Who will be the next Strawhat


  • Total voters
    895
Status
Not open for further replies.
Today episode reminds me that yamato is still a stranger to SHs
:pepecafe:
Im expecting jinbe and new recruit celebration toast. But seems like no one knows yamato yet. If the situation doesnt change, idk how the crew will think yamato as a nakama

I was expecting she would help nami group or met sanji at some points. didnt happen
:pepecafe:
 
AB Brook
CD Chopper
EF Franky
GH Hancock
IJ Jinbei
KL Luffy
MN Nami
OP Oden (Yamato)
QR Robin
ST Sanji
UV Ussop
WX Water Law
YZ Zoro

I can't think of any other way for this classic to work unless we're getting more Nakama that haven't been introduced yet.
id love Hancock to join, and the next arc to be about her, depending on what happened to Amazon Lilly. Jinbe, her and Law were all there to save Luffy during and after Marineford, so they are significant characters to him. it could also be a way for Oda to break the MFMM pattern and have a even number of both female and male nakama next to Luffy (4 and 8), as @JoSeungHun7335 suggested. just dont know how to draw parallels with Sanji and Brook as shed likely be the last recruit, assuming Yamato (parallels with Nami and Robin) and Law (parallels with Usopp and Franky) are for now...
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why people think Law joining the crew would tarnish his character. He wants to know the meaning of the will of D, and that requires him to reach laugh tale. After Wano, he has 3 options of how to do this.

Option 1, go back into Big Mom's territory by himself to get her poneglyph, find the last one before Luffy, then kidnap Robin, turning Luffy into an enemy.

Option 2, ask for charity and humiliate himself by riding another pirate's coattails all the way to Laugh Tale all while pretending they're still rivals. And it's a big if if Luffy will let him mooch off the strawhats for something that significant anyway.

Option 3, understand when he has lost and instead of asking for charity, become a top member of the Pirate King's crew.

I really don't see how any of these are acceptable except for number 3.
Yep rereading wano chapters. When law talked to robin about the will of D, it seemed like it was a new found goal for him. He even had a flashback of Cora san. And to be able to know that, he has to stick around the shs.

And in one sequence, kidd thought Law was already an Sh henchman, ofc law would try to disagree due to his character but he would obey luffy and zoro anyways
Post automatically merged:

Today episode reminds me that yamato is still a stranger to SHs
:pepecafe:
Im expecting jinbe and new recruit celebration toast. But seems like no one knows yamato yet. If the situation doesnt change, idk how the crew will think yamato as a nakama

I was expecting she would help nami group or met sanji at some points. didnt happen
:pepecafe:
In contrary, i imagined comments from chopper or usopp saying having sone of a yonko in their crew would be reassuring, same comments they had when jinbe joined having a former schici would be reassuring.

Other than that, if its luffy's decision the crew was always welcoming. When robin joined everyone disagreed, but they took her anyways, so why would they disagree if yamato would become vital in their victory in this war?
 
I don't understand why people think Law joining the crew would tarnish his character. He wants to know the meaning of the will of D, and that requires him to reach laugh tale. After Wano, he has 3 options of how to do this.

Option 1, go back into Big Mom's territory by himself to get her poneglyph, find the last one before Luffy, then kidnap Robin, turning Luffy into an enemy.

Option 2, ask for charity and humiliate himself by riding another pirate's coattails all the way to Laugh Tale all while pretending they're still rivals. And it's a big if if Luffy will let him mooch off the strawhats for something that significant anyway.

Option 3, understand when he has lost and instead of asking for charity, become a top member of the Pirate King's crew.

I really don't see how any of these are acceptable except for number 3.
The biggest problem is you’re taking away choppers role.

Chopper and law in essence serve the same role on a ship. You can say ones a surgeon and ones a medic but at the end of the day One Piece is for young boys who don’t really care the difference between doctors.

Laws character has been defined by family. I honestly can’t see him abandoning his chosen family. He was willing to die for them earlier this very arc.
 
