Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1040 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #admirals>yonko #franky's lasers>>kidd's canon #kanjuro drawings>law>kidd #kanjuro the linlin slayer #king>big mom #law is best supernova #linlin the one pump chump #linlin the weakest top tier #midd and low #perona is the best girl #perona top 1 #ulti is best girl #useless captain mid #yonko>admirals #zoro bodies your fave #zoro>>law big mom>fujitora king>katakuri>law>kidd zoro >> kidd
- Status
.
Did you read the line after that in the summary?
- We see a huge explosion in the hole. Narrator proclaims Law and Kid winners of the battle.
Again, you have failed to explain how this is a plot hole?
Literally, how is this at all a plot hole?
This makes perfect sense and was reasonably foreseeable after Law's attack last chapter.
Not showing the fight means the fight wasn't a major piece of focus, which is my point. The battle against an emperor of the sea should easily overshadow every other battle, but it had been sidelined for the most part.
Kidd and Law defeating Big Mum after their battle had recieved relatively little focus seemed strange considering Big Mum is one of the most important characters in the series.
Tying her defeat in with the bomb plot line is a very convincing way to defeat her as opposed to Law and Kidd just outright winning with their own attacks. This still gives Law and Kidd the victory, but still preserves Big Mum as a potential threat in the future if she shows up again, and also neatly resolves the bomb plot line.
- We see a huge explosion in the hole. Narrator proclaims Law and Kid winners of the battle.
Again, you have failed to explain how this is a plot hole?
Literally, how is this at all a plot hole?
This makes perfect sense and was reasonably foreseeable after Law's attack last chapter.
Not showing the fight means the fight wasn't a major piece of focus, which is my point. The battle against an emperor of the sea should easily overshadow every other battle, but it had been sidelined for the most part.
Kidd and Law defeating Big Mum after their battle had recieved relatively little focus seemed strange considering Big Mum is one of the most important characters in the series.
Tying her defeat in with the bomb plot line is a very convincing way to defeat her as opposed to Law and Kidd just outright winning with their own attacks. This still gives Law and Kidd the victory, but still preserves Big Mum as a potential threat in the future if she shows up again, and also neatly resolves the bomb plot line.
:cheers:
I am unable to Stop my laugh just thinking what kind of avys Panther has to wear...not for one day...two week....3 months...but for whole fuckin years😂😂😂😂
Law would be like.... I was better off with Luffy than kidd...dude landed two finisher and BM tanked it
I am unable to Stop my laugh just thinking what kind of avys Panther has to wear...not for one day...two week....3 months...but for whole fuckin years😂😂😂😂
Law would be like.... I was better off with Luffy than kidd...dude landed two finisher and BM tanked it
I think the real sin is how uncreative Oda was with this fight. You have three of the most fluid and inspiring fruits out there — magnetism, Opi Opi and a Soul Fruit — and it comes down to a slugfest, constant kroom stabbings (they did get cool) and banal scrapmetal structures. I'm convinced anyone in this thread with an hour time limit could've made a meal aesthetically pleasing fight out of these fruits.
Narratively this fight might've held as much or less weight than King v. Zoro but should've been much better to read.
Narratively this fight might've held as much or less weight than King v. Zoro but should've been much better to read.
In this short summary right now does it say she was KO'd? Yes or No
In the more detailed summary or images I could be wrong, but that is not what it says in the short summary and that is what we are going off of.
I explained the plot hole to you, you just refused to take in the explanation. What you think is a plot line is really a plothole literally too
Just because they dont show the fight doesnt mean they weren't fighting and obviously they're not going to spend months focusing on this fight alone when they have a shitload of other points to cover.
In the more detailed summary or images I could be wrong, but that is not what it says in the short summary and that is what we are going off of.
I explained the plot hole to you, you just refused to take in the explanation. What you think is a plot line is really a plothole literally too
Just because they dont show the fight doesnt mean they weren't fighting and obviously they're not going to spend months focusing on this fight alone when they have a shitload of other points to cover.
- Status