Who will be the next Strawhat


  • Total voters
    895
Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly Yamato capable of handling scenarios carrot would by comparison would feel very extremely underwhelming. The fight I would love to see is Yamato vs smoothie.
Now that's going to be a hell of a fight because we haven't seen what smoothie can do other than squeeze out liquid from stuff and absorb it too, grow from absorbing it, and a no-name attacks.
 
It's not what I'm doing. What I'm doing is not in the realm of the known knowledge. With my theory I actually expended the actual knowledge on some storytelling concept.

For example "foreshadowing" is very badly categorized and described concept. What I did with that article on my blog. Is cleared the knowledge on the subject and expended it more precisely to real storytelling pattern.

This is called theorizing. This is a field called "Narratology".

The same way, by explaining what a "subversion dialogue" was. I expended the knowledge on the subject and categorized a storyteling pattern that was not described - at least in my knowledge (and it's huge on the subject) - by theoricians and storytelling "gourous"(another words for specialists/analyser/script doctors. etc.)

The reason I can do this is because One Piece uses a lot of strong storytelling pattern in a very pedagogic way, parmitting me to understand easily some of those pattern.

This is not peer review, it goes beyond that as I'm the only one with that specific knowledge for now.
This LITERALLY has nothing to do with what I just said, you used a word word and instead of admitting it you used that to as a spring board to post your blog, that no one cares about
yeah.. I will ignore that.
Why because its correct? Don't tell people that they are using words wrong and then try to make yourself seem smart by doing the same thing
For you guys to listen to me.. yeah.. The real evidences are under way. You will soon understand why Carrot was always the best candidate.
This comes a cross as a bot answer
I tell you not to be a hypocrite with grammer and you respond with "Carrot has evidence"
.
.
.
I think I'm done here, a fake intellectual trying to use big words to claim he "analyzes" a story about fighting pirates as if its a codex that has hidden messages where every clue leads to a character who only purpose in the most important arc of the main character's journey has been relegated to the background of more important characters and being removed from any major plot sub plot or crew moments
Post automatically merged:

Carrot for nakama !!!
Even if al you want here is for her join, please atleast have a sensible conversation and not calling people stupid because they don't agree with you, I'd hate for another Carrot supporter to be labeled the way @CarrotForNakama has been in this thread
Post automatically merged:

I've actually had reasonable conversations with people who want and believe Carrot will join
They presented a reasonable logic while also admitting the short comings of Carrot as a candidate
And by doing so shows that they believe that the positives she has outweighs the negatives and despite the negatives that they put forward, she still has enough that makes them believe she'll join

Which in turn actually makes me look at her positives a bit deeper
.
.
.
Then I cone to this thread and see the arguments for her and all the belief I had in her candidacy goes right out the window :milaugh:
 
Last edited:
Nothing in this shows in both of the anime and manga, u are just making shit up again
Yes it was shown clearly. You just choosed to ignored it.

Carrot's naivety toward adventure and the sea is in the center of her character arc. You can spot that with different narrative data throughout her story, let look at those data:


- The first time she expresses how she viewed a mission heading toward a yonko territory :




> Wanda had to reprimand her




- The second time she was introduced. Thinking that she would just go on a pyjama party for 1 day with the strawhats bringing only one teeshirt and one snacks





> Pedro had to reprimand her



(note in those instance that Pedro and Wanda are using the same rethoric)

- The way she faces her ennemies (head on) but doesn't really think about it (much like Luffy in that instance)




- The way she interacts with the strawhat and Chopper, listening blindly to his orders even thou he doesn't know what to do (funny enough "Choniki" is the title of that chapter):




Again.. the way she attacks blindly her ennemy without even a notion of danger:




Interestingly enough, we can see that this "naivety" completely dissapears at the very moment where she is in perfect sync with her purpose and the memories of her master while letting the anger at the door:




But her naivety didn't disappeared and she keeps rushing toward the ennemy without a mear sence of danger (note here that Luffy and Carrot are both showed in a similar position, in a similar direction and in a similar panel .. heading toward their ennemy and they will both fail):



Finally Perospero is the onewho will "give the truth" to Carrot: "You are too naive, return home":



------------

Again. Naivety is the core of Carrot's characterization and it's in the center of her character arc. This naivety will be again tested in the future. Only this time, Carrot won't be defeated.

Because the thing is: Naivety is not a weakness. It's a gift.

---------------
Post automatically merged:

This LITERALLY has nothing to do with what I just said, you used a word word and instead of admitting it you used that to as a spring board to post your blog, that no one cares about
You will care. Trust me, you will ;)


I tell you not to be a hypocrite with grammer
There is no hypocrisy. Therefore I don't have to reply to this invective. Copy ?
 
There is no hypocrisy. Therefore I don't have to reply to this invective. Copy ?
Its not abuse or an insult
Its an observation

You told someone not to use words they didn't understand and the you yourself used a word you didn't understand

That is a hypocrite

I didn't really like people saying you played the victim when you were called out and even tried defending you in my DMs to get people to calm down but Jesus Christ, I get what they were saying

Have a good day
 
But where did it show that she want to be a Pirate?
That's the thing, she did not expressed that desire. That future was implied through Perospero "go back to the wood that's where ou belong" in other word "you don't belong on the sea, go back".. But that is stated by an ennemy humliating our character, it's therefore narratively bound to be proven FALSE. (because Oda don't indulge this kind of message in his story)

In other word: The story moving forward will prove that Carrot DO belong to the sea. Therefore proving that Perospero was wrong.

But this will come later. For now, this is not that time. For now.. Carrot will just need to find a reason to go back to the sea.
Post automatically merged:

You told someone not to use words they didn't understand and the you yourself used a word you didn't understand
The thing is. I do understand that words very much. I've worked with it and studied it for years. So I know my way around it.

Like I said, there is things that the fanbase don't know and this was a proof of that.
 
That's the thing, she did not expressed that desire. That future was implied through Perospero "go back to the wood that's where ou belong" in other word "you don't belong on the sea, go back".. But that is stated by an ennemy humliating our character, it's therefore narratively bound to be proven FALSE. (because Oda don't indulge this kind of message in his story)

In other word: The story moving forward will prove that Carrot DO belong to the sea. Therefore proving that Perospero was wrong.

But this will come later. For now, this is not that time. For now. Carrot will just need to find a reason to go back to the sea.
Are we reading the same story cause I have seen the fight and don't get “carrot will go back on the sea" vibes you only as a reader
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top