Laws character has been defined by family. I honestly can’t see him abandoning his chosen family. He was willing to die for them earlier this very arc.
No it hasn't. His character is defined by fate. Even when Corazon was dying fate was emphasized in his last words. Law's crew is irrelevant, they're barely given any focus and Law is often seen alone.

Also Law has shown he's willing to die with Luffy and risk his life to save Zoro. He's a good guy, good people don't let others die

edit: also jinbe refused to let his former crew die. What Law did is not indicative of a character defied by "family" the theme of family never came up with Law in canon
 
Last edited:
Today episode reminds me that yamato is still a stranger to SHs
:pepecafe:
Im expecting jinbe and new recruit celebration toast. But seems like no one knows yamato yet. If the situation doesnt change, idk how the crew will think yamato as a nakama

I was expecting she would help nami group or met sanji at some points. didnt happen
:pepecafe:
Yep. Actually meeting most of the straw hats is an extremely low bar yet somehow Yamao hasn't passed it.

People love to talk about how Luffy's all that matters when it comes to joining the crew, which is both right and wrong. Technically, as the captain ultimately the final decision is Luffy's. But straw hats aren't just a collection of individuals. They're treated like a family. When a new member joins, they not just getting hired by Luffy to do a job. They're a friend to the group that they want to officially bring into their family and that's what the toasts are there to celebrate.

You'll notice that Oda always makes sure to have the future nakama interact with the whole crew at some point. Outside of Luffy, they generally develop a notable relationship with a couple of them in particular, but they're always familiar to the group as a whole. Oda's had plenty of time to do the same for Yamao, yet instead of developing her with straw hats, all the time was spent on her relationship with Shinobu and Momo.

After she split up from protecting them and ran to the top to fight Kaido, she literally had to run past each and every different floor which all the straw hats were on. Oda didn't bother have her interact with a single one. Previously, the only straw hat she met for about 5 seconds was Franky, and that seems far more for the sake of setting up his fight against Sasaki than anything.

Forget nakama...heck, forget friend too. As of now Yamao is a total stranger to the crew.
 
Its funny how you use the case of misdirection to discredit Yamato to favour Carrot, when its actually the reverse.

You talk about Yamato appearing out of nowhere asking to join is the Red Herring, but you don't talk about the Red Herring that has existed for the longest time, and that's Carrot.

Carrot has been the 'potential straw hat' for the longest time, yet she has had little to no developments necessary for a Straw Hat in the timespan and arcs she's been with them. No in-depth flashback and backstory, no real conversation or bonding with Luffy (biting Luffy's ears and crying in his arms don't count), and most importantly of all, Carrot has never had a arc where she was the main character, despite how many arcs she's been in.

Every Straw hat who joined had a arc dedicated to them where they were the main character and where their struggles were resolved by Luffy, Luffy defeated the arcs main villain who they couldn't defeat themselves. Carrot has none of this going for her, but Yamato has-Yamato's biggest obstacle of leaving Wano and adventuring the world is Kaido, the same Kaido that is the main villain that Luffy wants to take down the most.

Breaking a potential Straw Hat candidate from the villain's captive hold and giving them freedom (Nami, Robin, Brook, Zoro etc) or the burden of responsibility that chains and binds them (Jinbe, Sanji, Franky, Chopper, Ussop) is how the bond between a potential Straw Hat and Luffy is created and sealed in stone. It all resolves around the theme of Luffy giving them freedom, either freedom from their captors, or freedom to pursue their dreams and ambitions. In return, the straw hats join Luffy's crew as gratitude for Luffy's help for either breaking them out from their captivity, or their inability to pursue their dreams.

All Straw Hats who joined felled in either one of the two categories. Yamato fits into the Breaking a potential Straw Hat candidate from the villain's captive hold and giving them freedom Category along with Nami, Robin, Brook and Zoro. Carrot fits in neither.

