You think there was ever a real chance of somebody getting him in a courtroom and making him answer for his company’s numerous and heinous crimes against sick people? They implemented an AI that denied 90 percent of claims submitted to them; as someone who has done a lot of medical billing, I cannot express the full extent of villainy and moral bankruptcy required to do something so patently cruel, a trial and sentencing wouldn’t have been nearly enough of a punishment…that’s the kind of shit God asks you about on Judgment Day, and I don’t think there’s any possible answer to justify any of it. Not saying that killing someone is ever acceptable, but when you’re indirectly responsible for that much death and suffering, it’s a real “Fuck around and find out” scenario in my eyes…
And that's your right to believe so. But you're going onto the slippery slope to justify it.
At this point it's going to possibly create copycats etc. Further towards anarchy.
But it seems to me that it was allowed one way or another. Did police etc not have enough evidence? Was there even a case being brought forth? If there were such a statistic Why weren't there alarm bells etc.
I won't deny that there are things that are broken; That needs fixing, and Preferably with Trump etc in Office, these types of things (Corruptions etc) won't be allowed to fester.
Still my point stands, The dude should have been tried and convicted and to be held behind bars, if whatever charges he may be guilty of stick etc. But now His Murderer shall be behind bars.