Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
I'm not talking about Karl Marx or his work. Bu technically, what he pointed out with historical materialism is in fact... factual lol
What is there to trust ?
The content. The theory of the capitals (which was verified btw)
So, do you trust it or do you prefer to dissmiss it and if that's the case, why?
What is there to trust ?
The content. The theory of the capitals (which was verified btw)
So, do you trust it or do you prefer to dissmiss it and if that's the case, why?
I feel kinda validated right now. Charlie Kirk's murder always bothered me because of the wound itself was very odd, and didnt add up with how his body should've moved if he was shot from the front.
Turns out, the neck wound was actually the exit wound. He was shot in the back of the head/neck, and you can see the bullet trajectory and the skin on his neck stretching outwards if you slow down the video.
Turns out, the neck wound was actually the exit wound. He was shot in the back of the head/neck, and you can see the bullet trajectory and the skin on his neck stretching outwards if you slow down the video.
I love how that Vendal Savage cosplayer thinks he nailed and managed to understand everything while completely ignoring the works of actual political scientists and reworking new concept he just came up with with no actual basis on any kind of work.
Trying to make us believe that somehow the left and the right was simply something related to political parties and not a form of systemic patterns of behaviors related to both progressism and conservatism.
I mean, this bad Francis Lalanne clone literally invisibilized the fact that leftists and marginalized were directly targeted by nazism to explain that naming nazism leftist or rightist was BS. Nazism was rightist, but more so far rightist and fascist. Why ? Because it's rooted into deep liberal, capitalist, eugenistic, and historically conservative idea. That's an historical fact. You can be mad at it, it's reality and the way we describe rightism at the moment.
Trying to defend that fascism was actually anti-individualistic while quoting.... you guessed it : THE FASCIST HIMSELF BENITO MUSSOLINI. Let me repeat: You are sharing a video of someone who is defending that fascism is anti-individualistic (when it's actually the opposite, it's the most individualistic ideology there is) through quoting the guy who made FUCKING FASCIST propaganda.
This medieval knight wanking moron literally holds his entire argument on "Nazism was just authoritarian" while completely invizibilizing the reactionnary ELEPHANT in the room.
Do not trust someone who do not use the work of scholar and suddenly try to make you think that he bypassed the entire knowledge of the world. It's usually pure reactionnary bullshit and it's the case here. And for the fucking love of usopp, don't trust someone who is telling you to help him fight back against the rewriting of history while praising fascists and taking pictures of himself playing with medieval gears to compensate his masculinity complex that will end up on a banner worthy of a first years graphic designer.
There is nothing impartial about what this guy is saying. How can you gobble that without actually taking a step back? Even when I was a conspiracy theorist, I was able to understand when some people went too far...
I'm reformulating: This theory was verified scientifically. Meaning the content of the article I gave you.
Now, what I want to know, is if despite this, will you dissmiss it and why or will you trust it, and why?
Looks like the guy's head literally bends forward and down and his shoulder upward and forward the very instant of the impact and we can even see the effect of projectile that literally sucked the Tshirt toward the point of impact.
A shot from behind would have created a backward and upward tilt of the heah as the neck advance rapidely to the front and his chest should've rise forward and upward.
His body absorbed the entire momentum of the bullet preventing the shot from coming out.
What is your source?
Trying to make us believe that somehow the left and the right was simply something related to political parties and not a form of systemic patterns of behaviors related to both progressism and conservatism.
I mean, this bad Francis Lalanne clone literally invisibilized the fact that leftists and marginalized were directly targeted by nazism to explain that naming nazism leftist or rightist was BS. Nazism was rightist, but more so far rightist and fascist. Why ? Because it's rooted into deep liberal, capitalist, eugenistic, and historically conservative idea. That's an historical fact. You can be mad at it, it's reality and the way we describe rightism at the moment.
Trying to defend that fascism was actually anti-individualistic while quoting.... you guessed it : THE FASCIST HIMSELF BENITO MUSSOLINI. Let me repeat: You are sharing a video of someone who is defending that fascism is anti-individualistic (when it's actually the opposite, it's the most individualistic ideology there is) through quoting the guy who made FUCKING FASCIST propaganda.
This medieval knight wanking moron literally holds his entire argument on "Nazism was just authoritarian" while completely invizibilizing the reactionnary ELEPHANT in the room.
Do not trust someone who do not use the work of scholar and suddenly try to make you think that he bypassed the entire knowledge of the world. It's usually pure reactionnary bullshit and it's the case here. And for the fucking love of usopp, don't trust someone who is telling you to help him fight back against the rewriting of history while praising fascists and taking pictures of himself playing with medieval gears to compensate his masculinity complex that will end up on a banner worthy of a first years graphic designer.
There is nothing impartial about what this guy is saying. How can you gobble that without actually taking a step back? Even when I was a conspiracy theorist, I was able to understand when some people went too far...
I'm reformulating: This theory was verified scientifically. Meaning the content of the article I gave you.
Now, what I want to know, is if despite this, will you dissmiss it and why or will you trust it, and why?
Looks like the guy's head literally bends forward and down and his shoulder upward and forward the very instant of the impact and we can even see the effect of projectile that literally sucked the Tshirt toward the point of impact.
A shot from behind would have created a backward and upward tilt of the heah as the neck advance rapidely to the front and his chest should've rise forward and upward.
His body absorbed the entire momentum of the bullet preventing the shot from coming out.
What is your source?
https://www.newsweek.com/florida-pr...16?utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=reddit_main
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
https://www.newsweek.com/florida-pr...16?utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=reddit_main
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
Florida said no to this?? Fucking FLORIDA?? Maybe the tide really IS turning against Donnie’s cabal…almost a year too late, but who knows what this means for next year
The current motion of event that is happening right now because of his death is (socially) very similar to what happened in France in 2015 after the shooting of Charlie Hebdo.
And we are still feeling the shockwave of the event. It allowed the far right to completely takeover our mediatic, cultural and political institutions over time.
I'm seeing the same panic, the same urge to explain how this is horrible, the same radicalization toward reactionnarism.. but 10 times harder.. this is not good
