely a metaphor. Evolution and religion can coexist.
[automerge]1736011863[/automerge]
The genesis story is most likely a metaphor. Evolution and religion can coexist.
Last edited:
It's always fun to wake up and read nice words
Btw, sorry to tell you this, but the dunning Kruger effect is... well.. not really what you think it is. Did you read the page you shared ?
I was waiting some arguments, but no, you were just here to roast lol. Good attempt. Not very subtle, but quite spicy. You had a lot of anger to share it seems.
Well, this was my last attempt with you..
I'm so sorry
By doing what exactly ?
Come on genius. Explain us how capitalism and meritocracy or even Billionnaires benefit from people like me wanting to destroy that system.
Atheism is the absence of belief. It's not the presence of a belief in nothing. The world doesn't revolves around believers.
Not necessarily.
A major thing that you will understand if you start to have a materialistic approach of the fight against oppression is that there is ONE very big dynamic that must be understood to understand how those systems of oppression (like systemic racism came to be):
The concept of domination relationships.
Through the lens of domination relationship, you will be able to understand very clearly that - for ex - racism is not some form of accident that was spread around the world like a virus after some bad scientific researches. It's a system of hierarchization of individual that was USED to assert a domination on people and it is this usage that created the systemacity of the racism we know today.
It is documented that the goal of scientific racism (what created systemic racism) was always to justify discriminations and inequality along with colonizations. And it is still used today - more inconsciously - to justify a form of domination.
This dynamic that exist with racism also exist with different systems of Oppressions:
> Meritocracy and capitalism : Those are systems of domination that justify exploitations of worker and the bourgoisie owning the means of productions
> Ableism : Is a system of domination highly related to capitalism to justify capitalism and attack people who are seen as non productive members of society or even those who are not normative.
> Patriarchy : Is a system of domination of men over women. It's not just sexism, it's an entire set of behaviors, beliefs, systemic advantage and oppressions that are made to legitimate the power of men over women in society (it can also be seen as a way for the system to assert the power of strong men over weak men in society > which is one of the component of fascism btw)
> Post-Colonialism : Is a form of domination of colonial country over other in an economic and structural way through the actions of a few.
> Imperialism : Is a form of legitimization of the domination of a culture over others and the legitimization of the destruction of cultures that are seen as inferior.
> Heteronormativity : Is also a system of domination. While more abstract, this one legitimize the domination of the normative gender roles and gender identities over the others and justify their destructions. A common form of heteronormativity is the assumption that everyone is hetero until proven otherwise for ex.
But you are right in the sence that yes. To really understand racism, you need a LOTS of knowledge on other subject too (oppressions/sociology/systemism/colonialism/capitalism etc.)
Hence why it is so difficult - and even impossible - for me to convince some people here because they are refusing the entire process while talking about a concept.
It's another reasons why I explain to @Germinator that it was impossible to became a radical leftist in only one night starting from conservatism. There is too much to understand.
Btw, sorry to tell you this, but the dunning Kruger effect is... well.. not really what you think it is. Did you read the page you shared ?
I was waiting some arguments, but no, you were just here to roast lol. Good attempt. Not very subtle, but quite spicy. You had a lot of anger to share it seems.
Well, this was my last attempt with you..
I'm so sorry
By doing what exactly ?
Come on genius. Explain us how capitalism and meritocracy or even Billionnaires benefit from people like me wanting to destroy that system.
Atheism is the absence of belief. It's not the presence of a belief in nothing. The world doesn't revolves around believers.
Not necessarily.
A major thing that you will understand if you start to have a materialistic approach of the fight against oppression is that there is ONE very big dynamic that must be understood to understand how those systems of oppression (like systemic racism came to be):
The concept of domination relationships.
Through the lens of domination relationship, you will be able to understand very clearly that - for ex - racism is not some form of accident that was spread around the world like a virus after some bad scientific researches. It's a system of hierarchization of individual that was USED to assert a domination on people and it is this usage that created the systemacity of the racism we know today.
