Controversial "Imu using a sword to kill Luffy isn't Hawk Eye upscale"

[BillSlipton]

Yeah, but he is much less susceptible to virtually everything else to which Garp would likely be susceptible. Of course he's also completely vulnerable to seawater but that's not really a weapon, just an unsuitable environment.

Sea water can be a weapon in the right hands. Dont limit the imagination.

And none of those things make your original claim true. Luffy has no more of susceptibility to swords than garp does.

 

[Fn Lucci]

Sea water can be a weapon in the right hands. Dont limit the imagination.

"That's" = that is. I'm not talking hypothetically, I'm talking about what is actually in the series.

And none of those things make your original claim true. Luffy has no more of susceptibility to swords than garp does.

You're persisting with a misunderstanding of what I said. It seemed to drive some other posters mad but I think you still have the chance to read my posts more carefully. And not, uh... show me examples where Garp laughs it off to prove that he's just as vulnerable lol.

Spoiler

 

[Killerj]

Literally who

 

[BillSlipton]

"That's" = that is. I'm not talking hypothetically, I'm talking about what is actually in the series.


You're persisting with a misunderstanding of what I said. It seemed to drive some other posters mad but I think you still have the chance to read my posts more carefully. And not, uh... show me examples where Garp laughs it off to prove that he's just as vulnerable lol.

Spoiler

Garps pain tolerance doesnt negate his chest clearly being split open and damaged.

Sit down retardji san and explain your position one more time but very clearly.

Perhaps theres a misunderstanding.

 

[Fn Lucci]

theres a misunderstanding.

Yes, definitely.

Garp is technically not any more immune to swords, but that's not relevant.

Thanks

 

[BillSlipton]

Yes, definitely.

Thanks

Then make your point

 

[Erkan12]

Erkanite

So my followers are called "Erkanite".

1) Disciple of Erkan: Mihawk's title is World's Greatest Swordsman meaning he is the most skilled wielder of a blade, not the strongest. Anyone that uses a blade in combination with anything else like devil fruits (e.g. Law and Linlin), demonic shenanigans (Imu) or even just advanced Haki (e.g. Shanks, feckin somehow) don't count as swordsmen. Sword wielders and swordsmen aren't the same and Oda made a distinct difference if you autistically micro analyse words while ignoring context. All consistent followers of this train of logic will downplay Mihawk in general and will obviously consider Imu to be superior to him.
.

That's simply how Oda sees things, does it make sense? Perhaps not, perhaps does, but it's his manga so that's what he says. It shouldn't have been difficult to add this at least "master swordsman" title to Xebec, Roger, Shanks in their info boxes;

Master swordsman, Pirate hunter.

Oda could easily say; "master swordsman; great pirate Roger", Or "master swordsman; pirate captain Shanks." But he doesn't do that.

How Oda sees it;

Being a swordsman in One Piece: sticking to traditional swordsmanship forms and techniques only. Otherwise as Zolo said; they are "blood thirsty brutes".

 

[mly90]

Takanome remain the beating heart of this forum and his title continues to rattle all the haters