you dont care about truth, otherwise you would be able to admit that an implication is not the same as absolutely knowing thats what sanji meant.
Criticals "evidence" is usually garbage, like spamming pics of shoes from a completely different perspective, spamming pics and videos of his cheerleader friend not even remotely doing what he claims vergo did, and now that anderson silva gif that also isnt remotely the same as the sanji vergo scene.
And its perfectly fine to point out flaws in someones claim without making a counter claim. I dont always have to make a counter claim. Your conclusion about sanjis inner thought is not completely invalid, but you pretend like you know for a fact that thats what he was about and nothing else is possible, and thats just garbage and i therefore point it out.
But good to know that being on the forum for a day gave you enough insight to do a psychological analysis about me
Your point doesn't match the situation, Sanji literally couldn't have been more obvious with his implication. If Sanji is in front of a naked Nami and says "I'm horny, I can't hold myself back", the implication is that he's turned on by Nami, and wants to hit it.
What Sanji said was that level of obvious implication, like there is no reaches that need to be had when Sanji said: "That was bad.... if I had continued that fight....", it's an open and shut meaning.
Critical's picture is relevant, if we were to play into realistic martial arts, sanji's block had more anatomical priority/strength, yet still Vergo came out on top. So you can't just go "no lol", a proper counter argument would be "oda wouldn't think that heavily on it, oda isn't thinking about that, and they are superhumans anyway, oda isn't a professional martial arts, he just meant he kicked and sanji blocked, and vergo's legs were stronger than sanjis, what hit what doesn't matter". See how I brought forth an actual point to counter what he said, that's what you're not doing.
If your friend got in a fight you didn't see, and then said: "That was bad... if I had continued that fight....", would you think "my friend clearly won", or would you think the obvious of "my friend got his ass beat". Vergo essentially dominating Sanji while only using kicks when his actual style uses full body martial arts + a bamboo stick, not to mention the fact that he didn't use rokushiki or busoshoku, means the fight was extremely one sided. It'd be the equivalent of base luffy fighting sanji with only kicks, and having the edge over Sanji. Vergo's legs are more powerful than Sanji's legs, and Sanji's legs are literally the strongest part of him. Imagine if Zoro or Kyros was winning against Sanji using only kicks, no matter how you spin it, Sanji doesn't look good.
People like you are all around the world, people who just want to be right, not correct, people who just say you're wrong when you provide a supported argument, people who are unwilling to change their world view in the face of new evidence.