Carrot neither has a villian that is holding her captive, nor a burden that is holding her back from pursuing her dreams (she freely snuck onto the Sunny so easily). So you can see that Carrot just doesn't have the necessary circumstance or backstory to make her bonding with Luffy a compelling one, biting his ears and crying for Pedro don't count.

Yamato's sudden introduction doesn't make her a Red Herring, it actually makes Carrot the Red Herring. If Yamato was the Red Herring, who is she the Red Herring for?? Carrot is actually the Red Herring for Yamato.

Its like the callback to Vivi and Robin, Vivi joined the Straw Hats adventures so easily, yet she still couldn't join the crew for real at the end of Alabasta, Robin meanwhile did. And just Like Yamato, both Robin and Nami were subordinates to Luffy's previous enemies Arlong and Crocodile, just like Yamato is the child of Kaido. Carrot doesn't fit this pattern.

Adding Carrot to the story while also her snucking on the ship, is Oda's intentional doing to serve 2 purposes, and none of them have to do with Carrot joining the crew:

1. Carrot is used as the Red Herring, or bait and misdirection so to speak for the totally unexpected introduction of the real Straw Hat Yamato in the Wano Arc.

2. Carrot is introduced and made to go along with Luffy and half the Straw Hats to WCI as the eye witness to live to tell the tales of the Straw Hats long into the future, in this sense Carrot mirrors the roles that both Inuarashi and Nekomamushi played in sailing with the Pirate King Gol D Roger as Oden's retainers. Neither two went to Laugh Tale, and i don't think Carrot will either.

It's also ironic how you have to resort to manga panels that are misleading to what you are talking about, that's your intentional misdirection. Brook's real focus panel isn't when he first met Luffy, Nami and Sanji. Its when Brook asks Luffy if he can join the crew when Luffy's was lying on the piano that Brook played Bink's Sake at the party after defeating Moria in Chapter 489. It was set up as a 1 one 1 conversation, a conversation that Yamato and Luffy also had together and alone in the attic of Kaido's castle in chapter 984.





Now speaking of which, where is Carrot's one on one talk with Luffy about her wanting to join the crew? All right, she doesn't have one.
Wow, never thought of this but agree
 
No it hasn't. His character is defined by fate. Even when Corazon was dying fate was emphasized in his last words. Law's crew is irrelevant, they're barely given any focus and Law is often seen alone.

Also Law has shown he's willing to die with Luffy and risk his life to save Zoro. He's a good guy, good people don't let others die

edit: also jinbe refused to let his former crew die. What Law did is not indicative of a character defied by "family" the theme of family never came up with Law in canon
Are you serious. Laws a direct parallel to doffy.

Doffy mentions it himself how Law is similar to him. Doffy also shares the family theme with Law. Law doesnt fight Doffy for fate, he does it because Doffy killed someone he saw as his older brother. Law didn’t become a pirate because of fate, he did it because he saw his family killed by the white plague.

Luffy has stronger themes of fate than law does
 
In contrary, i imagined comments from chopper or usopp saying having sone of a yonko in their crew would be reassuring, same comments they had when jinbe joined having a former schici would be reassuring.

Other than that, if its luffy's decision the crew was always welcoming. When robin joined everyone disagreed, but they took her anyways, so why would they disagree if yamato would become vital in their victory in this war?
Comparing to jinbe back at FMI arc, he fight alongside SHs in an open space. Before the fight some SHs already knows jinbe and his story. Different from yamato who is unknown and stuck on rooftop at the moment

Sure it's always on luffy's call on who is joining. But what I really mean from my early post is, if the crew does not feel nakama vibe on yamato, then there would be no celebration toast for her. Like when robin sudden joining. No toast

I mean jinbe is the most awaited recruit for SHs. He deserve a celebration. Yamato? No one knows her yet. If she does not show up in front of the crew now, it would be awkward later like
"let's celebrate our new nakama, jinbe and yama-o"
"who is yama-o?"

