If the voting was to be done at that same moment, I would have gone with TAC. Many things changed since that post. I clearly said I’m not convinced of voting anyone at the moment ... at least not compared To how willing I was to vote TAC. You wanted me to tell you who I would vote and I said i wouldn’t, nat said it’s ok if I said what my gut feels and my gut told me to vote Poison.
also, I wouldn’t count myself actively participating until page 30, I said it on numerous occasions, being 13 pages short puts you in an unfavorable situation especially when the first 20-25 pages Are largely based on previous games assumptions but you still have to go through them even if you don’t know what people are talking about is true or not since it’s your first game.
that’s why I told you to give me more time To have a better read on things now that I’m actively participating than to rely on my reads when I was 13 pages behind.
also, I wouldn’t count myself actively participating until page 30, I said it on numerous occasions, being 13 pages short puts you in an unfavorable situation especially when the first 20-25 pages Are largely based on previous games assumptions but you still have to go through them even if you don’t know what people are talking about is true or not since it’s your first game.
that’s why I told you to give me more time To have a better read on things now that I’m actively participating than to rely on my reads when I was 13 pages behind.
Whats not fine is when you say "if I have to go then I will go with this player who isn't your primary sus at all based on some inconsistent reasoning"
You made a choice. No one forced you or had gun over your head to definitely name someone you wanna vote. So you wilfully picked Poison and I was just curious why you did so over zara and cobra.
Also, your reply didn't answer my question at all.
You gave read till page 15.
Later you Reduced sus on tac based on kiwi post made on page 24.
Poison was still active at that time and went inactive a bit later if I remember well.
Then you said you vote poison.
I asked you why?
You said because zara is at least active but poison stirr things and goes inactive.
I quoted your read where you actually sussed zara for deflecting while being active and argued why you placed poison over zara for being inactive as players can be inactive for many reasons.
Then you reply saying you running 13-15 pages behind. You reduced sus on tac based on kiwi post made on page 24, you sussed poison more than zara for inactivity and she went offline after page 24.
And, I really don't understand why you brought up the reason that you are 13-15 pages short and haven't actively caught up as reply to my question to know why you used inactive as reason to sus put poison over zara
Frankly speaking, I am finding you inconsistent.
I will wait for you to catch up and give reads.
But till then
Vote Lynch ali