No, that's not what I meant. I want you to prove me the fact of King being significantly stronger than Queen just like Katakuri and Smoothie. Stop dodging the question.
But it did not happen. Does not matter, Katakuri humiliated Luffy way harder than Cracker. Better hardening, better DF, awakening and FS.
That's fan-fucking-tastic. How do you know that if I may ask, now he is even going to die against the BBPs, interesting lol.
Yep, let's see.
I don't think so.
Base Marco kicking the ship away > Full Zoan King achieving the same feat. No matter whether Big Mom was here or not, she usually gets clowned a lot, even by Robin and Jinbe. Nice tryyyyyy. Named or nameless attacks are irrelevant lel. No, they are not lies.
What if he doesn't die even if King uses a sword? Plot armor is a significant part in fiction, moot point, you have to try harder.
Sure, that's why Luffy sent Cracker's ass across the island. Silly me.
King may beat potato Katakuri - you know the swordsman Katakuri? - but true Katakuri is clearly stronger than him. "Once slice ends Katakuri", so it's an imaginable feat, gotcha! How does he slice Katakuri if I may ask?
You end up wrong while I end up right, that's how rational my decisions are, yes!
Of course I need evidence. How else are you supposed to bring facts in the battledome outside of your own headcanon? Everyone can claim whatever they like, at the end it only matters if there are evidence backing up your claim, otherwise I can claim Bon Clay > Zoro as well. Git gud.
As I said, there's nothing to learn about since there are several factors to static bounties as well such as the threat level for the WG. Queen is a commander who can infect whole cities with viruses and plagues meanwhile Katakuri defends his home. Until then, you will stay confused.
For which rules? As I said, there are several factors in bounties and we have the confirmation how sadistic and brutal Queen truly is, especially in terms of danger. Your Chinjao argument is nonsense, whether he is a "one trick pony" or not doesn't matter. He was a leader of a kingdom who challenged Prime Garp several times, he split an island with his signature move as well. No, he doesn't need to prove he is above Queen, he already is significantly above Queen. Portrayal and feats are in favor of Katakuri. The difference of their bounties does not matter. Lol, Queen apparently is stronger because he has a one-shot attack while you clearly miss the fact that, if Katakuri uses his Mogura, he can easily blow someone's head away which would be a one shot attack as well. To be honest, Queen IS impressive and his portrayal clearly shits on King, especially in terms of versatility. Katakuri > Queen > King/Potato Katakuri?
I call it salt, yes. Stay butthurt.
I'm afraid King may not even outclass the importance and portrayal of a weaker Calamity if he still sucks ass in terms of performance.
I still call it salt. Yes, Cracker's defense is versatile and good. Ask Ndule Senpai what he thinks about King and Cracker.
That’s rich coming from you. You argue with King's imaginable swordsmanship and you think I am arguing with headcanons, lol. KKG is Luffy's strongest attack, even stronger than Tank Man's Cannon Ball whose force was powerful enough to destroy several biscuit soldiers at once with Cracker's own body. Imagine KKG hitting the biscuit soldiers. This attack destroyed ALL God Threads from Doflamingo. His Off White blocked a Double Culverin. Do the math.
Of course it would, already explained above. Lmao, don't be that desperate. At least compare Katakuri's durability with Cracker's without considering the biscuit soldier's durability. They are not part of Cracker's own body meanwhile Katakuri's mochi can restrain Bound Man with ease.
Sure he would, absolutely, yep. Go ahead and spread your faxx ma boi!
His captain's teeth was cracked, Page One's skull gets easily fractured and thus he gets koed. Quite confused, aren't you? An EG couldn't do shit to Cracker's biscuit soldier meanwhile a Kong Gun broke its shields, do the math, again. Comparing Kong Guns with Sanji's mosquito AP, that's your next mistake.
I agree, I'm several leagues above you. In fact, you are not even in a league. You are just a 5 yo boi casually playing soccer, that's how big our difference is.

And which prediction came out true? Queen vs Franky? I'm looking forward it!
The one purely argues with headcanon - and thus said individual is no different to actual flatearthers - meanwhile another one purely argues with current data and facts. That's the level between us, I agree.
So he was Fujitora level since the TS? Because that's what you are implying. Hence it ain't the reality.
Depending on his performance, whether he keeps showing bad impressions each week in front of Marco, I may not even change by stance regarding his powerlevel. It doesn't even change for you even after both King and Queen looked helpless against Marco. Imagine showing that pathetic performance in front of another first mate in which you cannot even deal jackshit with ANOTHER calamity. Once again, baseless. We haven't seen everything from Marco's BDSM bitch and with his 0 feats, he won't achieve jackshit. I'd recommend you to start debating on realistic levels instead of your irrelevant blabla, okay? Irrelevant, didn't help him much when Marco choked him, the only difference is, if Marco chokes him, he may survive, if Katakuri buries him with tons of mochi to suffocate him, he will die. How does it matter whether the MC is calm or not? Marco's BDSM slave cannot slice Katakuri up regardless because of his FS and shapeshifting. That's simple. The factual 3 steps FS helped me to see through your bullshit, yes.

I'd like to but wouldn't it boring to debate with rational fellas? Debating with the delluded lik87 is much funnier because I have something to laugh about.

Bold part, holy crap, you seriously didn't write this shit, did you? Oh shit, debating against garbage long term headcanon sure won't look good for me, dude seriously wrote that lmfao. If King shows feats and portrayal comparable to Katakuri, I will take everything back. That ain't a problem for me. But let me guess, YOUR ego wouldn't allow you this kind of self-reflection?