Edit: sorry I made mistake. Luffy calls yamato with yama-o
 
Last edited:
Are you serious. Laws a direct parallel to doffy.
Law is not a direct parallel to Doffy, Doffy is what Law would've become had he followed Doffy. He's in a sense an inverse.

Doffy mentions it himself how Law is similar to him. Doffy also shares the family theme with Law
Except no, no lmao. Not once has family been a thing for Law. You're making shit up. Law is similar to Doffy because they're both hardened individuals. Family has never been a point of emphasis for Law.

Also part of Corazon's saving was to stop Law from becoming as ruthless as he was in Dressrosa. Him being similar to Doffy is not a good thing, it is why after Dressrosa Law has been portrayed as a lot kinder

Law doesnt fight Doffy for fate, he does it because Doffy killed someone he saw as his older brother.
Law believed Corazon saved him because of his name, we literally have a chapter where he and Sengoku discuss that. Corazon himself wonders if he's doing it because of "D". He even tells Doflamingo that he's a D and what does Doflamingo say? "You think it is your destiny to bring me down?"

Law didn’t become a pirate because of fate, he did it because he saw his family killed by the white plague.
Law became a pirate to kill doflamingo, not to get a new family.

edit: If you mean as a kid, Law specifically said " I don't believe in anything" it is again playing up to the idea of a higher power/fate being cruel to Law

Luffy has stronger themes of fate than law does
Luffy's theme is freedom. That's different from Law's
 
Its funny how you use the case of misdirection to discredit Yamato to favour Carrot, when its actually the reverse.

You talk about Yamato appearing out of nowhere asking to join is the Red Herring, but you don't talk about the Red Herring that has existed for the longest time, and that's Carrot.

Carrot has been the 'potential straw hat' for the longest time, yet she has had little to no developments necessary for a Straw Hat in the timespan and arcs she's been with them. No in-depth flashback and backstory, no real conversation or bonding with Luffy (biting Luffy's ears and crying in his arms don't count), and most importantly of all, Carrot has never had a arc where she was the main character, despite how many arcs she's been in.

Every Straw hat who joined had a arc dedicated to them where they were the main character and where their struggles were resolved by Luffy, Luffy defeated the arcs main villain who they couldn't defeat themselves. Carrot has none of this going for her, but Yamato has-Yamato's biggest obstacle of leaving Wano and adventuring the world is Kaido, the same Kaido that is the main villain that Luffy wants to take down the most.

Breaking a potential Straw Hat candidate from the villain's captive hold and giving them freedom (Nami, Robin, Brook, Zoro etc) or the burden of responsibility that chains and binds them (Jinbe, Sanji, Franky, Chopper, Ussop) is how the bond between a potential Straw Hat and Luffy is created and sealed in stone. It all resolves around the theme of Luffy giving them freedom, either freedom from their captors, or freedom to pursue their dreams and ambitions. In return, the straw hats join Luffy's crew as gratitude for Luffy's help for either breaking them out from their captivity, or their inability to pursue their dreams.

All Straw Hats who joined felled in either one of the two categories. Yamato fits into the Breaking a potential Straw Hat candidate from the villain's captive hold and giving them freedom Category along with Nami, Robin, Brook and Zoro. Carrot fits in neither.

Carrot neither has a villian that is holding her captive, nor a burden that is holding her back from pursuing her dreams (she freely snuck onto the Sunny so easily). So you can see that Carrot just doesn't have the necessary circumstance or backstory to make her bonding with Luffy a compelling one, biting his ears and crying for Pedro don't count.

Yamato's sudden introduction doesn't make her a Red Herring, it actually makes Carrot the Red Herring. If Yamato was the Red Herring, who is she the Red Herring for?? Carrot is actually the Red Herring for Yamato.

Its like the callback to Vivi and Robin, Vivi joined the Straw Hats adventures so easily, yet she still couldn't join the crew for real at the end of Alabasta, Robin meanwhile did. And just Like Yamato, both Robin and Nami were subordinates to Luffy's previous enemies Arlong and Crocodile, just like Yamato is the child of Kaido. Carrot doesn't fit this pattern.

