This is not a thread about whether or not ZKK will happen, rather I want to address what I believe to be a major dishonesty in regards to the people who propagate ZKK. I think that ever since ZKK was created, there was a serious amount of gaslighting and bad faith arguments surrounding the theory. Apart from a few people who will openly admit that they believe Luffy's victory is fake, most ZKKers hold the paradoxical belief that Luffy will defeat kaido, that kaido will somehow re-awaken, and that zoro will be the one to kill him.
And I think most non-ZKK supporters can see exactly how BS this is. If Luffy didn't put kaido down for good, then his victory isn't real and he didn't defeat kaido. It doesn't matter what the narration box says or how Oda frames it, if Kaido needs to be killed by zoro, then Luffy is essentially in the same position katakuri was in at the end of WCI. At the end of Luffy vs kata, Luffy fell first but the fight was Luffy's victory because he was the last man standing.
How can Luffy simultaneously defeat kaido and zoro kill him at the same time? If Luffy is unable to fight kaido and zoro needs to intervene then by Oda's own portrayal in WCI, it is no victory.
Furthermore, if Kaido gets up in the next two chapters, Luffy's victory would be the exact same as kaido's victory in 1042. Was Kaido's victory then legitimate?
Was Oden's "victory" legitimate when he temporarily knocked kaido unconscious?
Did Lucci defeat Luffy when Luffy was lying on the floor after roku-o-gun?
Either Luffy defeats kaido or zoro does, there is no both.
This brings me to the main point of this thread. Deep down, every ZKK supporter really supports the idea that Luffy fails to defeat kaido and that zoro does it in his place. However because this idea is so radical and nonsensical, they essentially need to gaslight the fanbase into believing that this isn't exactly what the ZKK theory argues.
Since a lot of ZKKers are willing to go down with their theory, I'm inviting you to just tell the truth. Admit it. Admit that you don't want Luffy to defeat kaido.
And I think most non-ZKK supporters can see exactly how BS this is. If Luffy didn't put kaido down for good, then his victory isn't real and he didn't defeat kaido. It doesn't matter what the narration box says or how Oda frames it, if Kaido needs to be killed by zoro, then Luffy is essentially in the same position katakuri was in at the end of WCI. At the end of Luffy vs kata, Luffy fell first but the fight was Luffy's victory because he was the last man standing.
How can Luffy simultaneously defeat kaido and zoro kill him at the same time? If Luffy is unable to fight kaido and zoro needs to intervene then by Oda's own portrayal in WCI, it is no victory.
Furthermore, if Kaido gets up in the next two chapters, Luffy's victory would be the exact same as kaido's victory in 1042. Was Kaido's victory then legitimate?
Was Oden's "victory" legitimate when he temporarily knocked kaido unconscious?
Did Lucci defeat Luffy when Luffy was lying on the floor after roku-o-gun?
Either Luffy defeats kaido or zoro does, there is no both.
This brings me to the main point of this thread. Deep down, every ZKK supporter really supports the idea that Luffy fails to defeat kaido and that zoro does it in his place. However because this idea is so radical and nonsensical, they essentially need to gaslight the fanbase into believing that this isn't exactly what the ZKK theory argues.
Since a lot of ZKKers are willing to go down with their theory, I'm inviting you to just tell the truth. Admit it. Admit that you don't want Luffy to defeat kaido.