Controversial "Imu using a sword to kill Luffy isn't Hawk Eye upscale"

Yeah, but he is much less susceptible to virtually everything else to which Garp would likely be susceptible. Of course he's also completely vulnerable to seawater but that's not really a weapon, just an unsuitable environment.
Sea water can be a weapon in the right hands. Dont limit the imagination.

And none of those things make your original claim true. Luffy has no more of susceptibility to swords than garp does.
 
Sea water can be a weapon in the right hands. Dont limit the imagination.
"That's" = that is. I'm not talking hypothetically, I'm talking about what is actually in the series.

And none of those things make your original claim true. Luffy has no more of susceptibility to swords than garp does.
You're persisting with a misunderstanding of what I said. It seemed to drive some other posters mad but I think you still have the chance to read my posts more carefully. And not, uh... show me examples where Garp laughs it off to prove that he's just as vulnerable lol.
 
"That's" = that is. I'm not talking hypothetically, I'm talking about what is actually in the series.


You're persisting with a misunderstanding of what I said. It seemed to drive some other posters mad but I think you still have the chance to read my posts more carefully. And not, uh... show me examples where Garp laughs it off to prove that he's just as vulnerable lol.
Garps pain tolerance doesnt negate his chest clearly being split open and damaged.

Sit down retardji san and explain your position one more time but very clearly.

Perhaps theres a misunderstanding.
 
:ihaha: So my followers are called "Erkanite".

1) Disciple of Erkan: Mihawk's title is World's Greatest Swordsman meaning he is the most skilled wielder of a blade, not the strongest. Anyone that uses a blade in combination with anything else like devil fruits (e.g. Law and Linlin), demonic shenanigans (Imu) or even just advanced Haki (e.g. Shanks, feckin somehow) don't count as swordsmen. Sword wielders and swordsmen aren't the same and Oda made a distinct difference if you autistically micro analyse words while ignoring context. All consistent followers of this train of logic will downplay Mihawk in general and will obviously consider Imu to be superior to him.
.
That's simply how Oda sees things, does it make sense? Perhaps not, perhaps does, but it's his manga so that's what he says. It shouldn't have been difficult to add this at least "master swordsman" title to Xebec, Roger, Shanks in their info boxes;



Master swordsman, Pirate hunter.




Oda could easily say; "master swordsman; great pirate Roger", Or "master swordsman; pirate captain Shanks." But he doesn't do that.

How Oda sees it;



Being a swordsman in One Piece: sticking to traditional swordsmanship forms and techniques only. Otherwise as Zolo said; they are "blood thirsty brutes".
 
How is he shit swordsmen?





Are you retarded?
First of all, I am in fact retarded. Thankfully, my status as a card carrying short bus rider does not inhibit me from being able to debate circles around you.

I do find myself in a rather difficult position attempting to refute this post, however, as I am struggling to even begin to understand the point you think you're trying to make. I tell you he's a devil fruit merchant and you decide to serve me up some prime examples on a silver platter? Peak examples of Elite Sword Technique: The "damn, I can't hit this guy... I better distract him with my homing bombs, and wither this entire forest so I can get a clear shot attack" and the "Turning On My Lightsaber stab".
 
Imu's sword attacks are below Mihawk's because of his title as the WSS, which is true both in name and in actuality.

That's the conclusion we should draw from this. Based on Imu's feats, we can see that he was able to take out either Luffy or Loki with sword attacks alone, which only upscales Mihawk even further.

As for Imu being a swordsman, I don't think he is. He's more like Daz Bones:

someone who uses a sword alongside other bladed weapons.




" Don't go calling me a swordsman.

As long as it's a weapon capable of slashing apart (bladed weapons) the human body...

that's enough. "
He uses both a sword and a spear.

So people can call him a swordsman because he uses a sword and other bladed weapons, just as they could call him a spearman because he uses a spear and other bladed weapons. He isn't exclusively defined by either weapon.

This is about Mihawk's title and whether Imu is a swordsman.

As for EoS Zoro, he isn't affected by that, since he defeated Daz Bones, who fought similarly to Imu, and has also defeated numerous swordsmen.

So EoS Zoro's strength isn't limited by Imu.
 
Last edited:
Top