Controversial The defenitive thread about swordsmanship skills and titles.

[[No Name]]

Fenaker on page 24 already debunked you both.

T.D.A explained It was refering about Mihawk and the context makes It clear It was Mihawk.

If there are doubts we can ask to @PuckTheGreat (Sorry to mention you again :c).

 

[nik87]

That guy you tagged Is not me.

I gave credits to the wrong man...

 

[gz89]

T.D.A explained It was refering about Mihawk and the context makes It clear It was Mihawk.

If there are doubts we can ask to @PuckTheGreat (Sorry to mention you again :c).

If you consider everything in the databooks correct why dont you consider this canon aswell ? Or even Mihawk's VC stating he is waiting someone stronger than Shanks.

 

[[No Name]]

If you consider everything in the databooks correct why dont you consider this canon aswell ? Or even Mihawk's VC stating he is waiting someone stronger than Shanks.

I mean yes, they were equal.
In fact SHANKS's vivrecard says "from fighting Mihawk to become en equal to Whitebeard"
Shanks evolved.

 

[gz89]

I mean yes, they were equal.
In fact SHANKS's vivrecard says "from fighting Mihawk to become en equal to Whitebeard"
Shanks evolved.

Nope it states he evolved into an equal presence to Whitebeard. This can have countless meanings not necessarily strength wise but status like Yonko. On the contrary in Mihawk's vivre card specifically stated that he is waiting someone stronger than Shanks.

 

[HA001]

@NoName since you and the other genius couldn't answer my last big post

Explain Why zoros new power up a sword style he can only do with haki not just sword skill

Zoro has a new sword style dependant on HAKI


Now what

 

[[No Name]]

Nope it states he evolved into an equal presence to Whitebeard. This can have countless meanings not necessarily strength wise but status like Yonko. On the contrary in Mihawk's vivre card specifically stated that he is waiting someone stronger than Shanks.

Post It, full translated and do not use a "summary'

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

@NoName since you and the other genius couldn't answer my last big post

Explain Why zoros new power up a sword style he can only do with haki not just sword skill

Zoro has a new sword style dependant on HAKI


Now what

Stop tagging that dude it's not me look at his avatar.

 

[gz89]

Post It, full translated and do not use a "summary'

Here

 

[[No Name]]

@NoName since you and the other genius couldn't answer my last big post

Explain Why zoros new power up a sword style he can only do with haki not just sword skill

Zoro has a new sword style dependant on HAKI


Now what

So what?
You can use haki to make your swordsmanship Better never Say It not.
Depends on you USE haki.
Did Roger use haki for make his sword black? No.
Did Mihawk? Yes.
So Mihawk applied haki to swordsmanship, while Roger the other way around appling swordsmanship as the auxiliary thing/as a tool to his haki

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

Here

I talk about Mihawk's One.

 

[Rootbeer]

Fake the diligent Daikengou there is refering to mihawk..

 

[HA001]

So what?
You can use haki to make your swordsmanship Better never Say It not.
Depends on you USE haki.
Did Roger use haki for make his sword black? No.
Did Mihawk? Yes.
So Mihawk applied haki to swordsmanship, while Roger the other way around appling swordsmanship as the auxiliary thing/as a tool to his haki

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

I talk about Mihawk's One.

Roger can't make his sword black permanently cause his haki isn't good enough

Roger did coat his sword in haki and made it black

 

[Rootbeer]

Fenaker on page 24 already debunked you both.

Wrong translation..

 

[Sword God Ryuma]

So what?
You can use haki to make your swordsmanship Better never Say It not.
Depends on you USE haki.
Did Roger use haki for make his sword black? No.
Did Mihawk? Yes.
So Mihawk applied haki to swordsmanship, while Roger the other way around appling swordsmanship as the auxiliary thing/as a tool to his haki

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

I talk about Mihawk's One.

Why you talking about black blade when we don't know requirements

 

[gz89]

So what?
You can use haki to make your swordsmanship Better never Say It not.
Depends on you USE haki.
Did Roger use haki for make his sword black? No.
Did Mihawk? Yes.
So Mihawk applied haki to swordsmanship, while Roger the other way around appling swordsmanship as the auxiliary thing/as a tool to his haki

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

I talk about Mihawk's One.

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

Wrong translation..

Prove it.

 

[Rootbeer]

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

Prove it.

Rivals 13 years ago when mihawk was not even WSS yet..

 

[LolonoisZolo]

It's crazy that both Roger and Shanks need a named sword as an accessory when they could have used a bamboo stick instead (god bless Vergo)

 

[style]

he's the one which Is responsable/takes care of being the chief of staff and he asses/evalutes the youngest ones

Vista is Chief of Staff

 

[gz89]

Rivals 13 years ago when mihawk was not even WSS yet..

This is your headcanon theory.

The VC doesnt say anything about Mihawk not evolving in these years. You insist about some "Kengou/Dai Kengou" databook theories when there was no time in the manga that someone had an official ranking among the swordsmen, but when another databook or VC says something you dont like you come up with excuses.

 

[CbShadow]

So what?
You can use haki to make your swordsmanship Better never Say It not.
Depends on you USE haki.
Did Roger use haki for make his sword black? No.
Did Mihawk? Yes.
So Mihawk applied haki to swordsmanship, while Roger the other way around appling swordsmanship as the auxiliary thing/as a tool to his haki

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2022

I talk about Mihawk's One.

Stop lying to yourself. Zoro and Roger both apply haki to their swordsmanship.

 

[style]

Stop tagging that dude it's not me look at his avatar.

Change your username Nameless monster it's impossible to tag you