Adding Carrot to the story while also her snucking on the ship, is Oda's intentional doing to serve 2 purposes, and none of them have to do with Carrot joining the crew:

1. Carrot is used as the Red Herring, or bait and misdirection so to speak for the totally unexpected introduction of the real Straw Hat Yamato in the Wano Arc.

2. Carrot is introduced and made to go along with Luffy and half the Straw Hats to WCI as the eye witness to live to tell the tales of the Straw Hats long into the future, in this sense Carrot mirrors the roles that both Inuarashi and Nekomamushi played in sailing with the Pirate King Gol D Roger as Oden's retainers. Neither two went to Laugh Tale, and i don't think Carrot will either.

It's also ironic how you have to resort to manga panels that are misleading to what you are talking about, that's your intentional misdirection. Brook's real focus panel isn't when he first met Luffy, Nami and Sanji. Its when Brook asks Luffy if he can join the crew when Luffy's was lying on the piano that Brook played Bink's Sake at the party after defeating Moria in Chapter 489. It was set up as a 1 one 1 conversation, a conversation that Yamato and Luffy also had together and alone in the attic of Kaido's castle in chapter 984.





Now speaking of which, where is Carrot's one on one talk with Luffy about her wanting to join the crew? All right, she doesn't have one.
Just a little reminder, a red herring must have a narrative prupose.
Carrot being a Red herring because of Yamato have 0 sense.

What narrative purpose would have Carrot being a Red herring? Literally there's none narrative purpose on this.

Carrot and Yamato are not linked, simply they're different candidates, Carrot isn't a red herring of Yamato and Yamato isn't a red herring of Carrot, because there's no necessity of this...
Yamato is a character that could perfectly be a red herring, because the main purpose of the character could be to simply have the key to defeat Kaido. Carrot doesn't have this red herring purpose or possiblity, you think it's a red herring because of being a NAKAMA candidate like Yamato and that's XD

Carrot and Yamato have independent candidatures, Carrot can learn from Neko the relevance of the Minks past, or the relevance of Luffy which is linked to Pedro's death.
Or Carrot can see how bad the Minks could be after the war and stay with them in Zou to help her tribe...

Yamato could join the strawhats because of several reasons ofc, But Yamato has clear red herring purpose,
And there are several possible outcomes for Yamato.
The story of Yamato could be linked to the Heart pirates if she's able to read the phonegliffs or knows how to reach Laugh Tale...
Yamato could stay in Wano until Luffy reaches Laugh tale while Momo sails with Luffy to the end of the grand line to learn the story of the samurais...
Yamato could definitely join the strawhats ofc the character could do that...
But she can choose and have other paths depending on the development of the character... that's one of the reasons because of Yamato could be a red herring, it can have different outcomes, but still has his main role on the arc (To help on the defeat of Kaido).

All I wanted to say is that nothing makes Carrot a red herring or a kind of it. But with Yamato does it...That doesn't mean a shit about her being nakama or not, it just opens her outcomes depending on the development of the character.
XD
Post automatically merged:

Yep rereading wano chapters. When law talked to robin about the will of D, it seemed like it was a new found goal for him. He even had a flashback of Cora san. And to be able to know that, he has to stick around the shs.

And in one sequence, kidd thought Law was already an Sh henchman, ofc law would try to disagree due to his character but he would obey luffy and zoro anyways
Post automatically merged:


In contrary, i imagined comments from chopper or usopp saying having sone of a yonko in their crew would be reassuring, same comments they had when jinbe joined having a former schici would be reassuring.

Other than that, if its luffy's decision the crew was always welcoming. When robin joined everyone disagreed, but they took her anyways, so why would they disagree if yamato would become vital in their victory in this war?
Because Robin was the Oden parallel on the crew.
They joined pretty similar, both crews were opposed and they both can read and write the ancient language...

