Powers & Abilities Is Law and the Ope Ope no Mi fair game in the WSS competition?

Dodging the question, great.

Let's ask again and again, until you answer the question: Does Fujitora's gravity fruit only work when Fujitora uses his sword, given he always uses it when using DF powers, even when pulling down meteors? Yes or no? If yes, why do you assume that Law cannot cut without his sword when using his spatial hax within his room?
I’m not dodging the question.

It does not matter. It is completely irrelevant to the conversation. What matters is what is shown;

Fujitora always uses his sword to fight. Always. There is not a single panel of him fighting anyone - the scene with the Sunny is not a fight- without using his sword. Him tossing a meteor at the Sunny is like Zoro occasionally punching, kicking, using a scythe- an outlier. In every face to face fight Fujitora has had- he has used a sword. If Vegapunk was so how able to clone people, and we got swordless Fujitora with any other weapon vs Fujitora with a sword, Fujitora with a sword would win. The same is true for Law. That is what makes them swordsmen.

As for the totally different question that is just the basics of how Law’s DF works- Law cannot dissect people without a blade. That is why he uses his sword every time he does it. There is no reason to think that he could do otherwise.
Post automatically merged:

We all know "Gravity Spoon" is a forbidden technique because it is just too powerful for the one piece world. Fujitora nerfed all of his universe-busting spoon techniques by using a sword instead
Post automatically merged:

Law with his df and his sword vs Law with his df and no sword. Who wins? @comrade
You don’t want to know what Mihawk could do with a spatula
 
I’m not dodging the question.

It does not matter. It is completely irrelevant to the conversation. What matters is what is shown;

Fujitora always uses his sword to fight.
You said, Law cannot perform his cutting abilities without his sword because "he always does so". Now that I refuted your point, you say "it doesn't matter because he uses a sword to fight". So you agree Law can perform his cutting without a sword, since that cutting is spatial hax derived from his DF? Thank you.
 
You said, Law cannot perform his cutting abilities without his sword because "he always does so". Now that I refuted your point, you say "it doesn't matter because he uses a sword to fight". So you agree Law can perform his cutting without a sword, since that cutting is spatial hax derived from his DF? Thank you.
your point is Law can perform his cutting with a sword right? Same goes with Fuji, Fuji can perform his df without a sword and yet Oda made him a swordsman, so Law too is a swordsman

what's your point exactly? you can't argue against Oda's statement
 
bruh, is someone really arguing against Oda statements
:milaugh:
No one argues against Oda's statements. Has Oda stated that using overpowered, haxed DF abilities as a medicore medicore swordsman makes you the deserved WSS, or would Oda himself makde exceptions to the rule by letting Zoro fight opponents whose main/strongest power is based on swordsmanship (doesn't mean the opponent cannot be versatile)?

That's why Zoro's and Law's paths will never cross, even though both are swordsmen of the worst generation who stand next to each other and are of similar caliber. Because Oda understands, that it would be counter intuitive for Zoro to fight for the WSS title facing Law's Ope Ope no Mi.

So can you please stop using the same arguments over and over again like a broken recorder, when I never argued against them in the first place and it was never the point of the thread to begin with? Thanks.

Who is a swordsman and contender for the WSS title:
  • King: he is versatile and uses fire, but he is a contender because his strongest asset is swordsmanship boosted by ancient zoan physicals
  • Shiryu: A powerful swordsman on par with Magellan even before his DF. His swordsmanship is extremely powerful and lethal. His invisibility fruit is just a bonus that makes him harder to tag, hence he still is a contender
Who is a swordsman but arguably not a contender for the WSS title (meaning Oda would not pair Zoro with those characters because it is counter intuitive):
  • Law: for the reasons stated above
  • Kizaru: Also a swordsman but his swordsmanship is too a side power, while he mainly uses a powerful DF revoved on lasers, explosions, light speed kicks, etc.
To name a few.
 
Like, argue that the DF use excludes him, fine. I disagree, because I think it’s very clear that “pure swordsmen” doesn’t matter at all in OP, given the opponents Zoro has faced, and the stuff Zoro himself as done, but I can at least accept that as a sound enough argument.

Don’t try and give me completely moronic hypothetical situations where Law is running around with a fucking bamboo pole like Vergo and is still the exact same fighter capable of the exact same things.
 
H

Haoshoku

Swordsmanship is just a fighting style. Ain’t doing nothing with it alone. You gotta utlize the source(s) of power at hand and use those in conjunction with your swordsmanship. Zoro relies on his immense physical strength, speed and haki in conjunction with his swordsmanship, those components are what make up Zoro as a swordsman. The only difference with Law is that he just uses his DF abilties/haki in conjunction with his swordsmanship.

Take the sword away from him and his utilization of the fruit changes drastically. It’s heavy headcanon territory to assume that Law can replicate all his Ope Ope No Mi attacks ( the vast majority of which involve his sword) in the same exact manner. His swordsmanship has a clear influence on how he utilizes the fruit.

Hell we’ve seen an example of this with Sabo/Ace. Sabo’s fighting style differs from Ace. Once he got the fruit, he used it in conjunction with his dragon claw martial arts and even imbued the fire with his metal pipe. The particular utilization of the fruit’s ability will vary depending upon the fighting style of the user. It doesn’t mean that the user’s fighting style isn’t the main factor in how they fight.
 
No one argues against Oda's statements. Has Oda stated that using overpowered, haxed DF abilities as a medicore medicore swordsman makes you the deserved WSS, or would Oda himself makde exceptions to the rule by letting Zoro fight opponents whose main/strongest power is based on swordsmanship (doesn't mean the opponent cannot be versatile)?
It's true Oda has never made such statement, but the title WSS is literally "World's strongest swordsman" there's no exception in it, every single swordsman will be considered as zoro's rivals in becoming the WSS. Also, "hax" itself is subjective, Fuji's df too is a hax, so Fuji is not zoro's rival? such a silly thinking if you think so
 
I think it’s very clear that “pure swordsmen” doesn’t matter at all in OP
I have claimed nothing else. I haven't say only "pure" swordsmen count. I made a distinction between having versatile abilities as a swordsman, with swordsmanship being (one of) your main and (one of) your strongest abilities, and having swordsmanship as a weak side power that is completely overshadowed by a DF related ability magnitudes above your swordsmanship. Doesn't mean Law is not a swordsman, it just means that Oda will probably not pair Zoro and Law in a duel for the WSS title, because it would be counter intuitive for Zoro to fight for the title facing the Ope Ope no Mi.

Take the sword away from him and his utilization of the fruit changes drastically. It’s heavy headcanon territory to assume that Law can replicate all his Ope Ope No Mi attacks ( the vast majority of which involve his sword) in the same exact manner. His swordsmanship has a clear influence on how he utilizes the fruit.
Sabo enhances his previous fighting style with the Mera Mera no Mi. But Law isn't enhancing anything. Cutting things is purely his DF ability. The cutting comes from his DF alone. That's why he cuts through Vergo's super hard Haki and an entire mountain in the process, using a hakiless, non-graded sword.
 
Top