Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
And both support labor being enslaved to capitalists
Always has been

You know what's the most unfortunate thing - people fight each other.. argue each other based on right vs left.

While these political parties who spread the narrative for vote bank are two sides of the same coin. Something common across many democracies.

Both poltical parties project themselves on different footing but behind the scenes....they belong to the same category
In 1860s, it was the Republican north vs the Democratic south over slavery. What people dont know is that north simply opposed slavery itself, not racial inequality.

In the 1877-1960s, the Democratic Party passed Jim Crow law, with Republicans also voting for it.

In the 1960s, the Democratic Party passed the Civil Rights Act of 64, and Equal Voting Rights of 65. Republicans opposed this, and few democrats swapped sides. One of people who opposed these acts was future Republican president Ronald Reagan.

These dudes make everything so black n' white for agenda.

Van do you expect me to help you after allowing such a slander from this absolute clown??

I m so glad the electricity was out for me last night
Goddammit tac....
 
I hope he is not in hell, but I am happy he won't cause us potential catastrophes with his horrible work, and I am sad that he chose to live his life the way he did, but it was his choice

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859

"
Civil rights
At a December 2023 political conference hosted by his Turning Points USA group, Wired magazine reported that Kirk decried not only Martin Luther King Jr., calling the civil rights leader "awful" and "not a good person," but also the Civil Rights Act of 1965 that outlawed discrimination on the basis of race, colour, religion, sex and national origin, and prohibited segregation.

"I have a very, very radical view on this, but I can defend it, and I've thought about it," Kirk said. "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s."

Kirk argued the statute had brought about what he said was a "permanent" bureaucracy meant to promote diversity, equity and inclusion.

"
 
Solis posts guillotine memes frequently. C4N is saying Kirk is a fascist that brought this down on himself. Jew said similar things and also said he opened up a champagne bottle, and Toby didn't say shit, but we know that deep down he is finding all of this very amusing. These people have never fooled me. In Brazil, the same guys that preach love, democracy, and equality are the ones that started a terrorist campaign to overthrow democracy and turn Brazil into a giant Cuba back in the 60s.
I’m not like you, I don’t have to deflect and obfuscate in order to make my worldview mildly palatable. I was straight up with my thoughts since the very begining.

you can lie about me all you want but here is my view of this in case someone else is actually curious. No I don’t think bro deserved to die, no I don’t think this is a good thing for the country. Yes he was a disgusting human been who hated black people and lgbtq people. Yes that is a horrible way to die. Yes I think most of you are massive hypocrites that pick and choose what type of gun and political violence you care about. 50 mass shootings and a genocide in Gaza that’s probably killed over 100,000 children and you people couldn’t give two shits.

you need to actually start living your life and drop this obsession you have with people like me. It’s honestly super creepy.
Post automatically merged:

I do love insulting you, because all I see you do is whine and complain that anyone you don’t like is wrong; you’re a dipshit bully, and I’ll always be happy to call you out for it :sweat:
I don’t think he’s a bully, for the simple fact that he has zero wit or ability to hurt someone’s feelings,
 
I don’t think he’s a bully, for the simple fact that he has zero wit or ability to hurt someone’s feelings,
True, but bullies are usually humorless and insensitive as it is, so I think the description is accurate…by that same measure, Nameless is a vindictive little cunt himself, I’m sure whatever he said that warranted your response is just as heinous and inconsiderate as he thinks we’re being :suresure:
 
True, but bullies are usually humorless and insensitive as it is, so I think the description is accurate…by that same measure, Nameless is a vindictive little cunt himself, I’m sure whatever he said that warranted your response is just as heinous and inconsiderate as he thinks we’re being :suresure:
I low-key do feel bad for him. Bro is mega obsessed.
 
China is contrubuti to the destabilisation of the west btw
China is fanning the flames while they're chilling with popcorn on the other side of the river.
Both are imperialist cunt regimes btw
They already have Brazil by the balls for a while now.
I’m not like you, I don’t have to deflect and obfuscate in order to make my worldview mildly palatable. I was straight up with my thoughts since the very begining.

you can lie about me all you want but here is my view of this in case someone else is actually curious. No I don’t think bro deserved to die, no I don’t think this is a good thing for the country. Yes he was a disgusting human been who hated black people and lgbtq people. Yes that is a horrible way to die. Yes I think most of you are massive hypocrites that pick and choose what type of gun and political violence you care about. 50 mass shootings and a genocide in Gaza that’s probably killed over 100,000 children and you people couldn’t give two shits.

you need to actually start living your life and drop this obsession you have with people like me. It’s honestly super creepy.
Post automatically merged:


I don’t think he’s a bully, for the simple fact that he has zero wit or ability to hurt someone’s feelings,
Think of me what you want.
I agree. Let's stop calling people we dislike mentally ill.

However, like it or not, mental illness does exist.
Indeed. The scary thing is that some of those are getting normalized.
 

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
Always has been



In 1860s, it was the Republican north vs the Democratic south over slavery. What people dont know is that north simply opposed slavery itself, not racial inequality.

In the 1877-1960s, the Democratic Party passed Jim Crow law, with Republicans also voting for it.

In the 1960s, the Democratic Party passed the Civil Rights Act of 64, and Equal Voting Rights of 65. Republicans opposed this, and few democrats swapped sides. One of people who opposed these acts was future Republican president Ronald Reagan.

These dudes make everything so black n' white for agenda.



Goddammit tac....
True

When history or ideology is interpreted in black and white just to push an agenda, then common man stop thinking for themselves.

They get moved around emotionally, just like pawns or chess pieces on someone else’s board.

So yes oversimplified interpretation in form of black and white often turns people into pawns, used in the game of politics, instead of informed players who can see the whole board.
 
Top