Carrot is the Minks parallel to Inu and Neko and this time she has to surpass their masters reaching laugh tale and learning the story of the Minks and Kozukis...

And Yamato is? Cool.

And.
Jinbe was linked to Ace=Nakama
Cavendish was linked to Ace=Grand Fleet Nakama

Do you guys really want that every Ace-Linked character in the new world story ends up joining Luffy in some manners?
That isn't cool imo xDxD
 
Last edited:
id love Hancock to join, and the next arc to be about her, depending on what happened to Amazon Lilly. Jinbe, her and Law were all there to save Luffy during and after Marineford, so they are significant characters to him. it could also be a way for Oda to break the MFMM pattern and have a even number of both female and male nakama next to Luffy (4 and 8), as @JoSeungHun7335 suggested. just dont know how to draw parallels with Sanji and Brook as shed likely be the last recruit, assuming Yamato (parallels with Nami and Robin) and Law (parallels with Usopp and Franky) are for now...
I think the parallel with Sanji and Brook is classy pervert. I think Hancock fits this since she's obviously super classy and she pervs for Luffy. She's definitely the one I'm least confident in, but I think she has to re enter the story soon. With the schibuki disbanded she needs Luffy's help to protect Amazon lily, even if it's just by flying his flag.
 

Uncle Van

Humans Evolve. Taxes Never Do.
Might as well elaborate.

Focus: All and I mean ALL of the SHs were one of the main focuses of an arc. They achieved this within less than 40 chapters or so. Carrot, after over 200 chapters and 3 arcs has yet to get any notable focus.

Outcast: ALL of the SHs were outcasts in some way and had sad pasts. Carrot, as far as we know so far, has been very happy. There isn't the slightest hint of any mink feeling out of place.

Interaction with Luffy: ALL of the SHs has had a good interaction with Luffy. Over 200 chapters and all Carrot has done is bit Luffy in a comedicmoment.

Motivation to travel: ALL of the SHs had very personal reasons to go with Luffy. Carrot only left cause she was simply curious about the world.

For those who believe in patterns:
Zoro-Chopper-Jinbe
Nami-Robin
Usopp-Franky
Sanji-Brooke

For a quick example, both Usopp and Franky:
-Lead a gang named after them
-were known as troublemakers in their home town
-joined after the SHs got a new ship tied to someone they know
-got into a serious fight with Luffy
-Main villains were animal themed and worked undercover
-Usopp foreshadowed Franky as he was the first one to mention a shipwright

Carrot and Yamato need to follow a pattern with Nami and Robin. The pattern?

-Both tried to leave the crew for their own good
-Both started off as potential bad guys and Luffy didn't like them much at first
-Both had animal-like main villains
-Both had mothers killed by the villains
-Both had marines adding fuel to their pain(Captain Nezumi being bribed by Arlong, Buster Call for Robin)
-Both couldn't do anything to the villains as they were too weak
-Nami wore Robin's Miss Sunday outfit before the latter's debut(foreshadowing)

It's not hard to find similarities with Yamato but none with Carrot

Carrot4Nakama tends to be very dismissive of patterns cause every one declares Carrot has no chances. Like, every single one.
Continuing for those who believe in patterns.

Zoro-Chopper-Jinbe
-all 3 three were known as monsters before their debut
-all 3 were introduced pacified, opposite of their build up(Zoro tier to a pole, Chopper tied to a sleigh, Jinbe tied down in chains)
-the villains of their arcs were weaklings obsessed with position or status(Morgan and his rank, Wapol and his position of king, Hody and view of being the punisher of humans).
-all 3 had something precious to them saved by Luffy(Zoro's swords, Hiliuk's flag, Fishman Island)

Zoro was being treated by a doc in Orange Town who told the SHs that they really need a doc with them for someone like Zoeo, which foreshadowed Chopper.

In Arlong Park, the color scheme and pattern of Zoro's shirt was the same as Jinbe's spiral sideburns, foreshadowing him.

