Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry I'm not aware of mechanics..but I suppose there should b max 2 scum in 10 council member.
Do we have such rule or there is no mention of ratio
 
What? Did my whole point go over your head?
That town controls the council is already my default assumption, I don't need that verified, if we're all being heavily duped and this thing proves otherwise, that's good as well.

But this is all besides the point, as what my proposition entails is that we lynch her first and foremost, which probably shouldn't go through, unless she's lying completely (in which case, no need for the council thing)

The only opportunity cost is Xlaw, and it isn't really, because he can be dealt with in other ways
 

Ratchet

The End and the Beginning
β€Ž
That town controls the council is already my default assumption, I don't need that verified, if we're all being heavily duped and this thing proves otherwise, that's good as well.

But this is all besides the point, as what my proposition entails is that we lynch her first and foremost, which probably shouldn't go through, unless she's lying completely (in which case, no need for the council thing)

The only opportunity cost is Xlaw, and it isn't really, because he can be dealt with in other ways
I'm asking you to explain your previous post, in case you didn't quite catch on. I don't need to provide numbers - it's simple. Scum can pool votes easier than Town can. So scum being on the council is... pretty standard to me.

Again, the main purpose of any of these lynches is not information. The Council lynch Nana is a compromise, not the point of it.

Is there a reason you don't want the Xlaw/Zemmi thing resolved here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top