I can provide evidence for sure but I don't think that'll change your assumption or anything cause you aren't being much rational here so I won't bother finding them
If the evidence is clear. I don't see why this wouldn't change my mind. I'm very rationnal when I talk about storytelling. Nothing is personnal for me here.
That is not what I'm asking. I'm am asking you a question that must be answered with a statement, not another nonsense question.
The answer to your quesiton is yes. I'm always requestionning my reasonning because I want to be the most accurate possible. For example at first my Nakama theory was too favorable for Carrot. In the way I put my statement, there was no ay for another cahracter to have points. That's why I choosed to have two raw how parameters. First 7 clear rules that must absolutely be respected for a character to join, then 11 parameters that each strawhats have in common with a point system: with that some characters don't have to have to get all the parameterss, they just need to have enough points. This is therefore the fairest way to judge the characters. Then only I analyse specific storytelling evidences and deconstruct them.
But not, at the beginning, my reasonning was stupid. It was just Carrot will becomes Nakama because of "that list" of things.. Without putting that into perspective and other characters, it was meaningless.
U keep telling yourself that she doesn't have any evidence when ODA make her say she will leave with luffy, and also Love the fact that he even put in that she wants to leave with ace but couldn't because of the cuff and also said that she was waiting for MONKEY D LUFFY and now that the cuff is off nothing is stopping her from leaving wano NOT EVEN YOU CARROT FANS.
Where do you say taht I said that the hypothesis of yamato/yamatoForNakamaTheory becoming a Nakama had no evidences behind it. It's an hypothesis/theory (at these stage, it's not clear), there ARE evidences behind it supporting her character:
- The fact that Luffy freed her
- The fact taht she is highly focused on by Oda
- The fact that she has a very strong symbolic reach
- The fact that she has a "simili" moral pillar
- The fact that she has a great desire.
The problem is that those are not enough when we put this in perspective with Carrot.
-Yamato only has three advantages: Luffy freed her and is fighting Kaido her oppressor / She is focus on.
- Carrot has a lot more: Pedro is a REAL moral pillar / Carrot has a post on the Sunny / Carrot has a real dynamic with the crew / Carrot character arc is directed toward a greater purpose
And that when we enter into the details (11 Pillars) the gap gets bigger.
There is really nothing personnal from my part. I would love for Yamato to be on the same level as Carrot. Two more strawhats would be a real treat, but Yamato's case is just not strong enough right now.