It is documented that the goal of scientific racism (what created systemic racism) was always to justify discriminations and inequality along with colonizations. And it is still used today - more inconsciously - to justify a form of domination.
This dynamic that exist with racism also exist with different systems of Oppressions:
> Meritocracy and capitalism : Those are systems of domination that justify exploitations of worker and the bourgoisie owning the means of productions
> Ableism : Is a system of domination highly related to capitalism to justify capitalism and attack people who are seen as non productive members of society or even those who are not normative.
> Patriarchy : Is a system of domination of men over women. It's not just sexism, it's an entire set of behaviors, beliefs, systemic advantage and oppressions that are made to legitimate the power of men over women in society (it can also be seen as a way for the system to assert the power of strong men over weak men in society > which is one of the component of fascism btw)
> Post-Colonialism : Is a form of domination of colonial country over other in an economic and structural way through the actions of a few.
> Imperialism : Is a form of legitimization of the domination of a culture over others and the legitimization of the destruction of cultures that are seen as inferior.
> Heteronormativity : Is also a system of domination. While more abstract, this one legitimize the domination of the normative gender roles and gender identities over the others and justify their destructions. A common form of heteronormativity is the assumption that everyone is hetero until proven otherwise for ex.
But you are right in the sence that yes. To really understand racism, you need a LOTS of knowledge on other subject too (oppressions/sociology/systemism/colonialism/capitalism etc.)
Hence why it is so difficult - and even impossible - for me to convince some people here because they are refusing the entire process while talking about a concept.
It's another reasons why I explain to @Germinator that it was impossible to became a radical leftist in only one night starting from conservatism. There is too much to understand.
Figures.
Kind of hypocritical then to use science for argumentation in the abortion debate when convenient to your position and then turn around to deny well established science like us being evolved primates when inconvenient.
Confirmation bias much.
Also intellect doesnt necessarily entail abstractions, thats just something you insist on. And ironically enough you havent posted any dictionary entries for that while spamming others.
[automerge]1736023083[/automerge]
Atheist means you dont believe in god. Believing there is no god isnt necessarily part of that. There is a distinction made between the two forms of atheism.
Creation is about the beginning of life, evolution isnt. So life itself may have been created and evolution takes placer after that.
Kind of hypocritical then to use science for argumentation in the abortion debate when convenient to your position and then turn around to deny well established science like us being evolved primates when inconvenient.
Confirmation bias much.
Also intellect doesnt necessarily entail abstractions, thats just something you insist on. And ironically enough you havent posted any dictionary entries for that while spamming others.
[automerge]1736023083[/automerge]
Atheist means you dont believe in god. Believing there is no god isnt necessarily part of that. There is a distinction made between the two forms of atheism.
Creation is about the beginning of life, evolution isnt. So life itself may have been created and evolution takes placer after that.
Unlike life beginning at conception, evolution is still a theory, albeit a credible one. I also never "denied" evolution, I am agnostic on the issue and don't really care either way.
Sure, we can sack the word intellect all together. Humans are still capable of knowing in a way that in substantially higher than animals, a capacity which can know universals and engage in abstract thought
And yes, I posted this earlier, the definition for intellect implies a specific kind of capacity of knowing that involved abstraction
intellect
noun
You don't know what the word impossible means. Impossibility entails a casual contradiction like 2+2=5, or something coming from nothing
There is no causal contradiction in someone changing opinions x to opinions y in a short period of time
Sure, we can sack the word intellect all together. Humans are still capable of knowing in a way that in substantially higher than animals, a capacity which can know universals and engage in abstract thought
And yes, I posted this earlier, the definition for intellect implies a specific kind of capacity of knowing that involved abstraction
intellect
noun
- the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters
You don't know what the word impossible means. Impossibility entails a casual contradiction like 2+2=5, or something coming from nothing
There is no causal contradiction in someone changing opinions x to opinions y in a short period of time