Controversial "Imu using a sword to kill Luffy isn't Hawk Eye upscale"

[BillSlipton]

Yeah, but he is much less susceptible to virtually everything else to which Garp would likely be susceptible. Of course he's also completely vulnerable to seawater but that's not really a weapon, just an unsuitable environment.

Sea water can be a weapon in the right hands. Dont limit the imagination.

And none of those things make your original claim true. Luffy has no more of susceptibility to swords than garp does.

 

[Fn Lucci]

Sea water can be a weapon in the right hands. Dont limit the imagination.

"That's" = that is. I'm not talking hypothetically, I'm talking about what is actually in the series.

And none of those things make your original claim true. Luffy has no more of susceptibility to swords than garp does.

You're persisting with a misunderstanding of what I said. It seemed to drive some other posters mad but I think you still have the chance to read my posts more carefully. And not, uh... show me examples where Garp laughs it off to prove that he's just as vulnerable lol.

Spoiler

 

[Killerj]

Literally who

 

[BillSlipton]

"That's" = that is. I'm not talking hypothetically, I'm talking about what is actually in the series.


You're persisting with a misunderstanding of what I said. It seemed to drive some other posters mad but I think you still have the chance to read my posts more carefully. And not, uh... show me examples where Garp laughs it off to prove that he's just as vulnerable lol.

Spoiler

Garps pain tolerance doesnt negate his chest clearly being split open and damaged.

Sit down retardji san and explain your position one more time but very clearly.

Perhaps theres a misunderstanding.

 

[Fn Lucci]

theres a misunderstanding.

Yes, definitely.

Garp is technically not any more immune to swords, but that's not relevant.

Thanks

 

[BillSlipton]

Yes, definitely.

Thanks

Then make your point