It's not what I'm doing. What I'm doing is not in the realm of the known knowledge. With my theory I actually expended the actual knowledge on some storytelling concept.
For example "foreshadowing" is very badly categorized and described concept. What I did with
that article on my blog. Is cleared the knowledge on the subject and expended it more precisely to real storytelling pattern.
This is called theorizing. This is a field called "Narratology".
The same way, by explaining what a "subversion dialogue" was. I expended the knowledge on the subject and categorized a storyteling pattern that was not described - at least in my knowledge (and it's huge on the subject) - by theoricians and storytelling "gourous"(another words for specialists/analyser/script doctors. etc.)
The reason I can do this is because One Piece uses a lot of strong storytelling pattern in a very pedagogic way, parmitting me to understand easily some of those pattern.
This is not peer review, it goes beyond that as I'm the only one with that specific knowledge for now.