Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
I feel kinda validated right now. Charlie Kirk's murder always bothered me because of the wound itself was very odd, and didnt add up with how his body should've moved if he was shot from the front.
Turns out, the neck wound was actually the exit wound. He was shot in the back of the head/neck, and you can see the bullet trajectory and the skin on his neck stretching outwards if you slow down the video.
Turns out, the neck wound was actually the exit wound. He was shot in the back of the head/neck, and you can see the bullet trajectory and the skin on his neck stretching outwards if you slow down the video.
I love how that Vendal Savage cosplayer thinks he nailed and managed to understand everything while completely ignoring the works of actual political scientists and reworking new concept he just came up with with no actual basis on any kind of work.
Trying to make us believe that somehow the left and the right was simply something related to political parties and not a form of systemic patterns of behaviors related to both progressism and conservatism.
I mean, this bad Francis Lalanne clone literally invisibilized the fact that leftists and marginalized were directly targeted by nazism to explain that naming nazism leftist or rightist was BS. Nazism was rightist, but more so far rightist and fascist. Why ? Because it's rooted into deep liberal, capitalist, eugenistic, and historically conservative idea. That's an historical fact. You can be mad at it, it's reality and the way we describe rightism at the moment.
Trying to defend that fascism was actually anti-individualistic while quoting.... you guessed it : THE FASCIST HIMSELF BENITO MUSSOLINI. Let me repeat: You are sharing a video of someone who is defending that fascism is anti-individualistic (when it's actually the opposite, it's the most individualistic ideology there is) through quoting the guy who made FUCKING FASCIST propaganda.
This medieval knight wanking moron literally holds his entire argument on "Nazism was just authoritarian" while completely invizibilizing the reactionnary ELEPHANT in the room.
Do not trust someone who do not use the work of scholar and suddenly try to make you think that he bypassed the entire knowledge of the world. It's usually pure reactionnary bullshit and it's the case here. And for the fucking love of usopp, don't trust someone who is telling you to help him fight back against the rewriting of history while praising fascists and taking pictures of himself playing with medieval gears to compensate his masculinity complex that will end up on a banner worthy of a first years graphic designer.
There is nothing impartial about what this guy is saying. How can you gobble that without actually taking a step back? Even when I was a conspiracy theorist, I was able to understand when some people went too far...
I'm reformulating: This theory was verified scientifically. Meaning the content of the article I gave you.
Now, what I want to know, is if despite this, will you dissmiss it and why or will you trust it, and why?
Looks like the guy's head literally bends forward and down and his shoulder upward and forward the very instant of the impact and we can even see the effect of projectile that literally sucked the Tshirt toward the point of impact.
A shot from behind would have created a backward and upward tilt of the heah as the neck advance rapidely to the front and his chest should've rise forward and upward.
His body absorbed the entire momentum of the bullet preventing the shot from coming out.
What is your source?
Trying to make us believe that somehow the left and the right was simply something related to political parties and not a form of systemic patterns of behaviors related to both progressism and conservatism.
I mean, this bad Francis Lalanne clone literally invisibilized the fact that leftists and marginalized were directly targeted by nazism to explain that naming nazism leftist or rightist was BS. Nazism was rightist, but more so far rightist and fascist. Why ? Because it's rooted into deep liberal, capitalist, eugenistic, and historically conservative idea. That's an historical fact. You can be mad at it, it's reality and the way we describe rightism at the moment.
Trying to defend that fascism was actually anti-individualistic while quoting.... you guessed it : THE FASCIST HIMSELF BENITO MUSSOLINI. Let me repeat: You are sharing a video of someone who is defending that fascism is anti-individualistic (when it's actually the opposite, it's the most individualistic ideology there is) through quoting the guy who made FUCKING FASCIST propaganda.
This medieval knight wanking moron literally holds his entire argument on "Nazism was just authoritarian" while completely invizibilizing the reactionnary ELEPHANT in the room.
Do not trust someone who do not use the work of scholar and suddenly try to make you think that he bypassed the entire knowledge of the world. It's usually pure reactionnary bullshit and it's the case here. And for the fucking love of usopp, don't trust someone who is telling you to help him fight back against the rewriting of history while praising fascists and taking pictures of himself playing with medieval gears to compensate his masculinity complex that will end up on a banner worthy of a first years graphic designer.
