Those seven rules are indeed broad. The whole point was to find the
CORE of what makes a good potential candidate for a recruitment for a storytelling standpoint (not a potential strawhat.. yet)
Trust me, it works, I've done the math on ALL the characters (yeah the very thousands), and with those seven rules, you can actually pinpoint 5 good candidates:
Momo/Tama/Yamato/Carrot/Marco.
None of the strawhats are breaking those rule. You can check.
Careful.. Nami, while she is technically with Arlong at the time, has expressed the need to quit/reconsider her position
The fact that Nami had a responsibility didn't negate the fact that this responsibility was coming to an end. She was therefore, a good candidate in theory. (the nuance is important)
A new recruit on the Sunny will become part of the strawhats, implying that they must first be free of responsibilities. In other words they must:
Be free
Or
Without a faction
Or
Have expressed the need to reevaluate their current position
Or
Have already left their current faction
And the fact that you are saying that to me shows that you still have a bit to learn about the way One Piece is constructed. Notes that I doesn't deny the presence of Sad Backstory/Dream, those will just be transformed into something else later on.. but you have to read to understand what it is ;)
Trust me, I don't make storytelling points lightly, even more so for this precise one. If you feel like something is off, it's more probable, that you are near a cognitive dissonance in front of the story.. either designed by you or by the fan.
Lmao.. you are talking like a villain from a bad tv show xD
"This is your life nowwwww!"
"Without it.. you will lose the will to fight"
"muhahahahaha"
(Yes I added the laughs, but it's all the same

)
Yes, Wano is not Carrot's story, never has been. I wouldn't say irrelevant, just a side character and we've gone through this before, you already know that Robin was just a secondary character before joining even if it was part of her story. so yeah.. Carrot was just like that, just a little bit more non visible..
This argument seems so important to you .. yet.. it has no bases in the storytelling scheme of the story. it won't deny Carrot's chances in anyway.
Don't worry, Carrot will have her mometn, it's just not now. :)
You are making shortcut much too easily just to make your head canon fit your agenda.. Sorry but..
No, it would not make sence. The story of Yamato is related to her characterization, you can't just switch the storylines has you wish lol
Same for this fan theory and Carrot.. and even then I don't even think Oda thought about it ^^ Even a genius can't have all the ideas.
It doesn't work that way lol.
For that to be a reality, you have needed Yamato to be present in the arc and be low like Carrot is now.
See.. That's when I start losing patience discuting with you and start wanting to call you birds names.. The fact that I'm making assumptions and hypothesis does
NOT negate the fact that those assumptions are based on actual content and facts. Only the REASONNING of those assumptions is debatable.. So.. if you want to debate.. DEBATE.. I'm more than okay with that, there is a lot to say about what I said as an hypothesis regarding Yamato.. But don't toss the whole argumentation just because the word "assumption" makes you puke.. that's just the sign of someone who is not here to debate but to be toxic.
Exactly
If I make hypothesis taht precisely because this is a possible answer einstein.. gosh darn it..
Yes I can.. that's the whole point of making hypothesis..

We are not in a court to debate evidences, we are (in that precise point) debating the character of Yamato which is STILL TO THE DAY a mystery even for me.
You can't ask me "why do you think Yamato was invented" and just toss out my hypothesis just because it doesn't fit your tiny narrative and agenda..
that's nonsence (yes i'm starting to be a bit salty here)
Right now, there is
NO factual answers to the question "why do you think Yamato was invented". So.. if you have a better hypothesis .. BE MY GUEST. But at least try something lol
yes and ?
Nah.. only because the hate for a carrot doesn't negate the influence the hype of a character can have. You can therefore hate Yamato and still be bias toward her. Don't worry I'm not blind.
That's not my strongest argument. But as you take only what fits your narrative, of course you will cut away the others. And no, the story is not showing the opposite, it's going perfectly my way for now :) You will have to give me some evidences to prove me otherwise ma boi.
Yup, because Yamato won't join. This is just what the story is telling me. I'm sorry that my lack of compromise hurt you that much. But that's just the way things are now.
Yet, it proves you other wise.
[automerge]1641925495[/automerge]
You are aware that the comparison between the hate that recieve monet and monet fan VS the hate the recieve Carrot /Carrot's fan is
meaningless.. right ?
Having our own perspective is a thing, being toxic is another. IT's all about the balance of power, the victim and the oppressor.
Read carefully to my post, I'm never triggered by toxicity. i'm only triggered when I need to re peat 100 time the same things. While I do denounce the toxicity toward Carrot and her fan I'm not doing the as a personnal fight, I do this :
- For my fellow carrot fan who feel litterally bullied and don't want to talk about Carrot anymore because of that
- For the story itself
[automerge]1641925594[/automerge]
"i'm being toxic but.. that's just me"