Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1013 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter Gol D. Roger
- Start date
- Tags #perona is the best girl #perona top 1 #perona>ulti #ulti is best girl #woro #yamato4nakama #zoro bodies your fave #zoro is unparalleled in all existence #zoro one shots your fave #zoro too strong #zoro>>kidd bao huang>king kaido > mihawk luffy 20 minutes zoro 5 seconds luffyout sanjikillkaido vengeance for ulti and pay pay wanjiszn yonkos > admirals zoloout
- Status
The quote was I wank Zoro, not I have an agenda to wank Zoro. and specifically mentioned that the evidence in the panels go with my point on our current discussion where i have showed objective points and made my own subjective implications. Difference between you and I is I can swallow my pride and admit when I wank things and have headcanon, because it's an OP forum, there's not outside consequences of being wrong.
You have been subjective the entirety of our time in this discussion. Just admit you are both subjective and objective and we can move forward with our diaglogue in this convo.
You have been subjective the entirety of our time in this discussion. Just admit you are both subjective and objective and we can move forward with our diaglogue in this convo.
You can't reason with fanatics. You have Luffy and Sanji fanatics all acting up as well. They all believe no one outside of these trio is allowed to grow after each passing arc. You say one thing that is stated in the Manga that doesn't go along with their narrative, they all go on a mad one like I wrote the bloody Manga like why tf are you tryna beef me lool
You know what? I agree with you. You've brought me round.
I went back to reread the rooftop fight. Everytime Law used Shambles, there was an SFX, either pop or fwip. You are absolutely correct. But when Luffy appeared and saved Viola, there was no pop. Therefore, Law did not use Chambres and he just had his hands out for fun. Oh wait? Wrong rooftop. But it's fine, after all, it's the same logic as you used for this one, right? So we have no idea how Luffy saved Viola.
I went back to reread the rooftop fight. Everytime Law used Shambles, there was an SFX, either pop or fwip. You are absolutely correct. But when Luffy appeared and saved Viola, there was no pop. Therefore, Law did not use Chambres and he just had his hands out for fun. Oh wait? Wrong rooftop. But it's fine, after all, it's the same logic as you used for this one, right? So we have no idea how Luffy saved Viola.
Tatsumaki Zoro got a shallow cut in….then ran from an even powerful version of Kaido’s tatsumaki then said “It’s like fighting a natural disaster” implying he couldn’t do much
Asura. Kaido tanked the attack and didn’t even fall down or scream in excruciating pain when recieving the scar like he did when Oden gave him one. Zolo even went on record to say “This is the best I could do” “I was at least hoping to knock you down” then proceeds to get 1 shot by thunder bagua while his captain puts Kaido down in 2 simple hits.
Blast breath….really? This is seriously your argument right now??? Brook can freeze it, Sanji’s raidsuit is immune to it, Raizo can deflect it, shit even Kin’emon can cut it….that’s a very weak argument on your part sir
What’s more impressive? Cutting the blast breath or tanking it with 0% damage like Luffy?
Asura. Kaido tanked the attack and didn’t even fall down or scream in excruciating pain when recieving the scar like he did when Oden gave him one. Zolo even went on record to say “This is the best I could do” “I was at least hoping to knock you down” then proceeds to get 1 shot by thunder bagua while his captain puts Kaido down in 2 simple hits.
Blast breath….really? This is seriously your argument right now??? Brook can freeze it, Sanji’s raidsuit is immune to it, Raizo can deflect it, shit even Kin’emon can cut it….that’s a very weak argument on your part sir
What’s more impressive? Cutting the blast breath or tanking it with 0% damage like Luffy?
"I am stunned at the circularity of your argument" would be the correct way to write it, all the other words are extra and unnecessary.
Ill fix it for You: Law didnt use Shambles without Pop. That is because if Law used shambles there is a pop. There is no pop therefore Law did not use Shambles in that instant.
How can I literally be blind?
Are you that dense would have been a better suited insult for the occasion
Also sidenote direct at Mods: Mods if you want me to stop the bickering as well please let me know on here or message me and I will do so. I personally would like to continue the discussion as the other users are using terrible insults on me and I pity them.
[automerge]1620864637[/automerge]
Ill fill out the rest... And Subjective as well
Every user on this forum is subjective to an extent
Ill fix it for You: Law didnt use Shambles without Pop. That is because if Law used shambles there is a pop. There is no pop therefore Law did not use Shambles in that instant.
How can I literally be blind?
Are you that dense would have been a better suited insult for the occasion
Also sidenote direct at Mods: Mods if you want me to stop the bickering as well please let me know on here or message me and I will do so. I personally would like to continue the discussion as the other users are using terrible insults on me and I pity them.
[automerge]1620864637[/automerge]
Ill fill out the rest... And Subjective as well
Every user on this forum is subjective to an extent
A circular argument is one where the premise is the conclusion. Your fixed version isn't any less circular.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion
Circular reasoning is often of the form: "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true."
Let A = Law didn't use Shambles without Pop.
Let B = That is because if Law used shambles there is a pop
Honestly. This is textbook.
- Status