He could if mods were actually respecting their own rules



Sharing discriminatory views or "discriminatory remarks" is part of "discrimination" as it targets any people of these communities on this forum.

The fact that it's untargeted doesn't make it right. And a lot of times it's targeted. There are reason why these rules exists, because without it,, the forum would be directly targeted by the laws the country this server is residing in.



I thought Van would understanding it more than you, that's all
Tbf that says "berating users specifically or making vague discriminatory comments to bait a reaction out of users"
I don't remember him attacking any users here for being homosexual or anything.
 

Jew D. Boy

I Can Go Lower
Best part is how he didn't need to say ANY of this at all. Just like he never had to imply that he's a nazi or "that he would be viewed as one" by people here.
Some people really need to keep their skeletons in the closet
If he wants to keep telling on himself, it’s fine with me! Anyone else who comes into this thread (other than the handful of chuds who agree with him) will look at his posts and immediately see what a miserable cretin he is, we don’t need to guide anyone towards that obvious conclusion :handsup:
 
I'm fine with that now, this forum is dying anyway
I don't think the forum is dying, per se, probably just the frequent breaks and the fact that people have been literally fight over the same 2-3 powerscaling topics for 15+ years now has gotten stale.

However, if you want to restore traffic to prime levels, make this thread public. Fuck it can't be half pregnant and hide it with iffy/inconsistent moderation. Either go all out and invite all the bigots, hardcore righties, hardcore lefties, etc... for an all out war with no modding, or just close it.
 
But not all people are heterosexual, so this argument is bogus
All humans are ordered towards heterosexual actions, not all humans have feelings that align with said actions. They are still ordered towards it

Much like how all humans are ordered towards having empathy to some degree, some humans are psychopaths but even psychopaths are ordered towards having empathy, even if it's physically more difficult for them because of some natural defect
[automerge]1759265652[/automerge]
If I were hidding jews in my basement during the Nazi occupation in France and if I told to the Gestapo that I was not hidding jews.. Trust me, it wouldn't be wrong to lie here
The ends never justify the means

You would be justified in concealing the truth or saying something misleading but technically correct, but lying in of itself is always immoral


He could if mods were actually respecting their own rules
Mods allow discussion.


The difference being that I do it based on works of scholars, he does it based on bullshit nonsensical thinking.
Teleological reasoning and natural law ethics >>>>>> materialist slop
 
All humans are ordered towards heterosexual actions, not all humans have feelings that align with said actions. They are still ordered towards it
This is just your subjective interpretation of reality.

If that makes you feel more secure with your own sexuality, that’s cool I guess. But it’s no more valid than an LGBT person’s views on sexuality.
 
you know I love banning but I don't have anything to work with here
I know, it's not that the content is the worst I've seen, back in the Bob and Tejas days I've seen worse. It's just the realization that some people are pretty much impossible to have a conversation with. You might as well load chatgpt with the most basic 2005 Bill O'Reilley talking points and have him chat with us lol
 
This is just your subjective interpretation of reality
No, that is biological. Unless you think someone having homosexual feelings somehow means their body is ordered towards expressing that feeling.

There are many examples of humans having disordered attractions (for example, to minors, or to siblings, or towards masochism)
[automerge]1759265796[/automerge]
Ultimately Monster and most other people here cannot get past the incest argument which nukes any argument people have towards homosexual marriage being legal
:kayneshrug:
 
There are many examples of humans having disordered attractions (for example, to minors, or to siblings, or towards masochism)
Disordered attractions are in the DSM because they cause disorder in a person’s life.

They cause an individual to commit sex crimes and if not, causes them intense suffering.

Consensual gay sex is harmless
 
Disordered attractions are in the DSM because they cause disorder in a person’s life.

They cause an individual to commit sex crimes and if not, causes them intense suffering.

Consensual gay sex is harmless
No, the disorder is within the thing itself. Function follows form, and the form of the human reproductive organs is towards...obviously reproductive actions which exclude homosexuality
[automerge]1759266194[/automerge]
that is exactly what it means

do you think that sexual desires are not connected to one’s biology?
They are, but ones biology can be defective in some way or other. Deviant attractions are always a defect
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
I'm fine with that now, this forum is dying anyway
Not really. It's a combination of multiple factors
-Summer is over and people are back in school
-flashback
-frequent breaks
-political chaos and focused on staying afloat
-older fans turning to other things while new fans are hard to come by due to OP's length

you know I love banning but I don't have anything to work with here
Not quite(probably). He's abusing plausible denialibility. He's blatantly insinuating certain things but avoids saying it outright. He says homosexuality is evil and that they shouldn't be allowed to get married, aka advocating for their rights to be taken away/them having rights is wrong. When directly asked should they lose their rights, he avoids answering. Bob got perma banned for saying women shouldn't have right to choose who they want to be with. H
 
Tbf that says "berating users specifically or making vague discriminatory comments to bait a reaction out of users"
I don't remember him attacking any users here for being homosexual or anything.
Trust me that when he says "homosexuality is unatural and a sin and bad" he is targetting every gay or lesbian users on this forum.

That's basic oppressive rethoric. You don't stop being oppressive just because you do not target someone specific, especially when you spread your rethoric on 3000 pages of a thread in a political forum.

This rethoric can have real life harmfull effect on people, that's what you guys do not understand

you know I love banning but I don't have anything to work with here
It's not a question of content, it's a question of understanding if a rethoric is harmfull or not.

Someone insulting me by calling me a motherfucker is LESS harmfull than someone saying "Trans women are not really women" in the wind without targetting anyone.



Not really. It's a combination of multiple factors
-Summer is over and people are back in school
-flashback
-frequent breaks
-political chaos and focused on staying afloat
-older fans turning to other things while new fans are hard to come by due to OP's length
Nop. It's because this place is not a safe place for the One Piece fanbase to strive. Simple as that.

>>>>


However, if you want to restore traffic to prime levels, make this thread public. Fuck it can't be half pregnant and hide it with iffy/inconsistent moderation. Either go all out and invite all the bigots, hardcore righties, hardcore lefties, etc... for an all out war with no modding, or just close it.
Or we just make this place more inclusive and we allow it to be a safe place for people to come without being insulted, without seeing hateful rethoric or without seeing their favorite story being trashed on 24/7

This forum is not dying for no reasons.

People do understand that if I fight, it's not to destroy this forum but to actually transform it in a real cool place for the fanbase.


The ends never justify the means

You would be justified in concealing the truth or saying something misleading but technically correct, but lying in of itself is always immoral
Wait, let me try to understand you.

Are you saying that it's not ok to lie to the gestapo if you say "I'm not hidding jews" when in fact you do are hidding jews from being deported and exterminated in the context of the occupation of France by Nazi ?


Mods allow discussion.
Mods allow oppression


Teleological reasoning and natural law ethics >>>>>> materialist slop
That's why you do not understand the world.
 
Top