[FNZ] Super Role Madness Round 12: Death Note
- Thread starter Rej
- Start date
- Status
Well I alrdy mentioned that before when i built my defense agaisnt yours.
Generally I have a strong town read on you and I'd like to include u in my core. Reason for that is your actual case against me and the manner in which you imposed why I could be scum in the TAC approach. You got a point for accusing me there but I'm pretty sure that you failed to see the rationale behind the progression itself. I was testing two rivers there: Melon and TAC. The former was clever enough to let it pass while the latter border lined omgus and panicked in her defense. I was a lil disappointed that you failed to see TAC in that notion.
I was suspecting the inactive ones and coasters to be the suspects today and that includes but not limited to Queen, Cobra, Light, Trig, Zara, and Poison. Whilst TAC is not really lurking, i don't see any intent from him to even solve the game. What he has been doing at this point is throw shade at whoever is suspecting him and I think that that is a strong indicator why he could be scum. His vote on me after yours was really scummy IMO. LOLOLOL. He is prepared to cast that vote anytime soon even before you built around the case. Hence my vote on him.
Furthermore, I am not liking how flower emerged from the sidelines and randomly accuse me of being scum. Again, there's no justification why she sid that and it felt wagon. None of her posts manufactured evidence why Drago thinks he is town but their claim to be masons.
About the masons, let's say that there is, the only persons in the series who I think could be masons are strong candidates of being scums: Rem and Misa.
@Noctis what's the present tally?
Generally I have a strong town read on you and I'd like to include u in my core. Reason for that is your actual case against me and the manner in which you imposed why I could be scum in the TAC approach. You got a point for accusing me there but I'm pretty sure that you failed to see the rationale behind the progression itself. I was testing two rivers there: Melon and TAC. The former was clever enough to let it pass while the latter border lined omgus and panicked in her defense. I was a lil disappointed that you failed to see TAC in that notion.
I was suspecting the inactive ones and coasters to be the suspects today and that includes but not limited to Queen, Cobra, Light, Trig, Zara, and Poison. Whilst TAC is not really lurking, i don't see any intent from him to even solve the game. What he has been doing at this point is throw shade at whoever is suspecting him and I think that that is a strong indicator why he could be scum. His vote on me after yours was really scummy IMO. LOLOLOL. He is prepared to cast that vote anytime soon even before you built around the case. Hence my vote on him.
Furthermore, I am not liking how flower emerged from the sidelines and randomly accuse me of being scum. Again, there's no justification why she sid that and it felt wagon. None of her posts manufactured evidence why Drago thinks he is town but their claim to be masons.
About the masons, let's say that there is, the only persons in the series who I think could be masons are strong candidates of being scums: Rem and Misa.
Post automatically merged:
@Noctis what's the present tally?
Last edited:
hm you seem very genuine here. I think the chances of you flipping scum went down. Like you went from my scum read to like low suspicious. I hope I didn't just get pocketed lol.
I don't agree about Flower, I think the Mason claim is legit. But yes, I did say I have doubts about TAC's change in votes
One more person to keep an eye on is Neutralwatcher:
And there is also Natalija, what do you think about her, Gambit? She seems to not try to gamesolve but mostly just post reactions like Fuji said.
I am ok if any of the above 3 gets lynched. But seeing that there is a wagon on Flower too, I want to see what town says about changing to a different lynch this phase. I don't want people to unvote and we end up with Flower getting lynched because yes, I will choose to lynch Gambit over Flower.
Also, I will try to wake up before end of day but there is a chance I might oversleep lol
the reason is because I feel like Nat and TAC, neither of them have really contributed to scum hunting. While Gambit despite his weird approaches did. Neutralwatcher is also trying but he is very inconsistent and like Reborn pointed out, he is feeling off.
I don't agree about Flower, I think the Mason claim is legit. But yes, I did say I have doubts about TAC's change in votes
One more person to keep an eye on is Neutralwatcher:
And there is also Natalija, what do you think about her, Gambit? She seems to not try to gamesolve but mostly just post reactions like Fuji said.
I am ok if any of the above 3 gets lynched. But seeing that there is a wagon on Flower too, I want to see what town says about changing to a different lynch this phase. I don't want people to unvote and we end up with Flower getting lynched because yes, I will choose to lynch Gambit over Flower.
Also, I will try to wake up before end of day but there is a chance I might oversleep lol
Post automatically merged:
the reason is because I feel like Nat and TAC, neither of them have really contributed to scum hunting. While Gambit despite his weird approaches did. Neutralwatcher is also trying but he is very inconsistent and like Reborn pointed out, he is feeling off.
D
I'd like to talk about TAC for a minute. Very on the fence over this guy.
Wait, how did he play dumb? Just asking out of curiosity.
This read list has me conflicted. My first impression of it was how it was similar to the one he did in the Tokyo Ghoul game. It still is, but not exactly. The other one, it was detailed but he didn't put in as much effort to break down why each player was where they were at. He especially wasn't pulling out quotes on those scum reads either.
But I don't think more effort here supports him the main problem is the effort. I don't think I've ever seen a Town TAC go out of his way to go in-depth like this over his reads. I feel that's it's more scum indicative for him to do this to look contributive, just like he did in the TG game.
And about the reads themselves, they're decent but one I have an issue is the Poison one. Not the scum read, but one of the reasons.
This is very nitpicky over a joke vote on Neutral from Poison. It was pretty clear that she wasn't being serious so this whole stuff about "diverting off to NW" is looking at it way too deeply. I honestly think that this is a fabricated reason not a genuine one.
