Then dont claim I'm bias or not reading your posts, nor use my position as a moderator to say I'm close minded just because I disagreed with you.
Well Mihawk has a definitive title with no contradictions so far, except for the things people make up without evidence.
Isn't this the ABC logic you complained about? Saying someone is stronger because they have better feats? I can easily mention BM....Katakuri has way more more feats than King but that doesnt mean he's stronger.
Soda never conveyed any message that says Shanks>Mihawk. You personally find Shanks more impressive which is completely subjective. Mihawk has concrete portrayal thanks to his title.
How is any of this evidence that Shanks>Mihawk or something? This is an assumption. It is a fact that Shanks is a swordsman and Mihawk is called the WSS. Get it?
Different fighting style is irrelevant. It didn't matter for Zoro or his opponents so it shouldn't exempt Shanks. I gave you plenty of evidence as to why that is with Zoro himself and his battles. You gave me none for Shanks.
Whether Shanks or Mihawk won isn't a factor. We know that Shanks is a swordsman and that Mihawk is the WSS. That is evidence. You, once again, use complete assumptions.
We have something called portrayal. It was portrayal that kept Roger as one of the strongest in the series despite his only feat being decapitation by fodder for 950+ chapter. Mihawk's title is his portrayal. The stuff you mention in favor of Shanks are all assumptions with no evidence.
The yonko were never called the strongest. That's a huge misconception. They were called the 4 greatest pirates with the kanji referring to their political power as the Great Politicans.
No contradiction as explained above. And there was no reason whatsoever for you to mention my position. It does nothing but hurt your argument as it makes you come off as petty and that you have no arguments.
So bottom line, it is not an assumption to Mihawk is above Shanks due to WSS title. It's is not bias or close mindedness to say that and there's no hard evidence for Shanks being above Mihawk.
Roger has been shown to literally launch Oden across an island from one swing, who nearly defeated Kaido. So yes, once Mihawk actually has that type of moment, sure. At this point, he does not. And at this point, I will not take a title for which Shanks isn't even shown to be competing for at face value. Its silly to even do so.
Anyway, I'm just gonna put a plug in this and stop here. We keep going but I vastly disagree with most of what you are saying. You say you've given me tons of evidence on things yet where the one place it counts, Mihawk vs Shanks, there is no evidence of the latter losing to the former except a for a title donned to Mihawk, which we dont even know how said title came about. Is it self proclaimed? Was Shanks even competing for it? Did Shanks and Mihawk stop fighting and THEN Mihawk obtained the title by defeating other strong swordsmen?
You are literally assuming just as much as I am, which was my whole point if you, once again, go back to my first post earlier today. Mihawk defeating Shanks is just as much of an assumption as any other possibility happening.
I'm done brah, go ahead and have the last word if you want