@NeutralWatcher and others.
The above para is for Lanji, he called me inconsistent bt didn't try to find(or couldn't find) if i was using the same logic against Don that i agreed with on Rayan or not. I didn't, the next posts in which i call Don out are based on different reasons.
Second Para is why kept my vote on Don, the day wasn't ending, i can take my time to decide if i should immediately unvote or not, or should wait a while to see more reactions. Bt thn he claimed He protected Relapse when he usually protects major player like Reborn, and we have many good ones in this game.
[automerge]1590805343[/automerge]
Shouldn't you have waited n let me explain again thn?
[automerge]1590805574[/automerge]
And What exactly make me sus, and executioner lol? Did you try to go back n read posts? No i dont think so. I was sussing everyone, first tac, thn Nat and i called out Don because i felt he became cautious after i called him out.
Don was bugging Celestia to role claim if she was invest or not, when she wanted to get reactns out of Cinera and i called him out on that. And when he became inactive after that i tried lynching him, it's not my mistake he gave such suspicious reactn to that.
I first sussed Tac thn towncleared him, then Nat her reactn also felt genuine to me and then went with Don. I go in the game while assuming everyone is sus.
[automerge]1590806038[/automerge]
I am not investigative role, you didn't even read why i lynched him.

[automerge]1590806839[/automerge]
I didn't say there can't be dupes Tac bt was against establishing dupes exists when we haven't even faced role claim clash amongst users. It would benefit scums to fakeclaim if it's already established there are Dupes and so they can easily role claim.
I mentioned that it's better to do this after we face Role claim clashes and read those players to judge em townie or not. And also that possible scum might have also tried supporting dupe existence.