Why does the Miller claim affect your opinion? It ultimately amounts to nothing. She could honest or she could be lying. Claiming innocent would have the same effect. Not a really fan of how you're looking into it like this when there's nothing to worry about over it. It's a minor thing that barely affects the state of the game. I don't see how it can be an issue.
Tac's general vibe here is very reminiscent to the Naruto game. I can't shake that off. And I'm not one who thinks that Tac is naturally scummy. He isn't. But how he's posting right this game makes me lean bad. The fluff, easy going, tone at the beginning of the game is just like the any scum Tac at the beginning of the game too. How he suspected Zara is almost damn near akin to how he did for Beta last game. An initial sus, questioning, then letting it go without changing much of his read.
And lastly the suspicion on Gambit is very similar to how he suspected Bogard back in TG. Bo suspect him first, Tac gets frustrated at the reasoning provided and both go on a long ramble of back n forth, and then it ends with Tac hard suspecting Bo. Pretty much the same thing right in this game right?
Yeah...I don't really think Tac is town. Vote Lynch TheAncientCenturion
Wait, how did he play dumb? Just asking out of curiosity.
This read list has me conflicted. My first impression of it was how it was similar to the one he did in the Tokyo Ghoul game. It still is, but not exactly. The other one, it was detailed but he didn't put in as much effort to break down why each player was where they were at. He especially wasn't pulling out quotes on those scum reads either.
But I don't think more effort here supports him the main problem is the effort. I don't think I've ever seen a Town TAC go out of his way to go in-depth like this over his reads. I feel that's it's more scum indicative for him to do this to look contributive, just like he did in the TG game.
And about the reads themselves, they're decent but one I have an issue is the Poison one. Not the scum read, but one of the reasons.
This is very nitpicky over a joke vote on Neutral from Poison. It was pretty clear that she wasn't being serious so this whole stuff about "diverting off to NW" is looking at it way too deeply. I honestly think that this is a fabricated reason not a genuine one.
Why does the Miller claim affect your opinion? It ultimately amounts to nothing. She could honest or she could be lying. Claiming innocent would have the same effect. Not a really fan of how you're looking into it like this when there's nothing to worry about over it. It's a minor thing that barely affects the state of the game. I don't see how it can be an issue.
Post automatically merged:
Tac's general vibe here is very reminiscent to the Naruto game. I can't shake that off. And I'm not one who thinks that Tac is naturally scummy. He isn't. But how he's posting right this game makes me lean bad. The fluff, easy going, tone at the beginning of the game is just like the any scum Tac at the beginning of the game too. How he suspected Zara is almost damn near akin to how he did for Beta last game. An initial sus, questioning, then letting it go without changing much of his read.
And lastly the suspicion on Gambit is very similar to how he suspected Bogard back in TG. Bo suspect him first, Tac gets frustrated at the reasoning provided and both go on a long ramble of back n forth, and then it ends with Tac hard suspecting Bo. Pretty much the same thing right in this game right?
Yeah...I don't really think Tac is town. Vote Lynch TheAncientCenturion
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah TAC was my scumbuddy in that game.
I am willing to. Drago raised a good point
I'd like to see what TAC answers tho
also, I want to make sure that Flower doesn't get lynched
I'm gonna log off of this thread for tonight it's lowkey early morning now. I want to see what other townies have to say for their lynch choices. I've already said the people I sussed. I'll try and come back before EoD to make my final verdict
I am willing to. Drago raised a good point
Post automatically merged:
I'd like to see what TAC answers tho
Post automatically merged:
also, I want to make sure that Flower doesn't get lynched
Post automatically merged:
I'm gonna log off of this thread for tonight it's lowkey early morning now. I want to see what other townies have to say for their lynch choices. I've already said the people I sussed. I'll try and come back before EoD to make my final verdict
Last edited:
D
@TheAncientCenturion could you come and say something about the recent events real quick? @Trismegistus same to you.
I'm gonna go to sleep as well. I'm tired.
I'm gonna go to sleep as well. I'm tired.
@Dragomir
Flower and you being masons was kinda unexpected but I buy it. I hope it's true though because if not that's some genius move from you lol
But I believe that you are telling the truth since it would be risky to use this as defense imo
On the TAC and Gambit stuff, I think both of them are scums. So I'm fine with lynching the two
Flower and you being masons was kinda unexpected but I buy it. I hope it's true though because if not that's some genius move from you lol
But I believe that you are telling the truth since it would be risky to use this as defense imo
On the TAC and Gambit stuff, I think both of them are scums. So I'm fine with lynching the two
N
Yeah cannot blame you I play weird today. I dislike some easily read me as solid townie.
Regarding Gambit I thought he kept his vote on TAC which is weird since he read TAC neutral until he said he unvoted then I searched and he voted Flower and had forth and back argument with her so I unvoted Gambit since it makes sense he read TAC Neutral if Gambit changed his vote from TAC to Flower.
What do you think of Melontonin? She rarely contribute, had a weak push against Queen and Didn't mind for L to counterclaim Gambit. Her sus on Gambit also follow other player
Regarding Gambit I thought he kept his vote on TAC which is weird since he read TAC neutral until he said he unvoted then I searched and he voted Flower and had forth and back argument with her so I unvoted Gambit since it makes sense he read TAC Neutral if Gambit changed his vote from TAC to Flower.
What do you think of Melontonin? She rarely contribute, had a weak push against Queen and Didn't mind for L to counterclaim Gambit. Her sus on Gambit also follow other player
- Status