Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
When you think of a triangle, you grasp the concept of triangulation itself, the definition of a triangle
The mind grasps concepts, a concept can't be contained inside matter by definition. It's immaterial. So actions of the mind that work with concepts (such as self-reflection) can't be reduced to material functions.
The mind grasps concepts, a concept can't be contained inside matter by definition. It's immaterial. So actions of the mind that work with concepts (such as self-reflection) can't be reduced to material functions.
im not a fan of philosophy, thats why i said i didnt really care either way. at the end of the day, we dont know. but i have no good reason to believe supernatural claims about consciousness can only come from souls. since that wasnt your point, i jumped to a conclusion based on assumptions, that was my bad.
No. It involves material action. That's what you do not take into account. While the materiality of the subjectivity of the sensation can be questionned through the hard problem, the process behind this action is not extra-natural. It's a consequence of material action and consequences. The will, for ex, is a material process. It's not some extra-dimensional quality of human experience coming from nothing.
lol.
But in reality - all state of consciousness are the result of material process. It's the qualia, the raw feeling, that is questionnable.
It's a vast debate inside the realm of materialism that is already a vast debate.
Fuck ICE
Fuck the IDF
Fuck fascists
A concept is but a projection of a material process, an self-interpretation of reality based on specific parameters. When your brain is wired differently, you interprete reality differently. The material > Creates > The interpretation of the material
I remembered this meme lol
But in reality - all state of consciousness are the result of material process. It's the qualia, the raw feeling, that is questionnable.
It's a vast debate inside the realm of materialism that is already a vast debate.
Fuck ICE
Fuck the IDF
Fuck fascists
A concept is but a projection of a material process, an self-interpretation of reality based on specific parameters. When your brain is wired differently, you interprete reality differently. The material > Creates > The interpretation of the material
I agree, it does involve materiality. But it is above materiality because it pulls forms from matter
Brain -> 5 senses, fires neurons, stores memory, etc.
Mind -> receives info from brain to form concepts, uses concepts to engage in self-reflection
Because materialism is false, there exists form + matter, brain interacts with matter, the mind or self-reflective part of consciousness interacts with the form of matter during thinking/self reflection
Brain -> 5 senses, fires neurons, stores memory, etc.
Mind -> receives info from brain to form concepts, uses concepts to engage in self-reflection
Post automatically merged:
Because materialism is false, there exists form + matter, brain interacts with matter, the mind or self-reflective part of consciousness interacts with the form of matter during thinking/self reflection
LOL CNN censoring the fascism out
The law is like children to them:
They'll twist the law into whatever they want it to be.
Pathetic sycophants censoring truth to suck up to authority.
If we found out CNN and FOX were communing with Goebbels in hell to get tips on how to lie to the public, I would not be surprised.
The law is like children to them:
They'll twist the law into whatever they want it to be.
Pathetic sycophants censoring truth to suck up to authority.
If we found out CNN and FOX were communing with Goebbels in hell to get tips on how to lie to the public, I would not be surprised.
So a mentally ill sociopath killing his wife and 2 children and then killing himself is not evil/wrong, but just a "perspective"?
What about the torturing and abuse cartells in South Korea? What is their perspective?
What about a capable person saving someone's life after a heart attack? Isn't that "good" as per definition?
Post automatically merged:
What AL is saying here I think, he is subjectively practicing "Null Philosophy" and he thinks it's the absolute perspective.
One can say there is no good or bad.
One can argue outside events aren't inherently good or bad...its our perception which add meaning to the outside events.
As perception of everyone differs based on experience, conscience, culture and so on...so, does the meaning they attach to outside events. Thus, one can say there isn't anything good or bad.... right or wrong.
However, I do feel this is partially true. There are certain things which can be argued are inherently wrong....like genocides or inherently good.
That's why you shouldn't listen to apolitical youtubers, specifically when they have ATROCIOUS narrative takes. Jay D completely misses the subtilities of Luffy's character. While Luffy will usually refuse to intervene. This refusal stands on ethical principles of non interference.
Luffy, when presented with the entire context of an injust and oppressive situation, does not wait to intervenene or try to.
The five sense thing is actually a myth. We have so much more senses than that.
Indeed. And the loop is influencing itself
Here you can see the speed of the ball as the nature of the signals, when the signal is X, the ball falls, but when it's Y it goes faster and can influence the trajectory of others signals. As you can see here, a self contained system influencing itself.
Of course there can. Our material interest are determining our ethics.
Luffy, when presented with the entire context of an injust and oppressive situation, does not wait to intervenene or try to.
The five sense thing is actually a myth. We have so much more senses than that.
Indeed. And the loop is influencing itself
Here you can see the speed of the ball as the nature of the signals, when the signal is X, the ball falls, but when it's Y it goes faster and can influence the trajectory of others signals. As you can see here, a self contained system influencing itself.
Of course there can. Our material interest are determining our ethics.
That's why you shouldn't listen to apolitical youtubers, specifically when they have ATROCIOUS narrative takes. Jay D completely misses the subtilities of Luffy's character. While Luffy will usually refuse to intervene. This refusal stands on ethical principles of non interference.
Luffy, when presented with the entire context of an injust and oppressive situation, does not wait to intervenene or try to.
.
Luffy, when presented with the entire context of an injust and oppressive situation, does not wait to intervenene or try to.
.
this does not answer my question at all, but I guess I can accept this out of box take
whether I can add it to my values is another thing
when I think about it, I see it for sure differently
like what Reborn-san is tackling here, "inheritance".
Accumulation into human growth are one thing I consider as inherently good. Without it we wouldn't exist as we are, we probably would have no history books and the concept of teaching and learning would not exist.
Taking this into another direction, like for example in a materialistic-philosophical sense, I personally think that the idea of "overneccessity" is a bad thing. Because it is the root cause of fatigue. Not only fatigue for humans, but fatigue towards bigger structures, mechanisms and concepts.
Just examples if we take the "inheritant" layer of this.
Anyway I am done flexxing. I am short on time lol
whether I can add it to my values is another thing
when I think about it, I see it for sure differently
like what Reborn-san is tackling here, "inheritance".
Accumulation into human growth are one thing I consider as inherently good. Without it we wouldn't exist as we are, we probably would have no history books and the concept of teaching and learning would not exist.
Taking this into another direction, like for example in a materialistic-philosophical sense, I personally think that the idea of "overneccessity" is a bad thing. Because it is the root cause of fatigue. Not only fatigue for humans, but fatigue towards bigger structures, mechanisms and concepts.
Just examples if we take the "inheritant" layer of this.
Anyway I am done flexxing. I am short on time lol