There is nothing impartial about what this guy is saying. How can you gobble that without actually taking a step back? Even when I was a conspiracy theorist, I was able to understand when some people went too far...
I'm reformulating: This theory was verified scientifically. Meaning the content of the article I gave you.
Now, what I want to know, is if despite this, will you dissmiss it and why or will you trust it, and why?
Looks like the guy's head literally bends forward and down and his shoulder upward and forward the very instant of the impact and we can even see the effect of projectile that literally sucked the Tshirt toward the point of impact.
A shot from behind would have created a backward and upward tilt of the heah as the neck advance rapidely to the front and his chest should've rise forward and upward.
His body absorbed the entire momentum of the bullet preventing the shot from coming out.
What is your source?
https://www.newsweek.com/florida-pr...16?utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=reddit_main
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
https://www.newsweek.com/florida-pr...16?utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=reddit_main
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
The current motion of event that is happening right now because of his death is (socially) very similar to what happened in France in 2015 after the shooting of Charlie Hebdo.
And we are still feeling the shockwave of the event. It allowed the far right to completely takeover our mediatic, cultural and political institutions over time.
I'm seeing the same panic, the same urge to explain how this is horrible, the same radicalization toward reactionnarism.. but 10 times harder.. this is not good
Trump will crumble his own base.
As far as I noticed, then Trump is trying to bridge that huge national debt deficit + increase self dependency
- Tariffs (more revenue + forcing Nations to stike better deals)
- that massive bill
- H1B visa hike
To reduce crime, and have more jobs and resources for Americans
- ICE
- stricter rules for universities and immigrants
- pressure on companies
However, these approaches would end up counter productive because they are just knee - jerk reactions.
What America needs is proper policy strategic framework - short term, mid term and long term and work on it for decades.
But Trump is simply not doing that. He's simply working for his own glory.
America as a whole would get more affected by this in all sorts of ways - Inflation, social fault lines, lower employment rate, rise in costs of living, disruptions of supply chain, reduction in investments, isolation at global level and so on...
He's digging his own mess because whatever he's doing will be counter productive in short run and would affect every American regardless of ideology, class and status.
As far as I noticed, then Trump is trying to bridge that huge national debt deficit + increase self dependency
- Tariffs (more revenue + forcing Nations to stike better deals)
- that massive bill
- H1B visa hike
To reduce crime, and have more jobs and resources for Americans
- ICE
- stricter rules for universities and immigrants
- pressure on companies
However, these approaches would end up counter productive because they are just knee - jerk reactions.
What America needs is proper policy strategic framework - short term, mid term and long term and work on it for decades.
But Trump is simply not doing that. He's simply working for his own glory.
America as a whole would get more affected by this in all sorts of ways - Inflation, social fault lines, lower employment rate, rise in costs of living, disruptions of supply chain, reduction in investments, isolation at global level and so on...
He's digging his own mess because whatever he's doing will be counter productive in short run and would affect every American regardless of ideology, class and status.
We all lean on it being staged with a pantsy.
1) the blood splurge is very common with exist wounds
2) Kirk was shot in the spinal cord seeing how he tensed up instead of going limp
3) Looking at the footage frame by frame, you can see something hitting the back of him, and him immediately reacting to the hit with his neck skin stretching outward. Next frame is the exit wound
4) First thing security and FBI did was cameras behind Kirk
5) Feds did nothing to secure the scene and instead, immediate construction. Securing the scene and evidence is the basics.
6) They claim Tyler(the alleged gunman), disassemble his gun, put it in his backpack, then jumped from the roof, ran to the woods, reassembled the gun, and then buried it.
Those of us with even minimal investigation experience thinks its insane.
1) the blood splurge is very common with exist wounds
2) Kirk was shot in the spinal cord seeing how he tensed up instead of going limp
3) Looking at the footage frame by frame, you can see something hitting the back of him, and him immediately reacting to the hit with his neck skin stretching outward. Next frame is the exit wound
4) First thing security and FBI did was cameras behind Kirk
5) Feds did nothing to secure the scene and instead, immediate construction. Securing the scene and evidence is the basics.
6) They claim Tyler(the alleged gunman), disassemble his gun, put it in his backpack, then jumped from the roof, ran to the woods, reassembled the gun, and then buried it.
Those of us with even minimal investigation experience thinks its insane.