Sanji-Brooke
-both were introduced aboard a floating vessel
-both introduced showing tea
-both obvious pervy gentleman
-both initially justified them not joining due to something personal
-villains of both arcs relied on external factors for success(Krieg relied on valuable weapons, armors and numbers while Moriah relied on his zombies).
-Both villains had their journeys set back because of an enemy(Mihawk for Krieg, Kaido for Moriah).
-Both villians tried to steal something from the main characters for their own military strength(Baratie Krieg, shadows for Moriah)

At the Baratie, Sanji imagined himself as a skeleton with hair, foreshadowing Brooke
 
Continuing for those who believe in patterns.

Zoro-Chopper-Jinbe
-all 3 three were known as monsters before their debut
-all 3 were introduced pacified, opposite of their build up(Zoro tier to a pole, Chopper tied to a sleigh, Jinbe tied down in chains)
-the villains of their arcs were weaklings obsessed with position or status(Morgan and his rank, Wapol and his position of king, Hody and view of being the punisher of humans).
-all 3 had something precious to them saved by Luffy(Zoro's swords, Hiliuk's flag, Fishman Island)

Zoro was being treated by a doc in Orange Town who told the SHs that they really need a doc with them for someone like Zoeo, which foreshadowed Chopper.

In Arlong Park, the color scheme and pattern of Zoro's shirt was the same as Jinbe's spiral sideburns, foreshadowing him.

Sanji-Brooke
-both were introduced aboard a floating vessel
-both introduced showing tea
-both obvious pervy gentleman
-both initially justified them not joining due to something personal
-villains of both arcs relied on external factors for success(Krieg relied on valuable weapons, armors and numbers while Moriah relied on his zombies).
-Both villains had their journeys set back because of an enemy(Mihawk for Krieg, Kaido for Moriah).
-Both villians tried to steal something from the main characters for their own military strength(Baratie Krieg, shadows for Moriah)

At the Baratie, Sanji imagined himself as a skeleton with hair, foreshadowing Brooke
I can't think of anyone who fits all of these currently, but I think the closest would actually be Vivi.
 
Continuing for those who believe in patterns.

Zoro-Chopper-Jinbe
-all 3 three were known as monsters before their debut
-all 3 were introduced pacified, opposite of their build up(Zoro tier to a pole, Chopper tied to a sleigh, Jinbe tied down in chains)
-the villains of their arcs were weaklings obsessed with position or status(Morgan and his rank, Wapol and his position of king, Hody and view of being the punisher of humans).
-all 3 had something precious to them saved by Luffy(Zoro's swords, Hiliuk's flag, Fishman Island)

Zoro was being treated by a doc in Orange Town who told the SHs that they really need a doc with them for someone like Zoeo, which foreshadowed Chopper.

In Arlong Park, the color scheme and pattern of Zoro's shirt was the same as Jinbe's spiral sideburns, foreshadowing him.

Sanji-Brooke
-both were introduced aboard a floating vessel
-both introduced showing tea
-both obvious pervy gentleman
-both initially justified them not joining due to something personal
-villains of both arcs relied on external factors for success(Krieg relied on valuable weapons, armors and numbers while Moriah relied on his zombies).
-Both villains had their journeys set back because of an enemy(Mihawk for Krieg, Kaido for Moriah).
-Both villians tried to steal something from the main characters for their own military strength(Baratie Krieg, shadows for Moriah)

At the Baratie, Sanji imagined himself as a skeleton with hair, foreshadowing Brooke
I've always liked this theory, I think we should be looking at Usopp/Franky and Sanji/Brook for any hints at the next SH
 
I've always liked this theory, I think we should be looking at Usopp/Franky and Sanji/Brook for any hints at the next SH
Nami/Robin- Yamato
Ussop/Franky- Law

Those two are pretty on the nose.

Sanji/Brook- no one comes to mind. Closest would probably be Vivi, maybe Hancock just a little bit. Probably an unintroduced character if it has to fit perfectly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top