such as creation myths, what supernatural realms (bhavachakra holds more supernatural realms than abrahamic religions) there are, views about the universe,explanations of phenomena that people didnt understand when the religion was created (such as lightning or earthquakes), etc etc etc.
Would you describe Catholicism and Orthodoxy as monotheistic? The presence of saint worship doesn't differ from polytheistic worship. The only difference is that the word god is not used for the saints but they effectively occupy the same roles as pre Christian gods. The same development can be observed in mire recently converted overseas Catholic communities.
yes i would, because "saint worship" doesnt really apply. catholics all the time tell other people that they dont worship the saints or mary in the same sense as they do with god. this is a problem of terminology, but they are monotheists.
christians as a whole, because of the trinity, arent considered as monotheists by most adherents of islam though.
me thinking its more relevant to talk about major religions because the sheer number of their adherents is not willful ignorance about other religions.
if other religions make positive claims about the world and beyond, they can be compared just the same. and i doubt you will find multiple religions where there arent conflicting claims about the world and beyond. so they are still mutually exclusive, unless you want to reduce religions to their rough and vague outlines.
We need to conceive nothing as the absolute absense of being. The absense of being implies the non existence of any possibility. The absolute absense of possibilities imply logically to the concept of impossibility. Nothing has no possibility, then it's logically impossible.
We need to conceive nothing as the absolute ausence of being. The ausence of being implies the non existence of any possibility. The absolute ausence of possibilities imply logically to the concept of impossibility. Nothing has no possibility, then it's logically impossible.
This is a self-defeating argument though when we take it to its zenith. What do you mean by evidence? And what constitutes that your standards for evidence are sound to begin with?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.