You are talking in circles.
It is literally stated by the author that Mihawk is the world strongest swordsman so how is it baseless that he is superior to Shanks
did the author mention an account of Shank's defeat..
or are we assuming Shanks lost a battle
or is it that him loosing an arm and not fighting again with Mihawk the bar we are using.
why would Mihawk want to fight someone surpasses Shanks if he has already defeated Shanks.. why don't the viver card say that he want to fight someone stronger than him?
pretty vague innt?
so arguing that he's superior in all aspects isn't even a question.. and cannot be justified from i story narrative
Yeah you can keep that headcanon. Mihawk's infamy is from Oda.
It is obvious and straightforward as stated in the manga
when did i say its not...
You are the one who made the claim without any proof then you ask another person to prove you wrong lol.
The coping has reached delusional levels now. Swordsmanship includes hakj
No you are just crying that your headcanon was contradicted by the manga. There's no assumption that Mihawk is the strongest swordsman...it is fact
i meant haki hax like zoom call haki and CoO sabotage haki
that doesn't include skill in swordsmanship ship
and yes it remains an opinion based on outdated references on Marine's end..