Just had a thought.

If the killing in gaza ends once Gaza is fully conquered, wouldn’t that debunk the genocide allegations?

Genocide implies Israel is aiming to eradicate Gazans, not merely win a war or conquer some land.
[automerge]1755487142[/automerge]
Which is probably why I think the UN or the international court or something said there was a possibility of genocide, not that it was happening.

in any case the war is bad and Israel is definitely doing war crimes. But I do see what I mentioned being used as the rationale by America and probably other western nations as to why Israel isn’t committing genocide in their eyes.
Theyre tryin to force palestinians out of their land
that is literal ethnic cleansing (Genocide)
 
To say that's a debunk is... I dunno. It made me think of a dude waiting at a table for his pizza with fork and knife in hand, and then someone saying he isn't waiting for pizza because you don't eat pizza with a fork and knife.
 
The International Court isn’t the only entity that can call something a genocide. A bunch of historians already did call it what it is.
Theyre tryin to force palestinians out of their land
that is literal ethnic cleansing (Genocide)
"Congrats fellas, you won! That means it isn't a genocide!"

Ironically, winners do write history so this isn't even as dumb a take as it looks on the surface
I suppose my one point of contention with the genocide accusation is that if you look at the statistics, it genuinely does not look like Israel is trying to eradicate Gazans.

only 4-5% of Gazans had died in the war. Including Hamas fighters. Whereas the Holocaust killed over 60% of European Jews, with the percent going to 80-90% in some countries. Even if you say the death tolls are underestimates, it is nowhere near as high as the Holocaust. And the holocaust was basically what created the concept of genocide.

That said, it is undeniable that Israel has shown a disregard for civilian life. But I think that is different from a genocide.
[automerge]1755526051[/automerge]
However I’m no scholar. While Gaza might not be comparable to the Holocaust, I suppose it could be comparable to the Bosnian genocide. And I do think this is a point scholars make. But I really haven’t studied the Bosnian genocide, so I can’t speak too much on this.
 

Jew D. Boy

I Can Go Lower
I suppose my one point of contention with the genocide accusation is that if you look at the statistics, it genuinely does not look like Israel is trying to eradicate Gazans.

only 4-5% of Gazans had died in the war. Including Hamas fighters. Whereas the Holocaust killed over 60% of European Jews, with the percent going to 80-90% in some countries. Even if you say the death tolls are underestimates, it is nowhere near as high as the Holocaust. And the holocaust was basically what created the concept of genocide.

That said, it is undeniable that Israel has shown a disregard for civilian life. But I think that is different from a genocide.
[automerge]1755526051[/automerge]
However I’m no scholar. While Gaza might not be comparable to the Holocaust, I suppose it could be comparable to the Bosnian genocide. And I do think this is a point scholars make. But I really haven’t studied the Bosnian genocide, so I can’t speak too much on this.
https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2024/10/22/rabcab-speak-truth/
Wish I could find it, but I saw a video of an Orthodox rabbi talking about how the pictures you see of Palestinians in Gaza look eerily similar to Jews who survived the Holocaust and how he feels sick about others using him and his faith to justify these atrocities…I understand the spirit of what you’re saying, but come on, this is undeniably genocide no matter who tries to downplay it.
 
I suppose my one point of contention with the genocide accusation is that if you look at the statistics, it genuinely does not look like Israel is trying to eradicate Gazans.

only 4-5% of Gazans had died in the war. Including Hamas fighters. Whereas the Holocaust killed over 60% of European Jews, with the percent going to 80-90% in some countries. Even if you say the death tolls are underestimates, it is nowhere near as high as the Holocaust. And the holocaust was basically what created the concept of genocide.

That said, it is undeniable that Israel has shown a disregard for civilian life. But I think that is different from a genocide.
[automerge]1755526051[/automerge]
However I’m no scholar. While Gaza might not be comparable to the Holocaust, I suppose it could be comparable to the Bosnian genocide. And I do think this is a point scholars make. But I really haven’t studied the Bosnian genocide, so I can’t speak too much on this.
It took 6/7 years for Germany to perform the holocaust.
In the last 2, Israel managed to practically race to the ground the majority of living spaces and keeps killing civilians.
Also, jewish during the holocaust could not fight back like fisiologically the Gaza strip can, as they actually have some weapons.
 
