Again, no argument. Zoro's a pure Haki-based fighter while Luffy's a devil's fruit-centric fighter who also excels in Haki. The actual joke is thinking a complete Haki-centric fighter wouldn't be as good as a mixed fighter.
You have no actual proof for what you are saying and yes he was intrigued by it and clearly didn't know what it actually was. You can't just make your own opinion as facts...
The fact is Zoro does not know internal destruction, Oda made it clear Enma was sucking all of his Haki so Zoro just let it go (which is why he had a time limit just like G4 lol) and Luffy's Adv CoC made him able to go toe to toe against Shuron Hakke Kaido using Gear 2 and 3.
So no he does not have any better proficiency on any Haki than Luffy when he relies on a sword to uses one of its forms and does not know internal destruction.
Shanks is all hype but in reality he caught 2 L's. First pre Yami Yami Blackbeard scarred him and then he lost his arm to the smallest Sea King in One Piece
Not out of the blue, but I saw the retarded argument of "going all out".
When we have literally Luffy going G4 against fodders but staying in base against Kaido for a long time lmao.
Complete idiotic argument, easily debunked. But you'll say whatever crap about Katakuri so as to make King look better when that's impossible xDDD.
Shanks is all hype but in reality he caught 2 L's. First pre Yami Yami Blackbeard scarred him and then he lost his arm to the smallest Sea King in One PIece
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.