MAGA as a term is new, but the foundation of their belief system was laid a long time ago and has been internally reinforced for almost as long…the movement may take a different name and form, but it will always be an ideology of inflicting as much damage on their enemies as possible. To that point, I don’t see righties tripping over their tiny balls while rushing to kiss JD’s feet, he’s a lightweight and wouldn’t be able to energize the base like his boss; Junior and/or Eric will likely try to fill the void that Daddy leaves behind, and like most things they’ve done while under his shadow, they’ll fail spectacularly; the usual also-rans like DeSantiis, Cruz, and Rubio will probably jockey for prime position, the establishment conservatives will pick whichever one plays best to the lowest common denominator, and with any luck, the Democrats will manage to find a better option than Pete Buttigieg (even though plain white men with middle-of-the-road-but-kinda-leftish views are historically very popular choices for president) to wipe the floor with them. We’ll never fully get rid of the unwoke mind virus, I just hope we’ll get back to a point where it exists solely on the fringe instead of front and fucking center 
And, Left
I don't know but what I have seen is (could be wrong) that Left has become more of a party of minority rights and welfare. They are still stuck in attacking the right on ideological front than actually addressing the elephant in the room - economic crisis.
At the end of the day, regardless of ideology, country, class, status, race, caste, sex - people desire jobs, businesses, good income and higher standards of living, better opportunities for education and self or family growth, savings, moderate inflation and so on...
However, Left doesn't come up with strong vision for these issues at all - issues which affect everyone economically.
And, right - they feed on this vacuum.
I don't know but what I have seen is (could be wrong) that Left has become more of a party of minority rights and welfare. They are still stuck in attacking the right on ideological front than actually addressing the elephant in the room - economic crisis.
At the end of the day, regardless of ideology, country, class, status, race, caste, sex - people desire jobs, businesses, good income and higher standards of living, better opportunities for education and self or family growth, savings, moderate inflation and so on...
However, Left doesn't come up with strong vision for these issues at all - issues which affect everyone economically.
And, right - they feed on this vacuum.
I just wouldn’t underestimate him. He has no morals and cares only about power. He hated Trump in the past, now he’s part of the administration.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5133970-vance-khanna-doge-staffer-rehiring/amp/
Bro literally supported hiring a dude that hates his wife and kids. There is probably nothing this man won’t do for a political win.
Shana Tova btw
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5133970-vance-khanna-doge-staffer-rehiring/amp/
Bro literally supported hiring a dude that hates his wife and kids. There is probably nothing this man won’t do for a political win.
Shana Tova btw
What America needs is real, unaltered leftism
That's because you only see the first layer of leftism, the one that is the most vocal because it's the one thing that liberal can use while keeping the status co.
By adressing identity politics individually and not in a materialistic approach, liberals are hijacking leftism for their liberal propaganda. (for ex when you see Harris explain that she is pro-trans, when she has done close to nothing for trans people, it's an exemple of liberal using leftism as a token to promote capitalism)
You could say that progressive rightists (liberals) are using the most obvious leftists point to discredit leftists and steal their place in the political debate.
But trust me, we talk about the danger of capitalism and the current economy crisis ALL the time, to the point where there is even a (problematic) part of extrem-leftism that considers that class-struggle should be prioritized over everything else.
I'm not questionning your expertise. I'm just using basic critical thinking method and my knowledge of basic physic. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
You are claiming something that goes against the official version, what can be seen in real life, experts and even turning point america themselves. So I'm asking your sources.. that's only fair.
That's because you only see the first layer of leftism, the one that is the most vocal because it's the one thing that liberal can use while keeping the status co.
By adressing identity politics individually and not in a materialistic approach, liberals are hijacking leftism for their liberal propaganda. (for ex when you see Harris explain that she is pro-trans, when she has done close to nothing for trans people, it's an exemple of liberal using leftism as a token to promote capitalism)
You could say that progressive rightists (liberals) are using the most obvious leftists point to discredit leftists and steal their place in the political debate.
But trust me, we talk about the danger of capitalism and the current economy crisis ALL the time, to the point where there is even a (problematic) part of extrem-leftism that considers that class-struggle should be prioritized over everything else.
I'm not questionning your expertise. I'm just using basic critical thinking method and my knowledge of basic physic. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
You are claiming something that goes against the official version, what can be seen in real life, experts and even turning point america themselves. So I'm asking your sources.. that's only fair.