Israel has a bit of international pressure. They’re trying to genocide and get away with it because they know they could be prosecuted later.

Also Nazis had a solution finale plan. And it’s not a championship about who kills more people. The minimum of people who have to be murdered have never been part of any definition.
 
I suppose my one point of contention with the genocide accusation is that if you look at the statistics, it genuinely does not look like Israel is trying to eradicate Gazans.

only 4-5% of Gazans had died in the war. Including Hamas fighters. Whereas the Holocaust killed over 60% of European Jews, with the percent going to 80-90% in some countries. Even if you say the death tolls are underestimates, it is nowhere near as high as the Holocaust. And the holocaust was basically what created the concept of genocide.

That said, it is undeniable that Israel has shown a disregard for civilian life. But I think that is different from a genocide.
[automerge]1755526051[/automerge]
However I’m no scholar. While Gaza might not be comparable to the Holocaust, I suppose it could be comparable to the Bosnian genocide. And I do think this is a point scholars make. But I really haven’t studied the Bosnian genocide, so I can’t speak too much on this.
Human lives are not a numbers game
 
And it’s not a championship about who kills more people. The minimum of people who have to be murdered have never been part of any definition.
Human lives are not a numbers game
numbers, no

but I think if you are alleging a genocide, percentages should be a significant factor

because if genocide is the eradication of a group, don’t know how else you can prove that without looking at the percentages
[automerge]1755532514[/automerge]
https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2024/10/22/rabcab-speak-truth/
Wish I could find it, but I saw a video of an Orthodox rabbi talking about how the pictures you see of Palestinians in Gaza look eerily similar to Jews who survived the Holocaust and how he feels sick about others using him and his faith to justify these atrocities…I understand the spirit of what you’re saying, but come on, this is undeniably genocide no matter who tries to downplay it.
not trying to downplay what’s happening, because what’s happening is undeniably awful

but I do think it’s healthy to have a bit of skepticism for Israel/palestine stuff in general, as both sides have a strong incentive to distort facts.
 
numbers, no

but I think if you are alleging a genocide, percentages should be a significant factor

because if genocide is the eradication of a group, don’t know how else you can prove that without looking at the percentages
[automerge]1755532514[/automerge]


not trying to downplay what’s happening, because what’s happening is undeniably awful

but I do think it’s healthy to have a bit of skepticism for Israel/palestine stuff in general, as both sides have a strong incentive to distort facts.
Except one side has no pull in international relationship, barely any money to fund propaganda and is literally prisoner in their own land.
Come the fuck on.
 
numbers, no

but I think if you are alleging a genocide, percentages should be a significant factor

because if genocide is the eradication of a group, don’t know how else you can prove that without looking at the percentages
[automerge]1755532514[/automerge]


not trying to downplay what’s happening, because what’s happening is undeniably awful

but I do think it’s healthy to have a bit of skepticism for Israel/palestine stuff in general, as both sides have a strong incentive to distort facts.
How are they (Palestinians) supposed to distort facts when they have virtually no political pull in their own country, let alone beyond its borders?
 
I know there's bad blood between them, but thete had to be a better way to resolve the issue. Unfortunately they don't share the same mindset, too caught up in the moments.
Defending ones Nation is absolutely fine, but there is "overkill". Atm the area should be vacated and no inhabitants allowed.




 
Israel has a bit of international pressure. They’re trying to genocide and get away with it because they know they could be prosecuted later.

Also Nazis had a solution finale plan. And it’s not a championship about who kills more people. The minimum of people who have to be murdered have never been part of any definition.
Nazi germany have their lebensraum goal
The same way Israeli Govt have their Greater Israel Project

To complete their project they will commit ethnic cleansing
 
Top