Are they different fields tho?
I just wanted to debunk AL's philosophical takes, because I am sure he is also an accumulating being and he knows what's "good" for him.
I just proved that it exists, since I don't get where AL comes from and you seemingly speak up for him lmao.
i dont really care either way, but im not going to believe some supernatural claims about a soul being the reason consciousness can exist just because science can not yet answer the problem of consciousness.
It's a legit questionning but I think it's a step ahead from our current debate. Currently, we are quesitonning the validity of the materiality of the process of consciousness itself under a political lens rather than the qualia (raw feeling of consciousness.) itself
I don't have a definite opinion on the subject. Even tho I lean toward the idea of a false problem & consciousness being an illusion.
Again, matter cannot self-reflect, there must be an immaterial faculty that does that since self reflection is an immaterial process involving concepts, universals, intentionality...
Actually it can, if you consider the hard problem as a false problem or with other types of reasonning. But this is not the subject here. And the potential materiality of a raw feeling does not equate to a divine immaterial condition of consciousness rather something we still don't fully understand yet. On top of that, it's irrelevant politically in our current debate.
i dont really care either way, but im not going to believe some supernatural claims about a soul being the reason consciousness can exist just because science can not yet answer the problem of consciousness.
I'm just curious
According to idealism only conciousness/sujective experience exist. The "physical" would be just a categorical mistake we created because we have the impression that the external objects of our subjective experience should exist beyond our experience
then your quote really sounded confusing, or it was standing without context lol
now I am asking this really out of curiosity, just so we get to know each other better lol, to what kind of persons do you think accumulation is not a good thing?
this analogy only works if what we call self-reflection is a material process which can be found in the brain
it's not, since it involves immaterial actions such as thinking about concepts, choosing between thoughts (which involves the will, also something immaterial), etc.
then your quote really sounded confusing, or it was standing without context lol
now I am asking this really out of curiosity, just so we get to know each other better lol, to what kind of persons do you think accumulation is not a good thing?
"People don't operate by what's right and wrong, but by convenience. They'll say and do whatever they can to reach and justify that convenient outcome."
I'm just curious
According to idealism only conciousness/sujective experience exist. The "physical" would be just a categorical mistake we created because we have the impression that the external objects of our subjective experience should exist beyond our experience
Maybe the people who make money kidnapping children, who work for people who make money sex-trafficking and killing children, are actually the bad guys?
Thank god that, the people who kidnap children and shoot priests in the eye, are saving us from the Jewish guy, who wants old people to be able to retire, gosh.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.